FIRST DIVISION G.R. No. L-107819 December 17‚ 1993 EFREN ANCIRO‚ petitioner‚ vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES and THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS‚ respondents. Franco L. Loyola for petitioner. The Solicitor General for the People of the Philippines. DAVIDE‚ JR.‚ J.: The principal issue raised in this petition is the propriety of the trial court’s denial of a motion to strike out the testimony of the private complainant whose cross examination was not finished because she had left for abroad
Premium 1984 Appellate court 1918
the application of Lamb) v Ministry of Justice R. (on the application of AM) v DPP Also known as: Nicklinson v Ministry of Justice Supreme Court 25 June 2014 Case Analysis Where Reported [2014] UKSC 38; [2014] 3 W.L.R. 200; [2014] 3 All E.R. 843; [2014] 3 F.C.R. 1; [2014] H.R.L.R. 17; 36 B.H.R.C. 465; (2014) 139 B.M.L.R. 1; Times‚ June 26‚ 2014; Official Transcript Case Digest Subject: Criminal law Other related subjects: Criminal procedure; Human rights; Health Keywords: Assisted suicide; Codes of practice; Director
Premium Human rights Suicide European Convention on Human Rights
group to define a recovery plan when it occurs. For example‚ the executive should divide their works into different parts so they can react at the first time when problem happen instead of wasting time on contact each other or ask how to do so. In this case‚ if they consider the attack happen in advance‚ the problem that the executive cannot get into Qdata center because of the authority issue would not
Premium Problem solving Attack Attack!
38.0% Bins 17-24 2‚000 75.9% Bins 25-27 1‚200 126.6% Total holding 7200 21.1% Destoning 4‚500 33.8% Dechaffing 4‚500 33.8% Drying 1‚050 144.6% Separation 1‚200 126.6% Trucks Total Lbs Total bbls Per day 243 1‚834‚020 18‚340 Per hour 20 152‚835 1‚528 Per minute 2‚547 25 Throughput 1‚519 Dumping Capacity # of Converyors Minutes Avg bbl p/truck Avg bbl p/hr 5 10 75 2‚250 Holding Bins 1-16 Bins 17-24 Bins 25-27
Premium Capacity utilization Time
AssetsGuard Case Executive summary: Based on given conditions our recommendation is to launch AssetsGuard insurance product line for the following reasons: * product’s contribution margin under conservative estimates is at 79% which represent a very lucrative product profitability * estimated sales of AssetsGuard are at 8‚759 new policies for the next year at monthly premium of $18.74 will generate revenue of $1‚969‚684 with 26.5% profit margin * monthly premium price of $18.74 (market
Premium Pricing Marketing Variable cost
2012August 2012 Red Brand Canners Red Brand Canners was a medium-size company that was specialised in canning and distributing a variety of fruit and vegetable products under private brand names in the western states of the US. On Monday‚ September 13th‚ Mitchell Gordon‚ Vice-President of Operations‚ asked the Controller‚ the Sales Manager‚ and the Production Manager of Red Brand Canners to meet with him to discuss the amount of tomato products to pack that season. The tomato crop‚ which had
Premium Tomato
200607-MM-Case-Assignments.doc 1/9 Multinational Management –Case Assignments Case Studies & Case Assignments General Remarks • • • The following questions are to be considered as “guiding questions”. That is‚ these questions will stimulate discussion within each group. However‚ groups are encouraged to use a managerial and problem-oriented framework (see “Notes on Case Analysis”) for their presentations and integrate conceptual thinking as much as possible (evidence of some wider
Premium Harvard Business School Strategic management Case study
Lindsey Perine MKTG 379 MW 10am February 8‚ 2012 Case 1 Summary- The Coop BACKGROUND AND PROBLEM STATEMENT The Chicken Coop is a restaurant started back in 1974 by CEO‚ Daryl Buckmeister. Chicken Coop is a quick service restaurant chain with sales growing at about 10% per year. In 1995‚ sales sporadically were down in 20 of the 76 stores. These 20 stores had consistently been the strongest stores accounting for 32% of retail sales. The main issue is management needs to formulate a strategy
Premium Chicken Meat Bird
Briefing the Case Assignment In the renowned Supreme Court Case of Jackson vs. Birmingham Board of Education‚ the rule of law was held to be that retaliating against a person because he has complained of being discriminated on the grounds of sex falls under a branch of intentional sex discrimination‚ which is encompassed by Title IX‚ Education Amendments of 1972. This was an important case with respect to intentional sex discrimination and never before had such principle of law been enunciated
Premium Complaint Discrimination Pleading
to estimate the debt rating and the implied probability of default for the debt. The debt rating that UST will receive depends on the amount of debt UST takes on. The table below shows the calculated key financial ratios possible for the given case data. It shows that the debt rating decreases from Scenario I to III. In addition to the quantitative approach‚ the bond rating agencies will likely look at other aspects of UST’s business. They see that there are consistent cash flow‚ earnings
Premium Bond Debt Finance