Routledge‚ London. Hellriegel‚ Slocum & Woodman. (2001). Organisational Behavior. (9th ed). South-Western. pp. 523. Hofstede‚ G. (1984). Cultural Consequences: International Differences in Work Values. Sage‚ Beverly Hills. Hofstede‚ G. (1992). Culture and Organisations: Software of the Mind. McGraw Hill‚ Maidenhead. Hofstede‚ G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences. Sage‚ Beverly Hills‚ CA. Hofstede‚ G. (1997). Culture and Organisations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its importance for
Premium Organizational culture Organizational studies Culture
avoidance. Hofstede (1980) considers the Chinese culture to be characterized by high power distance‚ medium masculinity and weak uncertainty avoidance. For this reason‚ this study explores the impact of Chinese core cultural values on the communication behaviour of Chinese students learning English. A questionnaire was used as a technique to collect data about the topic from fifty overseas Chinese students at Newcastle upon Tyne and Northumbria Universities. This study agreed with Hofstede in the
Premium Culture Han Chinese Geert Hofstede
– one from their father and one from their mother. We should use the father’s surname when addressing someone. Venezuela has more flexible attitude towards time. People could be late‚ as well as business meetings or social events can begin late (Hofstede‚ G.‚ 2013). Business companies in Venezuela are hierarchical. Decisions‚ ideas and recommendations are generated from the top. Status is very important here‚ so people should show respect to their supervisors and colleagues as well. In this society
Premium Venezuela Interpersonal relationship Cross-cultural communication
Organization Science‚ 7(4)‚ 375 – 389. Gupta‚ A. K. & Govindarajan‚ V. (2001). Converting Global Presence into Competitive Advantage Hofstede‚ G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values Hofstede‚ G. (1984). Cultural Dimensions in Management and Planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management‚ 6(1)‚ 81 – 99. Hofstede‚ G. (1993). Cultural Constraints in Management Theories. Academy of Management Executive‚ 7(1)‚ 81 – 93. Huselid‚ M. A. (1995). The Impact
Premium Human resource management Geert Hofstede Management
UNDERSTANDING ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Deepak K. Agrawal‚ College of Business‚ Wayne State College 1111 Main‚ Wayne‚ NE 68787‚ deagra01@wsc.edu ABSTRACT Culture has significant impact on the organization. People of an organization learn the national culture as they grow up. It is very deeply rooted in their lives because of the fact that they learned and followed such culture for a very long period of time. It is also based on shared attitudes‚ beliefs‚ customs‚ written and unwritten rules that
Premium Organizational culture
the case should include‚ but need not be limited to the following: 1. Using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions as a point of reference‚ what are some of the main cultural differences between the United States and France? 2. In what way has Trompenaars’ research on organisational culture helped explain cultural differences between the United States and France? 3. In managing its Euro Disneyland operations‚ explain three mistakes that the company made? 4. Based on its experience‚ discuss
Premium Cross-cultural communication Culture Scientific method
1. After reading Hofstede ’s dimensions of cultural differences in Chapter 2 (pages 40-44) and looking up and reviewing near the bottom of Geert Hofstede ’s web page (http://www.geert-hofstede.com/)‚ describe a significant difference between cultures that you have witnessed. Use the Geert Hofstede comparison tool (at the link below) to compare the two cultures in your example and describe the relative merits of the different approaches in an organizational situation. During my time in the Marine
Premium Culture United States Cross-cultural communication
References: ［1］Bernardin‚ H. & Buckley‚ M. Strategies in Rater Training [J]. Academy of Management Review‚ 1981‚6:205-212. ［4］Hofstede‚ G Riding the Waves of Commerce: A Test of Trompenaars’ "Model” of National Culture Differences[J].Int. J‚ Intercultural Rel.‚ 1996‚20(2):189-193. ［5］Kloeg‚ M. (2007) Nokia: The Global Success and the Role of HRM. BA Thesis. Tilburg: Tilburg University. ［7］Merriden‚ T. (2001)
Premium Human resource management Multinational corporation Performance appraisal
INTRODUCTION DEFINATION OF VALUES Basic convictions that a specific mode of conduct or end-state of existence if personally or socially preferable to an opposite or converse mode of conduct and end-state of existence. When we rank an individual’s value in terms their intensity‚ we obtain that person’s value system. This system is identified by the relative importance we assign to values such as freedom‚ pleasure‚ self-respect‚ honesty‚ obedience‚ and equality. IMPORTANCE OF VALUES Values are
Free Culture Cross-cultural communication Geert Hofstede
El-Akremi‚ Assaad‚ Jacques I.‚ Valerie S‚ and Gond J.P. 2010 Corporate Social Responsibility Influence on Employees. Research‚ Nottingham: Nottingham University Busniess School. Hofstede‚ Gert Jan‚ and Paul Pedersen. 2012. Exploring culture exercises‚ stories‚ and synthetic cultures. Yarmouth‚ Me.: Intercultural Press. Hofstede‚ G.‚ and M. H. Bond. 1988. "The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth." Organizational Dynamics 16 (4) (Spring): 5-21 Hopkins‚ Michael Lian‚ Goh Chin. 2009
Premium Culture Management Cross-cultural communication