Preview

What Are The Goals Of Drug Courts Different From Traditional Drug Courts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
571 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Goals Of Drug Courts Different From Traditional Drug Courts
Drug Courts have been around for a little under three decades now. “Dating back to 1989, the first drug court was established in Miami-Dade County, Florida” (NADCP, 2015). Once that first drug court system was set up it took off from there and drug courts were rapidly developed throughout the United States. The number of drug courts rose from the first drug court in 1989 to “2,734 drug courts by June 30, 2012” (NADCP, 2015). Drugs courts main goal is to try and treat the offender drug abuse problem using everyway possible. Instead of overloading the traditional court system with to abundant amount of drug cases, involving the same faces of the reoffending drug abusers. The drugs courts were developed to take care of all of the drug cases to lighten the load on the traditional courts. Drugs courts can now spend more time with the offender to work to fix his or her substance abuse problems, by attending different meetings and programs. Drug courts have shown to be very …show more content…
Both of the court systems have set goals that they plan to meet. “In the traditional courts a few individuals represent an offender in order to achieve their goal, where as with a drug court everyone works together to accomplished their set goal” (. The goals are not the same either, drug courts goals are to work with the offender to try and bring them back into society. Traditional courts focus on using fair and legal judgments to come to a conclusion a particular case. When it comes to the amount of attention or supervision each court system shows towards each defendant, drug courts show a substantial more amount of one on one time with the offender and a lot more supervision and control over the offender. Traditional courts on the other hand have little to no contact with each offender, which results in little to no supervision and control over the offender decisions outside the court

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Per the NADCP National Association of Drug Court Professionals objective is to transform millions of lives of defendants through addressing issues they face with anti-social behavior they display within the community. Per NADCP 492 Drug Courts existed. By June 30, 2012, 2,734 Drug Courts were operating in every U.S. state and territory (Finn, P., and A.K. Newlyn.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nsw Drug Court Case Study

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Drug Court of New South Wales was introduced in February 1999 as a 2-year-pilot program under the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW). After various evaluations it was decided to extend the pilot-program until 2004, with amendments being made to the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) in December 2002.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article, it looks at the effectiveness of drug courts compared to the more conventional court penalties on offenders. Kornhauser (2016) indicates how drug courts reduce offender’s chances reoffending by entering them into treatment programs, over incarceration. Kornhauser (2016) states there’s a lack of consistent evidence to prove this theory. Drug courts started its first rehabilitation program in NSW in 1999. Drug courts can now be found operating in other Australian jurisdictions to combat crime.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug courts were put into place to seek the underlying cause of drug addiction which many believe can also relate to drug related crimes. The first Drug Courts started in Dade County, Florida. Since 1989 Drug Courts have expanded to every state and there ae more than 2,100 working drug courts in the United States (Tiger, 2011 p. 172). The structure of all courts is different but there are three main common features in each court. The first being “Legal and external pressure” this means it is a judges duty to mandate or sentence a person to drug courts. Second there is a second judge that sits on the Drug Court committee that reviews progress each week and a probation officer that does random drug testing every week. Drug testing is a key factor so that there is an accountability factor on every member of Drug Court in order to stay clean. The third factor that all courts have in common is there is a verity of sanctions and privileges given to members of the courts. Sanctions for members that have broken the rules and privileges for those that have been doing good and continue on the right path and stay clean (Tiger…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taxman, Faye S., and Jeffrey A. Bouffard. "Treatment as Part of Drug Court: The Impact…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some similarities are that both courts issues sanctions, courts plea bargaining is often an option, the defendant has a due process rights in addition to unreasonable searches and seizures rights. Juvenile and adult offender receive Miranda rights at time of arrest.(Bartollas, Miller. 2008). Both courts use proof beyond a reasonable doubt as a standard for guilt or innocence. Boot camps is an option for both juveniles and adult offenders. Juvenile and adult courts have their crimes classified as either misdemeanors, felonies or infractions. Some of the differences between the juvenile and adult court system is that at the juvenile level parents have a very active role. The juvenile system refers to juvenile as delinquents, truants, orphans,…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The juvenile court system today resembles the adult court system in many ways. Although they have their similarities the fundamental foundations of each system clearly display two different outcomes. While the adult court looks to punish criminals, the juvenile court system looks to rehabilitate the individual.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hiller (1999), suggest that the main type of treatment program adapted within the United States prison system is the “In-prison Therapeutic Community”. This particular program sole intent is to house prisoners receiving treatment for drug and alcohol abuse separately from the general population throughout the prison. According to Hiller (1999), this programs foremost goal or function is to operate differently by adhering to stricter treatment protocols enhanced values and beliefs and to increase the functionality of the staff. They should also have shorter treatment durations and give emphasis to “self-help recovery and relapse prevention.” Hiller (2009), states that drugs and crimes are interrelated and that within the United States, over 68% of new arrestees test positive for illegal drugs; as the levels of illicit drug use increase as does the percentage of drug distribution and other…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are over two thousand drug courts in America, each one specializing in its own level of drug abuse. A drug court’s primary role is to handle cases with offenders of substance abuse. They offer offenders an opportunity to enter a rehabilitation program in lieu of sentenced jail time. The road to recovery is of course challenging and difficult, making the drug courts so strict and costly. Drug courts were generally created for non-violent drug abusers. Although these offenders are given the chance to avoid jail time they are extremely supervised by the court officials. Drug tests, substance abuse treatment, must make regular appearances in court and constant checkups are required to continue in the program. These offenders’ cases are usually dismissed due to their involvement in the program or their sentence is only shortened. Participation in these programs are completely voluntary and if qualified to enter, the offender must agree to complete all the tasks given and report to every summoning from the court. If an offender doesn’t complete the program, they can be prosecuted or their sentence will be revised and will be placed in jail. Drug courts are considered one f the most effective ways to eliminate drug abusers and avoiding incarceration. While in the program offenders are monitored and results of every drug court case is very astonishing, but the long term effect of these cases are beyond the rulings of the court. It is not known if those who participated in the programs continued their lives drug free. These courts have been examined and tested to see if the results justify the cost of the program. The operations evaluated such as the number of participants, referrals issued, and drug court graduates. The cost savings of processing the offenders through the program instead of straight jail time, and results compared with those who have been completed their sentenced jail time as opposed to those in the programs. The therapeutic jurisprudence theory…

    • 346 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today in our country our justice system runs by two models in order to keep peace and order to the public the first model is the determinate sentencing model what the Determinate model is when the judge is about to pass a sentence on to defendant and to address the problem with crimes that has been going around since the 1980s for example the government of some states in our country passed the three strike laws where when someone commits a crime that is considered serious then they get harsher sentences and to tell people who are more likely to commit the crime to don’t do it and it is not worth it . One of the pros for the determinate sentencing model is that the defendant could be eligible for probation, parole and alternative programs…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Model

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Over the past two decades, specialized courts have resulted, according to Quinn (2009), in response to, the “problem solving court” movement (As cited in Cole and Getz, 2013). Such courts, Quinn (2009) noted, have come to focus on social concerns such as, addiction, domestic violence, and mental health issues, and have come to asset that such courts have cured addiction, addressed issues of intimate violence, prevented recidivism, reduced costs, and implied that they have even saved lives (As cited in Cole and Getz, 2013). Recently, however, such success stories have been called into question as modern court reformers have claimed that the assertions by the courts are misleading, as alternative experiences within and contrary opinions about…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Case Study

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1989 the first drug court was introduced in Miami Dade County, Florida. Drug problems in Florida were substantial and mirrored many states across the United States. Crack Cocaine was on the rise as so was the crime across the United States. The many types of drug courts have been put in place to decrease recidivism, drug use and restore lives and families. Drug Courts are designed to serve as the alternative for incarceration. A big factor in criminal justice is figuring out what programs work for the community which are the taxpayers, and the offenders we are serving and helping. Drug courts are very successful out of the many correctional programs that exist. First discussing the background model that a comprehensive range of drug courts…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug Courts Recidivism

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page

    Drug courts seek to halt the revolving door of addiction and crime by linking addicted offenders to drug treatment and rigorous judicial monitoring. They bring together judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, treatment providers, and court staff in a collaborative effort to address the offender’s underlying substance use disorder and enforce compliance with court orders. Drug courts also use a system of graduated incentives and sanctions to help substance abusers achieve and maintain a drug-free life. Today, thanks to well-established evidence that drug courts reduce substance abuse and recidivism—including a groundbreaking study by researchers from the Center for Court Innovation—there are approximately 3,000 drug courts in the United States.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Drug Courts

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Drug Courts came about as a result of a backlogged court system and a steady, rapidly increasing prison population. Drug courts are a form of diversion that helps the offender through rehabilitation and the community through an increased sense of protection, which serves the best interest of everyone. Drug Courts are community based intermediate sanctions that incorporate treatment principles into the Criminal Justice System and divert drug offenders from traditional punishments of probation and prison. The objective of drug courts programs is to treat the underlying problems of addiction among drug offenders and eliminate participants' future drug use and crime.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays