MEMORANDUM TO: Chief Financial Officer FROM: Controller DATE: August 4‚ 1990 SUBJECT: How to Report Earthquake Damages in the Income Statement CHHS Inc. has suffered extensive damages due to the after math of the October 17‚ 1989 San Francisco Bay Area earthquake that hit at a 7.1 magnitude on the Richter scale. Twelve of the twenty-two stores have been closed for a varying period of time due to the large damages that occurred. In total‚ damages have summed to
Premium Earthquake Income statement San Francisco Bay Area
Case 9-23 1. a. Sales budget: April May June Quarter Budgeted sales in units 35‚000 45‚000 60‚000 140‚000 Selling price per unit × $8 × $8 × $8 × $8 Total sales $280‚000 $360‚000 $480‚000 $1‚120‚000 b. Schedule of expected cash collections: February sales $ 48‚000 $ 48‚000 March sales 112‚000 $ 56‚000 168‚000 April sales 70‚000 140‚000 $ 70‚000 280‚000 May sales 90‚000 180
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Net income
Income Statement Income statements present an ordered list‚ grouped by broad categories of revenues and expenses. The income statement begins with revenues followed by a list of expenses. U.S. GAAP and IFRS requirements for the presentation of income statements are similar‚ with some important differences. *Other than separating revenues from expenses‚ U.S. GAAP provides little guidance about which items the firm must separately display or their order. IFRS requires‚ at a minimum‚ the
Premium Income statement Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Revenue
Escareno Corporation has provided its contribution format income statement for June. The company produces and sells a single product. Sales (8‚400 units): ($) 764‚400 Variable expenses: ($) 445‚200 Contribution margin: ($) 319‚200 Fixed expenses: ($) 250‚900 Net operating income: ($) 68‚300 If the company sells 8‚200 units‚ its total contribution margin should be closest to: Merchandise with a sales price of $500 is sold on account with term 2/10‚ n/30. The journal entry to record the sale would
Premium Revenue Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Costs
CASE FORMAT KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS‚ INC. --- 2004 1. Title Page a. Case title b. Group Members c. Class schedule d. Term and school year e. Date submitted 2. Content a. 1-page Case Summary b. Proposed Vision and Mission Statement for KKD c. External Audit --- EFE Matrix d. Competitors Analysis --- CPM e. Financial Ratio Analyses f. Internal Audit --- IFE Matrix aveA Case Study on Krispy Kreme Doughnuts‚ Inc A Case Study on Krispy Kreme Doughnuts‚ Inc ________________________________________
Premium Management Education Marketing
Contents 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Background of the case................................................................................. 3 1.3 Statement of the problem............................................................................. 3 1.4 Objectives..................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Case analysis....................
Premium Marketing
Risk factors. 3 1.2 Financial Risk factors. 3 1.3 Economic Risk factors. 4 1.4 Political Risk factors. 4 1.5 Global/International Risk factors. 4 1.6 Management Risk factors. 5 1.7 Technology Risk factors. 5 1.8 Operation Risk factors. 5 2. Dunkin Brands 2.1 Business and Industry Risk factors. 5 2.2 Financial Risk factors. 6 2.3 Economic Risk factors. 8 2.4 Political Risk factors. 8 2.5 Global/International Risk factors. 8 2.6 Management Risk factors. 9 2.7 Technology Risk factors. 9 2
Premium Risk Dunkin' Donuts Coffee
Assessable income=ordinary income + statutory income. Ordinary income: income deriving from the courts (s6-5) Negative propositions: items that are not income by ordinary concepts: 1.Amounts not convertible into money :In Tennant v Smith (1892) free accommodation provided to a bank manager was held not to be ordinary income because building could not be sub-let and the benefit thereby converted to money. In FCT v Cooke & Sherden (1980) an incentive prize offered by a manufacturer was not income of the
Premium Taxation Tax Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
E4-4 (Multiple-Step and Single-Step) Two accountants for the firm of Allen and Wright are arguing about the merits of presenting an income statement in a multiple-step versus a single-step format. The discussion involves the following 2012 information related to Webster Company ($000 omitted). Administrative expense Officers’ salaries $4‚900 Depreciation of office furniture and equipment 3‚960 Cost of goods sold 63‚570 Rent
Premium Revenue Income statement Income
Company G Comparative Income Statements December 31‚ Years 12 and 11 Year 12 #N/A #N/A #N/A Year 11 123‚708‚000 86‚409‚000 37‚299‚000 25‚827‚000 222000 2‚316‚000 28‚365‚000 #N/A 23‚478‚000 267000 2‚163‚000 25‚908‚000 11‚391‚000 2‚349‚000 -45‚000 153‚000 2‚457‚000 2‚261‚231 10.01% -16.85% 7.07% 9.48% 19.85% 183000 384000 -201000 #N/A 117000 366000 -249000 11‚142‚000 66‚000 18‚000 48‚000 2‚309‚231 66.41% 4.92% -19.28% 20.73% 5‚052‚000 #N/A 4‚419‚000 6‚723‚000 633‚000 1‚676‚231 14.32% 24
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Revenue Balance sheet