Ford Pinto Case Ford Pinto Case If we were involved in the Ford Pinto dilemma we would have used Deontological Ethical reasoning to decide whether or not to disclose the danger that the Pinto posed and/or use that reasoning to determine whether or not to install the part(s) that would make the Ford Pinto safer. Our decision would be to do what is morally right and avoid doing what is morally wrong‚ regardless of the consequences. True enough Ford was not obligated by government regulation or
Premium Ford Motor Company Ford Pinto Ethics
meet consumer demand‚ while other brands can do the same. We all can do‚ the characteristics of the brand may also be the same or very similar. Want to get rid of other physical attributes of the brand product should escape the shackles of the level‚Nike Air Force 1 Mid 07 All Black emotional level to shape the brand‚ the emotional level that is unique to create customer value‚ to meet consumers may never think of emotional needs‚ so will your brand with the public different‚ unique and wonderful feeling
Premium
CASE STUDY Q1. What could Nike as a particular Company do to ensure that their associate contract manufacturers‚ all over the world comply with minimum standards of corporate governance in their factories‚ even before they were engaged? Ans1. Nike company should deliver a legal enviironment to the manufacturing factories with which the company is carrying out its contaracts all over the world inorder to support these factories to be able to encourage the ecnomic activity all over the world which
Premium Management Manufacturing
Nike Sweatshops Nike is the largest seller of athletic footwear and apparel in the world. The company is primarily engaged in the design‚ development‚ and worldwide marketing of footwear‚ apparel‚ equipment and accessories. The company operates in the US‚ Europe‚ Asia Pacific‚ the Middle East and Africa. It is headquartered in Beaverton‚ Oregon. (Datamonitor‚ 2006‚ p 4) By shifting manufacturing to developing countries‚ Nike is able to achieve significant cost savings owing to the lower
Premium Corporate social responsibility Sweatshop Social responsibility
head NIKE‚ Inc. Mission‚ Vision‚ Principlesspan classtab/span1br /br / br /br / NIKE‚ Inc. Mission‚ Vision‚ Principles br /br / Ameirah Aldahmanibr /br / MSM631 ndash Strategic Management and Financial Reports Analysis Regis Universitybr /br / Saturday‚ September 04‚ 2010br /br / br /br / Abstractbr /br / span classtab/spanThis paper is a qualitative and quantitative analysis of NIKE‚ Inc.‚ done as six separate sections. The six sections of the project are external environment analysis‚ S
Premium Sustainability
Nike CSR Corporate social responsibility can be defined as the "economic‚ legal‚ ethical‚ and discretionary expectations that society has of organisations at a given point in time" (Carroll and Buchholtz 2003‚ p. 36). The concept of corporate social responsibility means that organizations have moral‚ ethical‚ and philanthropic responsibilities in addition to their responsibilities to earn a fair return for investors and comply with the law. A traditional view of the corporation suggests that its
Premium Corporate social responsibility Social responsibility Business ethics
Business Analysis Part III Nancy Holly MGT/521 Management January 27‚ 2012 Jim O’Keeffe‚ Facilitator Abstract A financial analysis of Ford Motor Company’s (Ford) statements will identify their solvency in today’s automobile market. Elements such as liquidity‚ leverage‚ profitability‚ and activity ratios will demonstrate Ford’s financial health and stability. A further assessment of their technological advantages‚ global strategies‚ and benchmarking analysis will indicate the future
Premium Ford Motor Company General Motors Balance sheet
Company Overviews Nike In 1964 in Oregon‚ Phil Knight and Bill Bowerman join together to make a new enterprise; each contributed about $500 to the partnership. The company started bringing low priced and high tech athletic shoes from Japan to replace the German domination of athletic shoes in the industry. In 1971‚ a graphic design student created the Swoosh trademark for a $35 fee. In the same year Jeff Johnson‚ Blue Ribbon Sports ’ first employee‚ made his most durable contribution to the
Premium Athletic shoe Shoe Footwear
Environmental Analysis…………………………………………………………………...............1 Company Analysis………………………………………………………………………...............4 Decision Options…………….…………………………………………………………………….6 Recommendation………………………………………………………………………………….8 Problem Definition: In early 2007‚ Ford Motor Company is struggling to stay afloat with flat sales and increasing costs in an incredibly competitive market. Over the past five years‚ despite many attempts at restructuring and cutting costs‚ Ford Motors is suffering
Premium Ford Motor Company Automotive industry
Case study: Nike: the Sweatshop Debate 1) Should Nike be held responsible for working condition in factories that it does not own‚ but where sub-contractors make products for Nike? Nike doesn’t own any manufacturing facilities and outsource its production. Therefore‚ it can’t be directly blamed for terrible working conditions. Nike can influence indirectly on working conditions at contracting factories thorough refusing to work with sweatshop factories. However‚ Nike‚ like any other capitalistic
Premium Labor Business ethics