Successful Reconstruction? As a whole‚ America has gone through many political changes and revolutionary movements. As history takes its course‚ though‚ most all of these “revolutionary movements” came to an end. One movement was Reconstruction. Reconstruction was a period in time when America was consisting of many leaders‚ goals and accomplishments. Eventually‚ it did come to an end‚ the result has been both a failure and a success. Reconstruction of the South‚ though‚ was definitely a failure
Premium
How successful was Elizabeth I in dealing with the foreign policy problems she was faced with in 1558-1603? By 1603‚ Elizabeth was ultimately successful with many of her aims in regard to foreign policy. Despite this‚ the monarch faced various set backs and failures in such affairs. The problems arose as she ruled an isolated protestant kingdom surrounded by catholic superpowers. She managed these difficulties with great pragmatism and opportunism‚ reducing the threat of invasion. Her aggressive
Premium Spanish Armada Elizabeth I of England Philip II of Spain
How successful was Henry VIII foreign policy. Anastasiya Sosis On this question there are two opposite views. First‚ traditional‚ is that Henry’s and Wolsey’s foreign policy was a complete failure; it was short-sighted‚ naïve‚ anachronistic and way too expensive. As John Guy said in 1988‚ Wolsey ‘overreached himself in diplomacy’. The other view‚ in contrast‚ is that Henry VIII and Cardinal Wolsey‚ although not reaching much success had a very practical‚ flexible and purposeful foreign policy
Premium England Henry VII of England Henry VIII of England
comparisons between Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. Notably‚ both of these dictators are known for their pitiless behaviour. As a result of an unparalleled level of authoritarianism‚ propaganda and endeavours to manipulate the citizens‚ these two dictators both possessed outright power. Each of these tyrants was compelled by innovative‚ debatable and exploitative ideologies about the supposed structure of the society and the world power. While Hitler and Stalin share some clear similarities‚ their personalities
Premium Nazi Germany Adolf Hitler Soviet Union
How successful were Stalin’s economic policies in the 1930s? Although it is unarguable to deny that there was certain economic progress in Stalinist Russia throughout the 1930s‚ it is understandable to postulate that the policies implicated under Stalin’s regime were merely introduced primarily to consolidate his political hold on the USSR. During this period‚ Stalin placed particular emphasis on Industrialisation and the abolition of older methods of peasant-controlled farming to be replaced with
Premium Soviet Union Vladimir Lenin
Early in the 1800’s most of Europe engaged in a revolution. The cause began with a food shortage crisis two years earlier‚ which escalated into social unrest against the ruling class. Food prices increased and wages remained the same. As net profits on goods decreased‚ unemployment increased and food prices remained high. People were angry with what was happening. Their unrest sparked a chain of events through various parts of Europe such as Germany‚ Austria‚ Czechoslovakia‚ Italy and Hungary. When
Premium French Revolution Europe Age of Enlightenment
Hitler gained control over Germany in the 1930’s‚ another European dictator had already come to power in Russia. Commonly known as Josef Stalin‚ a name that translates to mean the man of steel. Stalin‚ along with Hitler‚ was one of the most brutal men in recorded history. In relation to the criteria on ethical leadership constructed by Lino and myself‚ we believe that Stalin was a very unethical leader. According to his actions‚ it is clear‚ that Stalin failed in all aspects of our criteria. Born Iosef
Premium Soviet Union Joseph Stalin Vladimir Lenin
Mussolini was one of the most famous dictators of the 1900’s. He came from small to big within years‚ of being a politician‚ with the help of good connections. He was a very strong politician‚ and seemed like a good leader‚ but did not follow his word. The way mussolini fought wars‚ and ran the government were different then anyother leader. Mussolini had many opportunities to do different things‚ but he never decided to change his ways. He left his country with shame‚ and bring humiliation to his
Premium Benito Mussolini World War II Fascism
There are many different factors‚ caused by collectivisation‚ which could be seen as things that were overall successes for the Communist party because of things like the Gulags which helped industrialise Russia to where it was the most industrialised state at the start of the Second World War. It also helped Stalin gain control of the party by defeating his rivals on the right. On the other hand‚ collectivisation had many disastrous effects for the Communist Party‚ such as the great famines that
Premium Communist state Industrial Revolution Great Purge
How did Stalin use industrialisation and collectivisation to consolidate his power in the 1930s? Stalin used both collectivisation and industrialisation to consolidate power in Russia during the 1930s. Both policies allowed him to gain control over the economy‚ and to discredit or eliminate his rivals within the Communist Party. Without these programs‚ there could have been no totalitarian rule in Russia. Even before launching his economic program in 1929‚ Stalin used the industrialisation
Premium Soviet Union Marxism Vladimir Lenin