Preview

Drug Court Cases

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
954 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Drug Court Cases
Knox County-Adult Redeploy Illinois
Goals and background: Adult Redeploy Illinois (ARI) provides financial incentives to local jurisdictions that design evidence-based services to supervise and treat non-violent offenders in the community instead of sending them to state prisons. ARI is based on the premise that local jurisdictions can reduce crime and the costs of the criminal justice system by understanding and addressing the reasons why people commit crimes. Results expected with ARI include reduced prison overcrowding, lowered cost to taxpayers, and an end to the expensive and vicious cycle of crime and incarceration. Start date: March 1, 2011; First enrollment: April 1, 2011 Grant amount: $250,000 Supplemental Funding Requested: (January
…show more content…
Prior to ARI funding, the public defender and the probation officer serving the drug court managed mixed caseloads of both drug court and non-drug court participants. ARI funding allows the probation officer and a contract defense attorney to focus solely on the needs of drug court offender. Evidence-based/promising practices in use: LSI-R assessment, cognitive-behavioral therapy, Thinking for a Change curriculum, drug court Target population and reduction goals: Knox County has operated a drug court since 2008. From 2007 to 2009, Knox County committed to IDOC an annual average of 70 offenders who would have been eligible for diversion to a drug court program or other community-based supervision program. Knox County’s 25% reduction goal for the grant period, based on recent commitment levels within the target population, is 16. In February 2012, in exchange for supplemental funding, the reduction goal was increased to 24. Overview of jurisdiction: Knox County, located in north central Illinois, covers approximately 719 square …show more content…
The ARI-supported expanded drug court allows for a higher participation capacity and consists of drug court-dedicated staff and increased treatment availability. A drug court officer works solely with drug court program offenders, providing supervision/monitoring, drug testing, and implementation of cognitivebehavioral Thinking for a Change groups. A drug court attorney works with offenders, representing them from first appearance to the end of the program. The attorney attends the weekly drug court staffing, recommends sanctions/rewards, and assists offenders with ancillary legal issues, such as custody, tenant, and ordinance violation issues. A half-time program administrator facilitates the programs and manages communication among all drug court team members, a process formerly managed by the probation officer and treatment provider. Bridgeway operates “Bridges to Recovery,” a new drug court-dedicated treatment track. Bridgeway assesses potential participants within seven days of a drug court eligibility determination and recommends a level of treatment from detoxification to outpatient. For inpatient treatment, Bridgeway refers and provides transportation to the nearest treatment center (50 miles away) and maintains communication with the provider. For outpatient treatment, Bridgeway offers

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rights and freedoms of every Canadian individual are upheld and fought for through the effectiveness in the Supreme Court. When cases make its way up to the Supreme Court it’s their duty to decipher the right and just judgment, making sure the individual's rights and freedoms have not been infringed upon. The court's effectiveness is able to balance the of the individual needs against society's, ensuring fair treatment of judgment at the last and highest court.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The research by Dirks-Linhorst, Groom & Linhorst (2012) focused on the effectiveness of substance abuse treatment as an intermediate sanction on probationers in a jail setting who had been previously unsuccessful in completing community based treatment. Dirks-Linhorst et al. (2012) sought how this established method of treatment would differ among two separate groups of state probationers. One group of probationers was sent directly to jail upon their conviction and would participate in the Choices Program. Upon successful program completion, they would be released. The second group of probationers was placed on state probation at the time of their conviction, but when they violated their probation they were then incarcerated to participate…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Per the NADCP National Association of Drug Court Professionals objective is to transform millions of lives of defendants through addressing issues they face with anti-social behavior they display within the community. Per NADCP 492 Drug Courts existed. By June 30, 2012, 2,734 Drug Courts were operating in every U.S. state and territory (Finn, P., and A.K. Newlyn.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nsw Drug Court Case Study

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Drug Court of New South Wales was introduced in February 1999 as a 2-year-pilot program under the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW). After various evaluations it was decided to extend the pilot-program until 2004, with amendments being made to the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) in December 2002.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article, it looks at the effectiveness of drug courts compared to the more conventional court penalties on offenders. Kornhauser (2016) indicates how drug courts reduce offender’s chances reoffending by entering them into treatment programs, over incarceration. Kornhauser (2016) states there’s a lack of consistent evidence to prove this theory. Drug courts started its first rehabilitation program in NSW in 1999. Drug courts can now be found operating in other Australian jurisdictions to combat crime.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Jail Diversion Project” (which helps inmates that are released). This program assists inmates in various ways by providing individual therapy and counseling, employment services, Psychiatric evaluation, monitoring of medication, housing access, how an individual is living and transitional living services, and outpatient and inpatient alcohol and drug treatment. The program has a big success in keeping repeat offenders from going back to jail and even releasing inmates in jail on early parole. Many inmates that have enrolled into this program have been released. At the time of the present analysis, the large majority (84.1 percent) of the jail diversion clients enrolled during the SAMHSA grant period had been discharged. Of these, most (68.8 percent) were discharged because they successfully completed treatment (City of St. Louis Jail Diversion Project Final Evaluation Report…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CrimeSolutions.gov is a website established by The National Institute of Corrections agency which is within the Department of Justice Programs. According to the website the program rates a green status which means it is effective. There are three ratings, Green which indicates a program is effective, Yellow gives the program a promising status, and red means that the program is not effective at all. An evaluation of the program was done in 2014, and the findings were conclusive, stating that the program worked (Willison, Brier, and Kim, 2014.). The researchers found that both Reentry programs within the Allegheny Program reduced arrest and the stabilization of the clients was noted. The findings of the programs were supported by evidence of implementation fidelity and the principles aligned with those considered effective intervention (Domurad et. al. 2010; Matthews et al. 2001) (as cited in Willison, et. al.,…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention report evaluated a study of outcomes for juveniles prosecuted in adult court rather than in juvenile court and found that there were counter-deterrent effects of transfer laws. Trying Juveniles as Adults, supra . A summary of six studies found that there was greater overall recidivism for juveniles prosecuted in adult court than juveniles whose crimes “matched” in juvenile court. Id. Juveniles in adult court also recidivated sooner and more frequently. Id. These higher rates of recidivism can be attributed to a variety of reasons, including lack of access to rehabilitative resources in the adult corrections system, problems when housed with adult criminals, and direct and indirect effects…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug courts were put into place to seek the underlying cause of drug addiction which many believe can also relate to drug related crimes. The first Drug Courts started in Dade County, Florida. Since 1989 Drug Courts have expanded to every state and there ae more than 2,100 working drug courts in the United States (Tiger, 2011 p. 172). The structure of all courts is different but there are three main common features in each court. The first being “Legal and external pressure” this means it is a judges duty to mandate or sentence a person to drug courts. Second there is a second judge that sits on the Drug Court committee that reviews progress each week and a probation officer that does random drug testing every week. Drug testing is a key factor so that there is an accountability factor on every member of Drug Court in order to stay clean. The third factor that all courts have in common is there is a verity of sanctions and privileges given to members of the courts. Sanctions for members that have broken the rules and privileges for those that have been doing good and continue on the right path and stay clean (Tiger…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case 6.4 Drug Dilemmas

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The cost of new medical drugs seems to be accepted by many people who use them. These pharmaceutical companies increase their profits more and more each year because many people assume that it does cost a lot of money for research and development. Where in reality, they are only spending about 15% of their profit margins on research and development alone. A huge percentage of these drugs are actually tested in other countries where people are more willing to do trials with these drugs because they cannot afford them. Not only are there more people who are more willing to try them, but also there is less regulation and oversight when it comes to testing. Conducting these clinical trials overseas not only saves money, but it also bypasses the requirement of the FDA approval before any human testing can be performed. Using Kant’s theory for determining what actions are considered morally right and wrong, we can look into his Categorical Imperatives. The first CI states, “Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it would become a universal law”. (McPhee 1) The second CI states, “Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end”. (McPhee 1) According to this case, we may now bring up several morally questionable actions that these pharmaceutical companies are doing. Is it okay for these companies to sell medical drugs at such a high cost? Should these pharmaceutical companies have a moral obligation to make drugs available to the country in which they perform research and development? Are these test subjects being exploited and being taken advantage of? Should pharmaceutical companies do their testing overseas? Now that we understand the situation at hand, we may come to believe that the pharmaceutical companies are acting in an immoral way according to the CI's. We can look further in…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Evolution of Risk Instruments have been used since the early 1980’s. The Post Conviction Risk Assessment also known as “PCRA,” was developed by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. The PCRA was created because 5 districts out of 16 chose to use a commercially available risk and needs tool. The AO got together with developers build the tool we call today PCRA specifically for federal probation. This tool was developed between October 1, 2005 and August 13, 2009. In the past few years social science has helped to discover a way to reduce the levels of recidivism. Using the method of PCRA, this greatly helps probation officers distinguish dangerous high risk offenders from low risk offenders. This assessment is done to keep communities…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Model

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Over the past two decades, specialized courts have resulted, according to Quinn (2009), in response to, the “problem solving court” movement (As cited in Cole and Getz, 2013). Such courts, Quinn (2009) noted, have come to focus on social concerns such as, addiction, domestic violence, and mental health issues, and have come to asset that such courts have cured addiction, addressed issues of intimate violence, prevented recidivism, reduced costs, and implied that they have even saved lives (As cited in Cole and Getz, 2013). Recently, however, such success stories have been called into question as modern court reformers have claimed that the assertions by the courts are misleading, as alternative experiences within and contrary opinions about…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Case Study

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1989 the first drug court was introduced in Miami Dade County, Florida. Drug problems in Florida were substantial and mirrored many states across the United States. Crack Cocaine was on the rise as so was the crime across the United States. The many types of drug courts have been put in place to decrease recidivism, drug use and restore lives and families. Drug Courts are designed to serve as the alternative for incarceration. A big factor in criminal justice is figuring out what programs work for the community which are the taxpayers, and the offenders we are serving and helping. Drug courts are very successful out of the many correctional programs that exist. First discussing the background model that a comprehensive range of drug courts…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States’ court system, jails, and prisons contain a significant number of offenders that have been convicted with drug related offenses, many of which are suffering from drug addictions. Drug abuse is becoming more prevalent, as drugs are becoming more and more readily accessible. Drug courts are a form of intervention used to treat drug-addicted offenders. Drug courts use the power and authority of a judge to keep a drug offender in treatment, providing rewards for successes and sanctions for failures. This form of intervention is used in order to reduce drug use, reduce crime, save money and restore lives.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Recidivism In Louisiana

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Approximately 15,000 state offenders are released from prison each year in Louisiana (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2013). Within five years, nearly half will find themselves back behind bars. As Louisiana has the highest incarceration rate in the world, this State is faced with serious challenges in handling its prison population. The recidivism rate is reasonably high, and the costs for taxpayers are billions of dollars; reducing recidivism in Louisiana is one of the first objectives of the current administration. As the incarceration population continues to grow, the state budget shrinks. Many inmates enter prison lacking education and adequate work experience, and are release with little more than a bus ticket. If inmates leave prison with…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays