The outcomes which arise when they fail to adequately exercise a duty of care are often disastrous. A study prepared for the national study into racist violence found that over 80 per cent of Aboriginal juveniles in detention centres in New South Wales‚ Queensland and Western Australia alleged that they had been assaulted by police on at least one occasion (Cunneen‚ 1991). In addition‚ there was a strong tendency on the part of those interviewed to see the violence as
Premium Indigenous Australians Australia Indigenous peoples
through our lives; some of us observe ourselves in circumstances rather worse than that of most individuals. One of those situations is observed in the event of receiving an imprisonment sentence. On top of the sentence itself‚ the stigmatism of having a confinement record can make life very challenging - but‚ of course‚ in detention centers‚ one can ’t earn a considerable wage at all. Probation and Parole When a person perpetrates a crime worthy of a jail punishment‚ that person is sentenced to a particular
Premium Prison Parole Criminal law
committing rape shall be given rigorous imprisonment which may range from seven years to life term. •Punishment for rape that leads to death or vegetative state should be given rigorous imprisonment ranging from not less than 20 years to the remaining life of a convict. •Crimes like gang-rape shall entail punishment ranging from not less than 20 years to whole life of the convict. •Gang-rape causing death of the victim shall amount to life imprisonment for the convict. •The crimes such as
Premium Police Sexual intercourse Rape
that Guantanamo detainees have a right to access U.S. courts under the habeas corpus Suspension Clause‚ the Court invalidated legislation by Congress seeking to deprive them of that right and deny them a fair hearing to challenge their continued imprisonment.” (Hafetz‚2011). Even terrorists and combatants are given the right to a fair trial. When Congress enacted the Antiterrorism Act in response to perceived abuses of the writ of habeas corpus‚ it exercised its Exceptions Clause power under Article
Premium Supreme Court of the United States President of the United States United States
Thesis statement: This case of the Shermans v. Church of the Divine Light. According the case‚ the Shermans claim that their minor child has been the victim of illegal detention and intentional infliction of emotional distress and among other torts. They seek to be compensated for all the damages that such detention have brought to their minor child as well as the medical and other expenses they incurred in getting him away from the church and “bringing him” from their intentional “brainwashing”
Premium Tort law Tort Common law
been brought into focus in the past decade. In the years since the September 11‚ 2001 terrorist attacks‚ hundreds of people have been detained by the United States government as part of its war on terror. Most of these detainees face indefinite detention and have neither been charged with a crime nor afforded prisoner of war status. Habeas corpus serves to protect citizens against arbitrary arrest‚ torture‚ and extrajudicial killings and is a fundamental personal liberty guaranteed by our Constitution
Premium Habeas corpus Laws of war United States
1-2886825 Appendix 4. http://www.theguardian.com/law/2010/oct/27/detention-without-access-lawyer-scotland-ends Appendix 5. http://www.theguardian.com/law/2011/sep/16/secret-trial-scotland-disturbing-development Appendix 6. http://www.scotsman.com/news/3000-cases-chucked-out-as-no-action-by-prosecutors-1-1776254 Appendix 7. http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2011HCJ001.html Appendix 8. Detention under S 14 Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 Under S 14 a Constable
Premium Criminal law Crime
PROHIBITION OF TORTURE AND EXCLUSION OF ILLEGALLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE “A journey of a thousand miles began with a single step” (千里之行，始于足下). 1. Introduction From the Western point of view China’s Criminal Justice System has a large number of deficiencies[1]. The case of prohibition of torture and exclusion of illegally obtained evidence was not exempt from those criticisms. On 2009‚ the Executive Director of the Asia Program at Human Rights Watch‚ says: “The criminal justice system remains
Free Criminal law Law Crime
statutes‚ and this principle has been applied even to preventive-detention laws passed under Arts. 149 and 150‚ with the result that persons detained under such security legislation‚ as well as persons arrested under the ordinary criminal law‚ enjoy many of the rights contained in Art. 5.4 The difference is that legislation may be inconsistent with Art.5 and yet remain constitutionally valid. The law relating to preventive detention is of such importance for personal liberty in Malaysia that it
Premium Law Human rights Common law
are the‚ three main functions of a modern prison organization. For over 100 years‚ there was emphasis on custody which‚ it was believed‚ depended on good order and discipline. The notion of prison discipline was to make imprisonment deterrent. Gradually‚ the objective of imprisonment changed from mere deterrence to deterrence and reformation. Crime is the outcome of a diseased mind and jail must have an environment of hospital for treatment and care. - Mahatma Gandhi A prison‚ jail or correctional
Premium Human rights Universal Declaration of Human Rights