Machiavelli’s Prince‚ individuals were naïve. Individuals believed in a power to rule them‚ rather than standing up and thinking for themselves. While Machiavelli and Hobbes believed in instilling fear into their citizens‚ Socrates believed in equality and justice. Socrates would disagree with Machiavelli and Hobbes’ societies because they were run by the same government that Socrates was fighting against. In Machiavelli’s Prince‚ the Prince acts as the ruling power over naïve individuals. The Prince believes
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence
Niccolo Machiavelli in his writing The Prince ([1532] 2006) and Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan ([1651]2009). Even though they both talk about critical thinking‚ they have two different views about critical thinking. Machiavelli points out‚ those critical thinking gains you power and Hobbes points out that limiting your critical thinking will keep you in power. Gaining power and keeping the power you gained are very difficult and the way Machiavelli and Hobbes approaches are different. Machiavelli mentions
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Philosophy
have books and different thoughts about government and authority. One of them is Machiavelli who is reputed with his book the Prince’. This book includes some advice to leaders. Machiavelli claims in Prince’ (chapter XVI‚ XVII‚ XVIII) that a prince should be miser than liberal‚ should prefer being feared rather than being loved‚ and should not be faithful. In my opinion‚ a leader shuld not be miser and should prefer being loved than feared and should be faithful; in contrast‚ a leader should be liberal
Premium Political philosophy Leadership Love
order to acquire a certain level of understanding life as we have mentioned before; in this essay though we have decided to focus on two very influential readings in the prism of literature. The first one being that by Confucius entitled Analects and the second reading by Machiavelli entitled The Prince. We will be trying to compare the two authors based on different themes and concepts; but before doing that we must acquire a certain level of background about both the two authors and the two readings
Premium Confucius Morality Virtue
AVOIDING CROSS-CULTURAL MISCOMMUNICATION Abstract International business has been developing fast in the globalization. We can see Chinese businessmen in most of places in the world‚ from Africa to America‚ and many 2 foreign companies are investing in China‚ vise versa. I‚ a Vietnamese woman‚ am working for Korea National Oil Corporation (KNOC) in oil and gas field in Vietnam where lots of foreign oil and gas corporations are operating such as KNOC‚ Halliburton‚ Schlumberger‚ BP‚ and Premier.
Premium Culture Cross-cultural communication Communication
I think Plato and Machiavelli are known as two orominent philosphers.Who brought out the creativity in the political life.Both them have many simiilarites in between them.The first similarity in them is that Plato wants only the best should be the head of the etate in his view socartes are the best suitable for that job where as Machiavelli thinks that the prince should be the head of the state because he think mostly price are capaable of doing many things which other people can not.Both Plato
Premium Political philosophy Government Democracy
understanding and knowing virtue and justice‚ and deciding who had the best qualities to lead. In both hands‚ the political community at large and how morals and politics intertwined were the concerns of Plato and Aristotle. Nicolo Mchiavelli‚ Thomas Hobbes‚ and John Lock challenge this assumption to a certain point‚ and familiarize their concerns about good government‚ order‚ and human nature. While many have argued that Machiavelli‚ Hobbes‚ and Locke are clearly distinguished from the ancient thinkers
Premium Political philosophy Plato Aristotle
Cabrera October 6‚ 2013 The Prince and The Discourses and it’s similarities. Reading the books of Machiavelli’s: The Prince and The Discourses I noticed there are many similarities to one another. Machiavelli explains the concept of an ideal ruler that he thinks would be able to govern with great power and adversity from his observation of previous rulers. The Prince is a book written about Tyrants while The Discourses is a book written by lovers of liberty (The Prince‚ Introduction- pg XXIII).
Premium The Prince Florence Republic
environments will act similar. This can be seen through Niccolò Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes; they were both raised in times of chaos and destruction‚ making them believe that an absolute ruler is necessary to maintaining peace. Both philosophers believe that humans are generally self-interested‚ and the natural state of humans is chaos and should be avoided at all costs. People are only prosperous when they are selfish and deceitful. Since Machiavelli and Hobbes both grew up in political turmoil‚ they derived
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes State of nature
Lao-Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli. They’re both on opposite sides of the spectrum for their ideas on how a leader should govern. Lao-Tzu leans more towards a less intrusive government‚ while Machiavelli believes in powerful rulers. Some of their ideas are shown today in our society‚ some good and some bad. Starting with Machiavelli‚ he says “it is not reasonable for an armed man to obey an unarmed man willingly‚ nor that an unarmed man should be safe among armed servants” (Machiavelli 222). To him the
Premium Political philosophy Leadership Thomas Hobbes