Kantianism : Categorical imperative I : Scenario 1 Proposed rule: (I may lie to use the private library’s PCs with the intention of getting a full scholarship to attend a prestigious university.) In this case. “I can lie with the intention of getting good grades and a scholarship.” • The person in trouble wants his lie to be believed so she gets what she needs – in this case to use the unused private library’s PC’s connected with the net to research and get good grades and later a scholarship
Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Philosophy
sometimes seems useless. However; if this were to be applied as a general rule then no one would ever get help unless the Samaritan deemed it profitable to them. Both of these show how decision making in Kantianism is the key factor in deciding what to do. There are both good and bad sides to Kantianism. First‚ as stated previously‚ we need to do things based on moral reasoning and not just end results. We can’t be officers who can go to the limit of Utilitarianism and allow for things such as an Omelas
Premium Critical thinking Morality Value theory
This essay certainly made your stance on the questions asked known. I appreciated the quick reference to utilitarianism and Kantianism when tackling the first question‚ however‚ some further expansion was definitely needed. In the laborer’s example‚ it is important to know that such strict personal accountability would not work in White-Collar jobs. It is standard for White-Collar workers to be indemnified by their company for any problems that may arise while performing within the capacity of their
Premium Management Employment Ethics
Moral Reasoning - Aim: Equip students to become critically minded citizens who have the ability to think through the big moral and political questions we all confront as citizens Kant (Deontology) - Rejects utilitarianism: They were half right- of course we seek to avoid pain‚ and seek pleasure. But to think that pain and pleasure drives our behavior. - Thinks that the individual person has a dignity that commands our respect- because we are rational beings‚ capable of reason.; and autonomous
Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative
decision-making process‚ Al utilizes moral standards‚ which takes priority over both the self interest of Al or Craig. With that in mind‚ let’s analyze the decision “What should Al do with Craig” using two popular normative theories‚ Utilitarianism and Kantianism. Using the theory of Utilitarianism‚ Al should determine all possible alternatives‚ and then implement the alternative that creates the most happiness (or the least unhappiness) for all parties involved. In this analysis‚ we will consider 3 different
Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Decision theory
In the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals‚ by Immanuel Kant‚ Kant proposes a very significant discussion of imperatives as expressed by what one “ought” to do. He implies this notion by providing the audience with two kinds of imperatives: categorical and hypothetical. The discussion Kant proposes is designed to formulate the expression of one’s action. By distinguishing the difference between categorical and hypothetical imperatives‚ Kant’s argues that categorical imperatives apply moral conduct
Premium Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant Morality
Nietzsche’s views run along similar lines. Not only morals do pervade life spheres‚ but‚ they derive their normative force values with which they are associated . However‚ this values are not the “ground zero” of morality: as Schacht puts is ’[…] for Nietzsche […] all normativity is ultimately of extra-moral origin. For Nietzsche that ultimate origin – the Ur-source of all normativity – is to be found in the basic disposition he takes to be operative in all that transpires in this world‚ which he
Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics
Outline and evaluate Kants categorical imperative (25 marks) Kant’s categorical ethics is a deontological theory of ethics‚ this means that the actions are either intrinsically right or intrinsically wrong‚ this is due to absolute law; the outcome of the situation is not important to Kant’s theory even if the outcome may be good. Kant has a deontological theory because he believes that you must stick to the moral rules and beliefs that you have no matter what the turn out. An example of this would
Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative
Final word count: 1597 A. THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE For this case‚ I will be using Kantian ethics to pinpoint the rationally correct action to take. Before discussing Kantian ethics in relation to the case‚ we must first explore what Kantian ethics is. Kantian ethics comes from the deontological school of thought‚ which focuses on the moral correctness of the act in itself (Johnson‚ 2013). This means that the judgment on the act is done a priori. This is contrasted to the consequentialist school
Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative
Kant’s Right Theory is based on a moral principle which is called the categorical imperative‚ which means to treat people freely and equally. In his first categorical imperative‚ he argued that we should act in a way only if our maxim became a universal law. (Midterm‚ P2) Maxim is the reason that some made a choice in a certain situation‚ and by looking at this maxim universally and reversely‚ we could determine rather this maxim is a universal law or not. In his second categorical imperative‚ we
Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Philosophy