of judicial review is both wider and more specific than was the case with “no evidence” grounds for judicial review at common law.‟ Justice Kirby‚ Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2002] 210 CLR 222‚ at [111]. Of the judgments in Rajamanikkam‚ which do you prefer‚ and what justification can you provide for your preference? In answering the question‚ you should read the following three prescribed cases. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam
Premium Law Common law
IELTS Essay‚ topic: children and rules In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior‚ in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like. To what extent should children have to follow rules? The extent to which children have to follow rules is in itself a very complex issue‚ since children across the world grow up in very different cultures. In India for example‚ children are expected to be very submissive to their parents as well as other adults around them. This
Free Behavior Human behavior Psychology
God.[10] The Islamic Golden Age‚ which is traditionally dated as being the 8th–13th centuries‚ was marked by the ascension of the Abbasid Caliphate. The Abbasids were influenced by the Quran’s injunction that “the ink of the scholar is more holy than the blood of the martyr.” During this time‚ the Arab world became an intellectual center for science‚ astronomy‚ chemistry‚ physics‚ mathematics‚ philosophy‚ medicine‚ and education.[2] Islam is the fastest-growing religion in the world today There
Premium Islam Muhammad Qur'an
1.) What is the traditional "rule on solicitation"? When was this rule first enunciated? What right does the rule grant to workers? The traditional “rule of solicitation” is that it was a violation of the NLRA for an employer to maintain overly broad rules restricting employee solicitations of fellow employees or the distribution of written materials. The rule on solicitation was issued‚ by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1945. The rule grants workers the right to speak with other workers about
Premium Law Rulemaking
<<<< CCS(LTC) RULES >>>> CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES (LEAVE TRAVEL CONCESSION) RULES‚ 1988 1. Short title‚ commencement and application. – (1) These rules may be called the Central Civil Services (Leave Travel Concession) Rules‚ 1988. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. (3) Subject to the provisions of sub-rule (4)‚ these rules shall apply to all persons – (i) who are appointed to civil services and posts including
Premium Government of India Government India
In a landmark supreme court case‚ called the united states versus weeks‚ the supreme courts created a rule to our criminal procedure called the exclusionary rule. What the exclusionary rule means is that if the police obtain evidence against you in violation of your constitutional rights‚ they cannot use that evidence against you to prove your guilt or innocence at a trial. An example of this would be police searching your home without a search warrant. If they found illegal item in your home during
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
In the short story “Silver Pavements‚ Golden Roofs”‚ the author Chitra Divakaruni highlights and enhances the theme of how Jayanti’s high class and wealthy background sets her up for high expectations of living the American Dream but later on disappoint her. Jayanti’s mindset initially presents an optimistic future and more idealistic view of America‚ but upon her arrival this idealistic view slowly begins to deteriorate by her uncle’s view of America. This idea raises the question of how does Jayanti’s
Premium James Truslow Adams American Dream Idealism
The M’Naghten Rule: 1843 Aspects of the Criminal law in Canada are likely to be traced back several hundred years ago‚ where the legal system was established in England. Criminal law‚ derived from public law‚ includes the subject of criminal defenses‚ and in a narrower sense‚ the theory of not being criminally responsible on account of a mental disorder. The theory behind this defense can be traced back to England in the 1840’s. This era showcased the influential case of Daniel M’Nagthen
Premium Schizophrenia Mental disorder Insanity defense
In Adam Foulds’ short story‚ The Rules Are the Rules‚ Peter’s closet homosexuality is the most obvious instance of a character being in the closet. His character steamrolls his way through the story‚ showing the challenges of being a closeted Catholic priest. Throughout the story‚ we see Peter struggling internally with his secret and his relationship with God. However‚ what if Peter’s case was not the only expression of closeted homosexuality in the story? If a closer look is taken‚ one could find
Premium Catholic Church Sexual orientation Coming out