"all the world"‚ in which case the offeree is regarded as a member of the general public: Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball When an offer is made‚ the term of the proposed contract must be communicated to the offeree: Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking However‚ an offer can be made in general terms‚ leaving the precise terms of the contract to be settled later: Master v Cameron The fact that the word ’offer’ is used is not itself conclusive: B Seppelt & Sons Ltd v Commissioner for Main Roads An offer
Premium Contract
Business Scenarios and Case Problems 9-1. Contracts by Minors…Discuss Kalen’s liability in this situation. Kalen is a seventeen year old boy who rented an apartment for $500 a month‚ after consistently paying for rent for 4 months‚ he decides to return the key and not pay rent for the rest of the remaining months on the contract. I would think that this is classified as “disaffirmance”. Since he is seventeen‚ and a minor when he leaves the apartment‚ he is able to legally avoid his contractual obligation
Premium Family Death of a Salesman The Play
PROJ598 – Contract and Procurement Management Request for Proposal Seeds-a-Million Inventory Control System Jennifer Pattison Missenu03@yahoo.com PM598 – March‚ 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS 3 1.1. General Description of Work 3 1.2. What Must Be Included with Bid 3 1.3. Schedule of Bid Period Activities 3 1.4. Location of Work 3 1.5. Pre-Bid Meeting 4 1.6. Owner Contact for Questions 4 1.7. Pre-Award Surveys 4 1.8. Sealed Bid Requirements 4
Premium Contract
Vicarious Liability Monday‚ January 12‚ 2015 10:00 PM Vicarious Liability is where one person is held liable for the torts of another. This is usually where an employer is liable for the torts of employee. For the employer to be liable: i) A tort‚ (such as negligence‚ battery or even in breach of statutory duty (Majrowski v Guys and St Thomas’s NHS Trust 2007)) ii) committed by his employee‚ iii) during the course of employment. • Original defendant (employee) must be liable in tort first Prepared
Premium Tort law Strict liability Negligence
CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND: 1 2. CONTRACT: 1 2.1 VALID CONTRACT: 2 2.2 VOID CONTRACT: 2 2.3 VOIDABLE CONTRACT: 2 3. SALES CONTRACT: 3 3.1 SUBJECT MATTER (MAL): 3 3.2 CLASSIFICATION OF MAL: 4 3.3 CONDITIONS OF VALIDITY OF SALE: 4 3.4 PROHIBITED SALES: 7 3.5 KINDS OF SALE TRANSACTIONS: 10 3.5.1 BAY AL MUQAYADAH: 11 3.5.2 BAY AL MUTLAQ: 11 3.5.3 BAY AL SARF: 12 3.5.4 SALAM CONTRACT: 13 3.5.5 ISTISNA 16 3.5.6 MURABAHAH 19 3.5.7 BAY’AL-MUAJJAL 22 4
Premium Contract Muhammad Money
1. Voidable Contract: An agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the parties thereto‚ but not at the option of the other or others‚ is a voidable contract. A contract is voidable when one of the parties to the contract has not exercised his free consent. One of the essential elements of a formation of a contract for example‚ free consent‚ is absent. All voidable contracts are those which are induced by coercion fraud or misrepresentation. The person whose consent is
Premium Contract
web address Building.co.uk. A design and build project allows the low risk factor as for the client has the contractor takes on the risk by offering a fixed cost contract. The web address designbuild-network.com states the original provision for a building cost was around £352m‚ with total project costs of £757m. A fixed price contract protects the client from any expiring costs‚ for example if the construction of the stadium was to have any over runs or delays. The main contractor building Wembley
Premium Construction Architect Building
Big Fat Liability 2. In your opinion‚ should the food and restaurant industries be held liable for the rise of obesity‚ or not? That is‚ which side do you support and why? The food and restaurant industries should not be held solely reliable for the rise of obesity. The individual should hold some responsibility for the foods they chose to consume. If it’s a minor that is obese than the parents should hold responsibility because they play a large role in the foods they eat. Restaurants
Premium Nutrition
Doctrine: Limitations in Establishing Corporate Criminal Liability The identification doctrine is the traditional method by which companies are held liable under the principles of the common law. According to this theory‚ the solution for the problem of attributing the unlawful acts to a corporation for offences that require intention was to merge the identified individual with the corporation. For the purpose of establishing corporate liability‚ a company may be responsible for the wrongful acts of
Premium Criminal law Corporation Crime
1. Introduction – What is a Contract? 1.1 Definitions Not all agreements will be contract enforceable in law - social arrangements‚ for example‚ or contracts which offend against public decency and public policy and those which involve criminal activity. ‘A contract is an agreement giving rise to obligations which are enforced or recognised by law. The factor which distinguishes contractual from other legal obligations is that they are based on the agreement of the contracting parties.’ Treitel
Premium Contract