HAMDI V. RUMSFELD Name of case: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld Date decided: June 24‚ 2004 Summary (facts) of case: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld was case brought to the United States which began in April 28‚ 2004. Hamdi was born in 1980. Originally residing in Louisiana where he was born‚ making him a United States citizen‚ he later moved with his family to Saudi Arabia. At the age of twenty Hamdi traveled for his first time
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld Yaser Esam Hamdi‚ an American citizen‚ was captured in Afghanistan shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11th. Hamdi was classified as an “enemy combatant” by the United States. His father filed a petition of Habeas Corpus that his fifth and fourteenth amendments were in violation. Although the petition did not specify on the actual circumstances of Hamdi’s capture and detention‚ the record indicated that Hamdi went to Afghanistan to do “relief work” less than two
Premium United States Constitution Hamdi v. Rumsfeld President of the United States
One defining case in this history of torture laws is that of Hamdi V. Rumsfeld (2002) and Hamdan V. Rumsfeld (2006). Both of these cases involved former detained individuals at Guantanamo Bay‚ one of the aforementioned secret prisons. In Hamdi V. Rumsfeld‚ the legality of indefinite detention and suspension of Habeas Corpus for “enemy combatants” was questioned. The only decision that SCOTUS was able to rest on was the Executive Branch does not have the power to hold a U.S. citizen indefinitely without
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Human rights Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld Thompson‚ 1 Hamdi v. Rumsfeld: Detained Enemy Combatants Michael Thompson Liberty High School AP Government 4A Hamdi v. Rumsfeld was a very controversial case in the early 21st century. With terrorism being a striking topic at the time‚ the rights of alleged enemy combatants was argued in the Supreme Court in 2004. This case determined the rights of enemy combatants and assured the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment of Due Process is available to all U
Premium United States George W. Bush President of the United States
Kevin C March 26‚ 2013 US History I Honors Boumediene v. Bush The United States is a free country that was forged out of the tyrannical English Monarchy. Thomas Jefferson wrote that “All men are created equal‚ that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights” (Declaration of Independence). Those rights are represented in the United States Constitution which is the foundation which strongly upholds American ideals and beliefs. Although the Constitution does not always
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus Boumediene v. Bush
After the tragedy of September 11‚ 2001‚ President George W. Bush used his powers as Commander in Chief and established a means to prevent future terrorist attacks against the United States. On November 13‚ 2001‚ Bush issued a military order (M.O.) which allowed the President’s to “identify terrorists and those who support them” and bring them to justice by way of “military tribunals.” President Bush argues that it is his duty to “protect the United States and its citizens.” The M.O. makes
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus President of the United States
1017/S1744552311000085 BOUMEDIENE v. BUSH. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 30 January 2013. http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007 06 1195 Staab‚ J. B. (2008). The war on terror ’s impact on habeas corpus: The constitutionality of the military commission’s act of 2006. Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies‚ (8)‚ 280-297. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213962970?accountid=32521 Pond‚ B. C. (2009). Boumediene v. bush: Habeas corpus‚ exhaustion
Premium Habeas corpus Common law Boumediene v. Bush
POL201: American National Government theory on Habeas Corpus Habeas Corpus is from Latin language that means "you have the body". (Lectlaw 1995) It is the name of a legal action or writ by means of which detainees or prisoners can seek relief from. (Levin-Waldman‚ 2012). This simply means that a person that is accused of a crime has the right to know what the charges are made against them. Habeas Corpus is clearly represented in the United States Constitution in the
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus Boumediene v. Bush
as the "great writ of liberty" in both the English and American constitutional traditions.) c. Boumediene v. Bush summary. Oyez. (2008). Boumediene v. Bush. IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved from http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_06_1195 (This brief article summarizes the facts and legal questions related to habeas corpus in the Supreme Court case of Boumediene v. Bush.) 4. Watch the following videos: a. Writ of Habeas Corpus. Films on Demand. (2006). Writ of habeas
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus Boumediene v. Bush
References: Sloss‚ David L. (Oct 2004)‚ The American Journal of International Law‚ Rasul v. Bush D.‚ (Oct 1861)‚ Writ of Habeas Corpus‚ The American Law Register (1852-1891) Vol. 9: No 1 Hardin‚ Russell‚ (2004)‚ Civil Liberties in the Era of Mass Terrorism‚ The Journal of Ethics Vol. 8 No1‚ Terrorism Levin-Waldman‚ O. (2012)‚ American Government
Premium Habeas corpus United States Supreme Court of the United States