Preview

Case Study: The First Family Drug Courts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: The First Family Drug Courts
Families are also affected by drug abuse. Sixty to eighty percent of child abuse and neglect cases involve substance abuse by a parent or guardian (Malroew, 2012) The first family drug court was stated back in 1995 in Reno, Nevada and since then there are only about 300 operating family drug courts in the United States. The average cost of foster care for one child in the state of Oregon it costs about seventy two dollars and eighty nine cents per day. In one year that is about twenty six thousand and six hundred dollars. If there is a family of four that is struggling with substance abuse and their children get placed in foster care that is about fifty three thousand two hundred dollars that the state and federal government shell out on children …show more content…
Interviewing him will assist with figuring out how the DWI court runs in turn figuring out how the Drug Court will run. These courts are run in the same manor: one is set up for alcoholics and one drug offenders. “While Canadian DTCs vary in their policies and treatment practices, the goal of DTCs is to stop drug dependent individuals from using drugs, thereby reducing recidivism and increasing public safety. Consequently, participants are to become, and remain, abstinent from drugs and alcohol and re-establish themselves as productive, non-crime committing citizens” (Lyons 2013, p.416). Before interviewing anyone, there needs to be a standard for all interviews so they are conducted in a proper manor.

Write down important questions that will be asked to each of the interviewees.
Check and set up office space where interviews can be conducted.
Send out reminders for each of the interviews in order to remind them of the
…show more content…
Drug courts were put into place to seek the underlying cause of drug addiction which many believe can also relate to drug related crimes. The first Drug Courts started in Dade County, Florida. Since 1989 Drug Courts have expanded to every state and there ae more than 2,100 working drug courts in the United States (Tiger, 2011 p. 172). The structure of all courts is different but there are three main common features in each court. The first being “Legal and external pressure” this means it is a judges duty to mandate or sentence a person to drug courts. Second there is a second judge that sits on the Drug Court committee that reviews progress each week and a probation officer that does random drug testing every week. Drug testing is a key factor so that there is an accountability factor on every member of Drug Court in order to stay clean. The third factor that all courts have in common is there is a verity of sanctions and privileges given to members of the courts. Sanctions for members that have broken the rules and privileges for those that have been doing good and continue on the right path and stay clean (Tiger

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Per the NADCP National Association of Drug Court Professionals objective is to transform millions of lives of defendants through addressing issues they face with anti-social behavior they display within the community. Per NADCP 492 Drug Courts existed. By June 30, 2012, 2,734 Drug Courts were operating in every U.S. state and territory (Finn, P., and A.K. Newlyn.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nsw Drug Court Case Study

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Drug Court of New South Wales was introduced in February 1999 as a 2-year-pilot program under the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW). After various evaluations it was decided to extend the pilot-program until 2004, with amendments being made to the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) in December 2002.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article, it looks at the effectiveness of drug courts compared to the more conventional court penalties on offenders. Kornhauser (2016) indicates how drug courts reduce offender’s chances reoffending by entering them into treatment programs, over incarceration. Kornhauser (2016) states there’s a lack of consistent evidence to prove this theory. Drug courts started its first rehabilitation program in NSW in 1999. Drug courts can now be found operating in other Australian jurisdictions to combat crime.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Most of the federal prisons in the Unites States are overcrowded, many are filled with drug users and suppliers. Stiffer penalties were put in place decades ago, which makes it mandatory the drug offenders go to prison. Judges and prosecutors can sentence according to an individual’s…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taxman, Faye S., and Jeffrey A. Bouffard. "Treatment as Part of Drug Court: The Impact…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most of the 500,000 children in foster care have been through the physical and emotional trauma, such as prenatal exposure to alcohol, tobacco and other drugs; parental abuse, neglect and abandonment; exposure to violence in their homes and communities; separation from their birth families; and frequent changes in foster placement. These experiences place children at great risk of developing physical, emotional and behavioral disorders that interfere with…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Not many people know what the Dept. of Correction’s requires for parolees released from prison into the community. Approximately three months before an inmate is released back into the community the Dept. of Corrections does a RISK Assessment to determine how much Community Supervision will be required and what risk that inmate is to the community in which they are released. Most inmates that are required to service time on community custody have a one year to five year commitment to community probation. All inmates placed on community custody are required to fulfill drug treatment, drug urinalysis testing , office visits anywhere from once a month to daily reporting to their specified probation officer, and a verified release address that follow the guidelines of housing a released inmate. Upon reporting to your probation officer, they may require a urinalysis for illegal substances that is against the inmates release plan. The Department of Corrections uses an instant urinalysis test that reflects what type of illegal drug was consumed and if it was in the last 36 hours. This instant drug screen test has been determined by researchers to be inaccurate. Yet after many researchers agree there is an issue with the accuracy of urinalysis testing, The Dept. of Correction’s continues to use this method because it is cost affective. It is more important to cost less than to be accurate. Although urinalysis drug testing is cost effective, it’s inaccuracy makes it an unfair method of testing for parolees.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Courts Case Study

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The purpose of drug courts was to develop provide rehabilitative programs that could Most drug court programs focus on low-level and non-violent offenders. Drug courts accept those charged with drug possession, tested positive for drugs, or had a known substance abuse problem during arrest. The courts could exclude defendants with current or prior violent convictions or other factors in their criminal…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Model

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Over the past two decades, specialized courts have resulted, according to Quinn (2009), in response to, the “problem solving court” movement (As cited in Cole and Getz, 2013). Such courts, Quinn (2009) noted, have come to focus on social concerns such as, addiction, domestic violence, and mental health issues, and have come to asset that such courts have cured addiction, addressed issues of intimate violence, prevented recidivism, reduced costs, and implied that they have even saved lives (As cited in Cole and Getz, 2013). Recently, however, such success stories have been called into question as modern court reformers have claimed that the assertions by the courts are misleading, as alternative experiences within and contrary opinions about…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead of overloading the traditional court system with to abundant amount of drug cases, involving the same faces of the reoffending drug abusers. The drugs courts were developed to take care of all of the drug cases to lighten the load on the traditional courts. Drugs courts can now spend more time with the offender to work to fix his or her substance abuse problems, by attending different meetings and programs. Drug courts have shown to be very…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Drug Court Cases

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The ARI-supported expanded drug court allows for a higher participation capacity and consists of drug court-dedicated staff and increased treatment availability. A drug court officer works solely with drug court program offenders, providing supervision/monitoring, drug testing, and implementation of cognitivebehavioral Thinking for a Change groups. A drug court attorney works with offenders, representing them from first appearance to the end of the program. The attorney attends the weekly drug court staffing, recommends sanctions/rewards, and assists offenders with ancillary legal issues, such as custody, tenant, and ordinance violation issues. A half-time program administrator facilitates the programs and manages communication among all drug court team members, a process formerly managed by the probation officer and treatment provider. Bridgeway operates “Bridges to Recovery,” a new drug court-dedicated treatment track. Bridgeway assesses potential participants within seven days of a drug court eligibility determination and recommends a level of treatment from detoxification to outpatient. For inpatient treatment, Bridgeway refers and provides transportation to the nearest treatment center (50 miles away) and maintains communication with the provider. For outpatient treatment, Bridgeway offers…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mass incarceration cant it really be compared to Jim Crow south? Michelle Alexander has reasons on believes of mass incarceration and the relationship to the Jim Crow south. Alexander talks about multiple things on how there related like what happened after prison and even about slavery and african americans.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States’ court system, jails, and prisons contain a significant number of offenders that have been convicted with drug related offenses, many of which are suffering from drug addictions. Drug abuse is becoming more prevalent, as drugs are becoming more and more readily accessible. Drug courts are a form of intervention used to treat drug-addicted offenders. Drug courts use the power and authority of a judge to keep a drug offender in treatment, providing rewards for successes and sanctions for failures. This form of intervention is used in order to reduce drug use, reduce crime, save money and restore lives.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Research Paper

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first drug court was established in Miami-Dade Florida in 1989. Drug courts were established because of the “revolving door of drug use” and recidivism. Recidivism is defined as criminals being prone to revert back to criminal behavior after being released from jail. Recidivism is very significant ito the Criminal Justice System because it shows the number of offenders that return to prison within a certain amount of time. Data shows that drug court participants are less likely to be arrested than other offenders. Approximately, 75% of drug court participants do not go back to prison until two years after leaving the program. Offenders that participate in Drug courts are usually nonviolent and suffer from substance abuse. The number of Drug courts around the world are continuously…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Appraisal

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With drug courts existing for over 25 years, some of the research presenting tangible results have been scarce. Because the structure of drug courts varies, not all of them are concerned with monitoring and improving their individual program even if it is imperative among the 10 key components. Some may find it challenging to implement strategies that will continuously evaluate programs due to lack of time and expertise (Rempel, 2010). Drug court professionals believe that the few evaluations that do exist do not necessarily influence practices or grant support from the public. However, what drug court professionals fail to realize is that there are ways for them to implement action research, a form of research that “provides immediate and useful feedback about everyday program operations and performance”, with limited resources and still retain information that can identify areas of success along with problem areas that need improvement (Rempel,…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays