of the criminal justice system by understanding and addressing the reasons why people commit crimes. Results expected with ARI include reduced prison overcrowding‚ lowered cost to taxpayers‚ and an end to the expensive and vicious cycle of crime and incarceration. Start date: March 1‚ 2011; First enrollment: April 1‚ 2011 Grant amount: $250‚000 Supplemental Funding Requested: (January
Premium Criminology Prison Criminal justice
One country‚ two systems "One country‚ two systems" is an idea originally proposed by Deng Xiaoping‚ then Paramount Leader of the People ’s Republic of China (PRC)‚ for the reunification of China during the early 1980s. He suggested that there would be only one China‚ but areas such as Hong Kong‚ Macau and Taiwan could have their own capitalist economic and political systems‚ while the rest of China uses the "socialist" system. However‚ Deng rejected the proposed use of such a system for territories
Premium Hong Kong People's Republic of China Macau
A Virtual Court System… Justice on the Web Learning Team A Web-based case management is a direct result of today’s advanced technology. A large number of the court system’s lawyers‚ judges‚ legal administrators‚ and administrative support personnel are using cutting-edge word processors‚ electronic legal research‚ time and billing programs‚ and increasingly‚ varying forms of case management software. Web-based case management is the idea of the future. According to
Premium Bench Judge Law
Commissary system work The historical significance of commissary system work‚ by money being sent by families‚ often include of visits. In 1930‚ they authorized and established a commissary at each federal institution. It impact today‚ by while incarcerated‚ prisoners are provided meals‚ basic clothing‚ and a few very basic personal care items. Prisoners can act like normal citizens‚ with trust fund money to purchase additional supplies from the prison commissary. Commissary system work shows it
Premium Prison Penology Criminal justice
Juvenile Court Process CJS/220 Introduction to Criminal Court System July 9‚ 2014 In this assignment‚ I am required to explain the court process as it relates to the juvenile offenders in the criminal justice system. I think that first‚ it is very important to realize that there are many different outlets to consider when speaking on the ways in which the juvenile court process works. I think that we need to realize that there are different ways that a juvenile can be processed after
Free Crime Criminal justice Criminal law
claim to fame courts. Social structure hypothesis‚ at the end of the day‚ the variations that outcome from destitution and the way of criminal action because of absence of assets and thereof. General strain hypothesis advises us that the enthusiastic health of people and their current circumstances might possibly be an immediate consequence of criminal exercises. Intellectual hypothesis partners criminal movement with self-discernment and one’s encompassing as a determinant to how a man might support
Premium
Magistrates’ courts All criminal cases start in a magistrates’ court. Cases are heard by either 2 or 3 magistrates and a district judge There isn’t a jury in a magistrates’ court. A magistrates’ court normally handles cases known as ‘summary offences’‚ eg: most motoring offences minor criminal damage being drunk and disorderly It can also deal with some of the more serious offences‚ eg: burglary drugs offences These are called ‘either way’ offences and can be heard either in a magistrates’ court or a Crown
Premium Judge Jury Law
In Tennessee‚ a juvenile can be transferred from juvenile court to adult court after a petition is filed alleging delinquency based on conduct that is a crime under Tennessee law‚ local ordinances‚ or the Court. A hearing is held to determine if the child is sixteen years of age at the time of the alleged crime or if the child is less than sixteen years old. If the child is less than sixteen years old‚ then for the transfer hearing to move forward the child has to be charged with a serious offense
Premium Crime Criminology Juvenile delinquency
the court‚ The Dynamic and the Constrained Court. In the Dynamic Court‚ the court is viewed as the main arbiter of social change‚ were social reform can occur without the delay of other political institutions. For proponents of the Dynamic Court view‚ the landmark Supreme Court cases such as‚ Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade are viewed as some as some of the strongest pieces of evidence that the court is an exceptional tool for activists. But the inherent problem with Dynamic Court viewpoint
Premium Same-sex marriage Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Movement to Supreme Court’s decisions in the Brown v. Board of Education case. Federalism under the Marshall Courts serves significance‚ because it contributed to the evolution and the representation of the branches of the government while shaping the ideology of a traditional government. To begin‚ Federalism in this context is in relations with the Marshall Court‚ “referring to the Supreme Courts of the United States from 1801 to 1835‚ when John Marshall served as the fourth Chief Justice of the United
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Federalism