what it is and how it evolves‚ Penguin. Barabasi‚ A.L. (2003) Linked. Plume Books. Barabasi‚ A.L. (2010) Bursts: The hidden pattern behind everything we do‚ Dutton Books. Bollier‚ D. (2003). The Rise of Netpolitik – How the Internet is changing International Politics and Diplomacy‚ The Aspen Institute Communication and Society Program. Burns‚ T. and Ueberhorst‚ R. (1988) Creative Democracy: Systematic Conflict Resolution and Policymaking In a World of High Science and Technology‚ Praeger Publishers
Premium Democracy Information technology Technology
Theory on the field of international politics through: 1. Has the new construct‚ model‚ idea‚ or theory provided an explanation more powerful and more parsimonious than what existed previously? 2. Has this way of looking at the problem proven more valid than the alternatives? 3. Has the new idea influences the creation of other ideas and the undertaking of new work? 4. Are such extensions successful? Rejects 3 fundamental assumptions of the realist angle: 1. International system is governed
Premium International relations
Building Democracy After Conflict THE CASE FOR SHARED SOVEREIGNTY Stephen D. Krasner Stephen D. Krasner is Graham H. Stuart Professor of International Relations and director of the Center on Democracy‚ Development‚ and the Rule of Law at Stanford University. His books include Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (1999) and Problematic Sovereignty (2001). ne of the major foreign policy challenges of the contemporary era‚ indeed perhaps the major challenge‚ is how to encourage the development
Premium Democracy International relations World War II
-4- Not only would the people not heal from their injuries and illnesses‚ but their condition may worsen with the lack of resources. Fortunately‚ national health professionals‚ often supported by local and international NGOs‚ UN agencies‚ and other partners‚ responded immediately. International organizations tried their best to help these countries in need and it has had a major impact on improvement of the countries standard of living. Disease surveillance and early warning systems have fulfilled
Premium United States World War II International relations
a particular country. In his early definition‚ Nye (1990‚ p. 167) considered that soft power had a co-optive dimension which meant " getting others to want what you want" through soft power resources such as "cultural attraction‚ ideology‚ and international institutions" (ibid). Further he defined co-optive power as "the ability of a country to structure a situation so that other countries develop preferences or define their interests in ways consistent with its own" (ibid‚ p. 169). As the literature
Premium International relations
possible the risk of significant harm. International litigation has always seen majority of States accepting the existence of a duty to take precautionary and preventive measures against activities which may cause transboundary harm. The Applicant contends that the Precautionary Principle entails the obligation on states to undertake or to cease from undertaking any activity which may harm the environment. In order to establish custom under International law‚ it is important to establish a general
Premium United Nations Law United States
ACCOUNTING Harmonization of Accounting Standards Samir S. Mogul < E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y > ◆ International community has long back recognised the need for moving towards harmonisation of the accounting standard across the globe. Obviously on individual country is always entitled to costomise the existing international accounting Standards according to its specific needs. Among other advantages of harmonisation of accounting standards‚ the two benefits which tops the list are (a)
Premium International Financial Reporting Standards International Accounting Standards Board International relations
there is probably a near consensus amongst realists that the international system can be periodized as multipolar up to 1945‚ and then bipolar up to 1989. Unfortunately the assessment of polarity has become problematic since the end of the Cold War (Buzan and Little‚ 2000:391). Understanding the polarity of the international system may help us to have a better understanding the power distribution and the states’ behavior in the international political arena. This article will argue the post-Cold War
Premium United States World War II Cold War
The US role in 21st century world affairs must shape an international community that benefits US interests‚ and is neither dependent on nor antagonistic to US global supremacy. The US may achieve this by relying on soft power and the influence of our global allies and competitors to accomplish our national security goals. America should lead world affairs through cooperation and sharing of our ideals to solve geopolitical problems‚ rather than relying primarily on our military preeminence. The
Premium International relations Superpower
process. Political processes can be analysed in terms of Actors involved in the processes‚ their interests and their relative power (AIP). Actors: Political‚ Societal(land‚ labour‚ capital‚ business associations‚ unions‚ students‚ military)‚ International (hegemon‚ institutions) Interests: Assume‚ Deduce or Judge by stated intention and observed behaviour. Power: voter base‚ past performance‚ military control‚ resource control‚ shared nationalism/ethnicity‚ moral authority‚ int’l support Usually
Premium European Union International relations Liberalism