2.2.5 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Liebniz adds some clarification to Descartes argument in an attempt to strengthen it‚ he argue that’s Descartes has not asserted how coherent the idea of a “perfect being” is‚ Leibniz argues that unless this point is demonstrated then overall argument fails. In order to prevent this Leibniz attempts to analyze what perfection actually means‚ he concludes that this is an impossible task and concludes that it’s impossible to demonstrate all perfections are incompatible
Premium Existence Metaphysics God
I applaud Descartes in actually establishing something (that is not nothing) in his second Meditation and think he is getting somewhere‚ however‚ I also feel that there remains a large hole in his logic and that he is perhaps not being quite as methodical and careful in the conclusions he draws from the cogito. The starting point is‚ of course‚ the projection of thought – the actual act of thinking and the way in which it defines and characterizes the human mind. To be as meticulous and scrupulous
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Mind
feel or have senses should at the very least be carefully examined and rigorously tested to determine whether it is‚ in fact‚ a reality” (From the abstract). Basically‚ we have to revise rigorously before we make the decisions. Now‚ according to Descartes about the dream hypothesis‚ when a person dreams‚ they can see many things that are very specifically clear but those things actually are not present at the moment or do not exist at all. Similarly‚ we see many
Premium Dream Psychology Unconscious mind
Erik Irre Modern Philosophy December 16‚ 1999 Paper 1‚ Section 2 If these great thinkers (Descartes‚ Spinoza‚ and Leibniz) were to discuss instead the soul’s connection to the body‚ what might each say (both on his own behalf and in response to the other)? Would they find any places where they might agree? If not‚ why not? (These are‚ after all‚ smart guys!) Though this sort of meeting would strike me as a debate with as furiously disparate and uncompromising ideals as one would find
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Philosophy
In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy‚ I will be considering the “dreaming argument” if Descartes’s resolution seems acceptable to believe. In the First Meditation is where the “dreaming argument” is first mentioned and then later he has resolved the argument in the Sixth Meditation and the Objections and Replies. I will be touching on the idea that our experiences could be dreaming experiences based on personal experiences and thoughts I have had on the topic. Then I will go on to explain
Premium Reality Mind Perception
Like Descartes‚ Montesquieu associated freedom as being in accordance with reason. Unlike Descartes‚ Montesquieu did discuss external freedom as embodied through law more at length‚ and also wrote extensively on the subject of slavery. In The Spirit of Laws‚ Montesquieu writes that “… political liberty does not consist in an unlimited freedom. In governments‚ that is‚ in societies directed by laws‚ liberty can consist only in the power of doing what we ought to will‚ and in not being constrained
Premium Slavery Slavery in the United States Human rights
Paper1 Rene Descartes: Account of Mind and Body In examining Rene Descartes’ philosophy on the mind-body distinction‚ it is clear that his theory has several problems. In order to illustrate these problems it is necessary to reconstruct his theory. After this‚ one can then show the particular disadvantages that these problems create. Finally‚ one can imagine the possible responses Descartes might have developed to overcome these problems. In order to synopsize Rene Descartes’ view it is important
Premium Mind René Descartes Metaphysics
My Objection to James Rachels’s Argument The dramatic advances in medical technology has saved and prolonged the lives of many people who would have hopelessly perished in the past centuries. Nowadays physicians are aware and able to cure more diseases than ever before. Despite our remarkable medical knowledge‚ however‚ death is still fearful and inevitable. There is no such thing as a good time to die‚ but there is perhaps a better way to die. One with incurable or terribly painful illnesses
Premium Euthanasia
Hobbes’ Leviathan is divided into four parts: Of Man‚ Of Commonwealth‚ Of a Christian Commonwealth‚ and Of the Kingdom of Darkness. Overall Hobbes tried to explain the reasons a commonwealth may govern men‚ and how to create the best way for this type government to function in order to contain the desires of its denizens. Leviathan represents a key turning point in Hobbes’s perspectives on religion‚ since for the first time he becomes fully aware of what may be called the political problem of religion
Premium Thomas Hobbes Political philosophy State of nature
perfect theology and reason‚ making it a compelling contender for the most persuasive argument for the existence of God. It’s crucial to continue discussing and examining these arguments in order to fully grasp their complexities and importance. Descartes’ argument merges cosmology and ontology in order to demonstrate the existence of a supremely perfect being. He argues that the concept of a perfect being is innate to us and cannot originate from anything else. This argument highlights the idea of
Premium