Preview

How Should Be a Leader?(According to Machiavelli)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
530 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Should Be a Leader?(According to Machiavelli)
HOW SHOULD BE A LEADER? There are a lot of intellectuals who have books and different thoughts about government and authority. One of them is Machiavelli who is reputed with his book ‘the Prince'. This book includes some advice to leaders. Machiavelli claims in ‘Prince' (chapter XVI, XVII, XVIII) that a prince should be miser than liberal, should prefer being feared rather than being loved, and should not be faithful. In my opinion, a leader shuld not be miser and should prefer being loved than feared and should be faithful; in contrast, a leader should be liberal,faithful, trustworthy and should prefer to be loved rather than to be feared. I think that if a leader is miser,faithless and if he spreads terror, this person can not be a leader of a country or community a long time. This leadership will continue until a rebellision, because the subjects do not like this kind of authority and want to freedom. Therefore, I do not agree with Machiavelli. In chapter XVI Machiavelli claims that a prince should be miser than generous .In my opinion, every community want to have a generous leader. If a leader is miser, then every subject has the same thought.'Our leader spends all income and sources for himself.'This thought can be the reason of losing autority. In chapter XVII he underlines that to be feared than loved is safer, because if people fear you, then its up to you to control their fear by punishment. I disagree with him. I believe that fear is not a solution to have control. If a ledare want to be successful, he should gain the love of his subjects. This love create trust and leadership for a long time. However , if subjects have only the feeling ‘fear' towards their leader, they want to then freedom and then they attempt to find a new leader who is not so awful. In chapter XVIII he says a leader should not keep faith. He also adds a prince should seem humane, religious and upright. The appearance is more important than
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu
    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing Machiavelli And Lao-Tzu's Writings
    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing Machiavelli And Lao-Tzu's Writings

    Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu have very different aspects about how a prince should govern his people. Machiavelli dwells over the fact, whether it is better to be loved or feared. He believes that the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince
    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince Analysis
    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince Analysis

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jackson Vs Machiavelli
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jackson Vs Machiavelli

    Machiavelli "viewed misery as one of the vices that enables a prince to rule" (Machiavelli's Beliefs par.7). He believe it was better to be considered miserly rather than generous, because a generous reputation creates a standard that one must achieve and a greater disappointment if they don't. If the leader is very generous all the time the citizens get used to that and wont appreciate it as much anymore. Therefore, he advises the "princes to avoid the values of justice, mercy, temperance, wisdom and love of their people in preference to the use of cruelty, violence, fear and deception," (par.8). Opposed to how a true leader should be, Machiavelli believes that one must be over aggressive in order to be obeyed. However, Andrew Jackson participated in many generous acts. Especially when he passed the abolishment of tariffs act. Tariffs were a tax on imported goods, placed in order to keep the Norths manufacturing in business, since it was competing with cheaper European products. The South argued that it was unconstitutional, so Jackson reduced the tariffs significantly low. He was always willing to be generous when it came to the common people. I understand how Machiavelli would think a miserly reputation would be easier and better suited for a prince because that makes every good deed more appreciated since its not expected of…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Vs Lao Tzu Research Paper
    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli Vs Lao Tzu Research Paper

    There are many kinds of leaders in this world that believe that their style of leadership is the best. Machiavelli and Lao Tzu were two people that believed that their style of ruling was the best way to rule. They were both extremely outspoken and they stood by their ways. Both Machiavelli and Lao Tzu were very clear about how they thought a government should be run. Even though they both held strong opinions on how a government should be ran, they could not be any more different. If Machiavelli agreed with one topic, most likely, Lao Tzu would be completely against it. Their beliefs are the exact opposite of each other. Machiavelli thought that a ruler should be very strict while Lao Tzu thought that they should be laid back and let the people live their lives the way they wanted too.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli on Government and Those Who Govern
    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli on Government and Those Who Govern

    Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli on Government and Those Who Govern Machiavelli, in “The Prince” and Lao-Tzu in “”Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching” have very opposing views. In their writings, they differ on topics such as qualities of a leader, functions of government, and human nature and the world around them. Here I will describe each of their views and compare the differences. Both Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu are philosophers writing in regard to Government, giving advice in ways that they feel people should be governed. Although they both composed their writings long ago, some of the advice given can still be put to good use in our modern world today. Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu are both very intelligent men, and have very clear perspectives on the topics they write about. On the topic of “Qualities of a leader”, Machiavelli has such strong opinions as to how a ruler should carry himself. He writes about whether it is best to be loved or feared, ultimately coming to a conclusion that a leader must be feared in order to govern his people. In his opinion, a leader who is loved is not doing his job. Machiavelli is almost demanding and has a strong need to control. He advises to be a stern leader, obtaining and maintaining power. He seems very power hungry. He discusses trustworthiness, good and bad reputations, and being knowledgeable in history and military. He believes that a leader needs to be perceived and strong and powerful. Machiavelli takes credit for all good in the government. To Machiavelli it is important to not appear weak to others, especially the people. He does not trust his people, and his role is a dictator. Lao-Tzu’s opinion on the qualities of a leader is very different than that of Machiavelli’s. His idea of a leader is compassionate, modest and moral. He believes that a leader should be loved by his people. It’s important to him to be content and confident, stating, “Because he…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's View On Human Nature Analysis
    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Machiavelli's View On Human Nature Analysis

    The Prince was written by Niccolò Machiavelli while he was in exile. In his efforts to return to politics, Machiavelli wrote the Prince in order to exert the true nature of a successful leader, and once again be in the good graces of the Medici’s who were rising to power in Italy. The Prince reveals what Machiavelli views to be a successful leader. The Prince also reveals how Machiavelli views the nature of humans and how that effects how a dictator/leader should rule. Machiavelli believes human beings are selfish, greedy, easily manipulated, and incapable of self-governing as it often ends in their own demise. “[F]or men change their rulers willingly, hoping to better themselves, and this hope induces them to take up arms against him who rules: wherein they are deceived, because they afterwards find by experience they have gone from bad to worse” (Machiavelli 201). Human selfishness inhibits the individual’s ability to make rational long-term decisions thus deeming them incapable of self-governing. If given the people the right to make their own decisions, their greed ill cloud their judgment and cause them to make decisions that may not be in their best interest. If the society is not capable of self-governing they will need a strong leader and Machiavelli has the recipe for the perfect…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli The Prince Research Paper
    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Machiavelli The Prince Research Paper

    Machiavelli intended The Prince to serve as a guide to creating and holding on to a principality. In it, he also characterizes a "good" society and the necessary tools for building one. Although Machiavelli conceives the republic as being the most practical form of government, he reasons that it is still possible to create a good society under a monarchy, as long as the leader of the monarchy follows the stipulated guidelines. Machiavelli realized that humans are predisposed to act perniciously and therefore it is the responsibility of the prince to exploit that nature in a way that will benefit society as a whole. In this way, Machiavelli's prince is an ideal crafted from the actual, rather than an actual crafted from the ideal.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Prince/Man of All Seasons: Ethics
    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Prince/Man of All Seasons: Ethics

    In his book The Prince, Machiavelli presents a theory asserting that man needs a powerful leader in order to be successful. Machiavelli felt that a Prince must act in a way that guaranteed stability and order. However, his emphasis on political convenience was not in the service of the individual power of a Prince, but in allowing that Prince to do what was necessary for the sake of the people. He argues that as a leader, one has the duty to be dishonest or otherwise deceive its people in times of need. This is further clarified when he addresses the question of whether it is better to be feared or loved.…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Fear In Macbeth
    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role Of Fear In Macbeth

    AAAA It is much better to feared rather than loved. This exactly what is too be learned from Source B. “It is much safer to be feared than loved.” Then the passage goes on to explain how men are more likely to act out against a King who is loved rather than one who is feared. This goes hand in hand with the thesis being a beloved leader can be one to push over while a feared leader is much less likely because obviously, he is feared. Then source A goes on to say…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beowulf: What Makes A Good Leader?
    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Beowulf: What Makes A Good Leader?

    Loyalty is another great thing to look for in a great leader. For instance Beowulf left his own land to go defeat Grendel to protect Hrothgar and his people. After defeating him, Grendels mother came after Hrothgar and his people. Beowulf showed good leadership, he did not leave the land after defeating Grendel. Instead he tracked the new threat which was Grendel's mother. Beowulf and those who accompanied him set out to find his mother. As they found her, and was set to defeat her Beowulf was left to fight alone. Beowulf could have turned around and ran but what good leader would do that?…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    the thing about that one thing that one time
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    the thing about that one thing that one time

    "It is greater to be feared than loved." He advised rulers to instill FEAR in their subjects for the greatest POWER and success.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Love: Leadership and Main Characters Blair
    • 706 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Love: Leadership and Main Characters Blair

    There are many reasons why I disagree with Machiavelli. First of all, it is better to be loved than feared. Sometimes being feared will help someone get what they want, but with fear, feelings of resentment and hate can be found. It will also nurture subversive thoughts of revenge and other malicious intent. Just like in the TV show Gossip Girl, the main characters Blair and Sarina go back and forth seeking revenge over each other because one has more than the other. They are always in a constant battle against each other. Fear must be used in a tightly controlled and insistent fashion or it will fail. To be loved, however, nurtures caring, loyalty, kindness, and other positive binding and giving emotions. It can spawn jealousy in some, but overall it is a much better relationship to have with other people. Fear can cause people to retaliate and eventually disappear. In the article, “Leadership and the Fear Factor”, the authors state “Emotions like love and fear, trust and mistrust, can play a significant role in whether a leader gains followers.” This concludes that typically leaders or anyone in the society gain followers by having trust and love. On a more of personal relationship, I would rather be loved, because to have everyone show fear towards each other, would mean you have no intimate relations with anyone and that is not true living. Franklin P. Jones once said, “Love doesn’t make the world go round. Love is what makes the ride worthwhile.” It is the most powerful feeling to feel loved. I…

    • 706 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics