Examine how utilitarian arguments might be applied to one issue of your choice? ACT UTILITARIANISM Act Utilitarian theories start with specific cases from which general principles can be deduced. Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus weighs up the following measures of the consequential pleasure/pain: CertaintyDurationExtentIntensityRemotenessRichnessPurity Situation 1 – Abortion would be morally right if the mother’s life is in danger. The period of the pain of the loss of the mother will be ongoing‚ the
Premium Utilitarianism Immanuel Kant Morality
There is a very clear way that any sophisticated utilitarian could handle this proposal. Obviously‚ they have to consider that the limited sports program needs to be incorporated‚ but at the same time they can’t cut too heavily into the current sports program. There is a very clear plan that would allow the physically impaired student to have their new sport program added‚ without greatly hindering the current sports program. It has been said that the cost of the new program is four times as high
Premium Fundraising Disability
Final word count: 1597 A. THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE For this case‚ I will be using Kantian ethics to pinpoint the rationally correct action to take. Before discussing Kantian ethics in relation to the case‚ we must first explore what Kantian ethics is. Kantian ethics comes from the deontological school of thought‚ which focuses on the moral correctness of the act in itself (Johnson‚ 2013). This means that the judgment on the act is done a priori. This is contrasted to the consequentialist school
Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative
attempt to substantiate Immanuel Kant’s view on animal morality and justify how his philosophy is not in violation of speciesism. Furthermore‚ I will explain how the Kantian view still grants animals some moral consideration through the designation of “indirect duties”. Lastly‚ I will present a difficulty with accepting the Kantian view of “indirect duties” towards animals. Moral quandaries regarding animals are still demanding the attention of many philosophers as they attempt to modify and inspect
Premium Morality Immanuel Kant
ethical problems within utilitarianism. Kantian theory follows the same principle but with greater emphasis on the respect for all things involved with ethical quandaries. Both have their critiques yet both ideas are conceived in an effort to understand and conceptualize some of the biggest controversies and questions that evolve around ethics. This paper will be an attempt to delineate the key components that fabricate each theory‚ first utilitarianism and then Kantian theory and through examples and practical
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Morality
According to Kant‚ everything that we can think of as desirable or good are not good in themselves‚ rather they qualify or are thought of as being good. Example of such things that are considered as good or desirable include intelligence‚ wit‚ temperament‚ wealth‚ and health etc. All these things are not good in themselves as they can also be used for bad purposes. These things only qualify as good when used to achieve a good outcome. Therefore‚ according to Kant‚ the only thing that can be thought
Free Morality Law Ethics
Philosophy 338 Professor Hubin THE UTILITARIAN THEORY OF PUNISHMENT I. Utilitarian Theories of Punishment: Utilitarian justifications are forward-looking (consequentialistic) in nature. All of the questions about the justification of punishment (general justification‚ title and severity) will be answered by appeal to the utility (value) of the consequences of an action. A. The General Justification: All punishment is‚ according to the utilitarian‚ intrinsically bad‚ because it involves the
Free Crime Punishment Criminology
Teleology‚ an explanation of phenomena by the purpose they serve rather than postulated causes‚ has found its place in the construction of many systems of morality such as John Stuart Mill’s theory of Utilitarianism. In teleological approaches to morality‚ questions of right and wrong‚ or the notion what an individual ought to do‚ are determined by the consequences of a given action. One thinker to reject this idea of consequentialism was Immanuel Kant. In his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of
Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant
Ebin Thomas sunny Student ID: 717537 MANA6320-01 A Kantian Approach to Business Ethics The writer here talks about a man named Kant who lived in the 18th Century and is best known for defending a version of the “respect for persons” principle which implies that any business practice that puts money on a par with people is immoral or unethical. Kant argued that the highest good was the goodwill. To act from a good will is to act from duty. Thus it is the intention behind an action rather than its
Premium Ethics John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism
Is the prohibition on torture an absolute moral rule? Chapter 9: The Categorical Imperative (Annex D- “Elements of Moral Philosophy”) Wk 11 29th & 31st Oct Kantian Ethics: Good will‚ cont’d Categorical and Hypothetical Imperative‚ Duty‚ Rational Nature‚ Just War- Just peace‚ Terror‚ Punishment Is the prohibition on aiming at the death of a harmless person an absolute moral rule? Is the prohibition on torture
Premium Management Ethics Business ethics