Brand Inventory Report – Nike Footwear MAR6816 – Advanced Marketing Management Summer 2015 2-Year Internet MBA University of Florida Team 8 Members: Jordan Ariche Stephanie Gomillion Lauren Lupo Ken Oliveri NIKE BRAND HERITAGE Nike was founded in 1964 as Blue Ribbon Sports and originally operated as a distributor for the Japanese shoemaker Onitsuka Tiger (known today as Asics). Bill Bowerman‚ a track and field coach‚ and Phil Knight‚ middle-distance runner‚ from University of Oregon‚ created
Premium Nike, Inc. Athletic shoe
DUTA WACANA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY | NIKE‚ Inc. Business Strategy Analysis | Issues in Strategic Information Management | BIS301 | Elia Sagita Wijaya E1000235 | Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 2 II. Background and Assumptions 2 III. Mission Statement‚ Goals and Objectives 2 IV. Remote Environment 3 A. Economic Factors 3 B. Social Factors 3 C. Political and Legal Factors 4 V. Porter’s Five Forces 4 A. Bargaining Power of Suppliers 4 B. Bargaining
Premium Nike, Inc.
Nike World Headquarters 1 Bowerman Drive Beaver‚ OR 97005 Carmina Villegas 14 August 2009 To whom it may concern: A few weeks ago I went over to Westfield Plaza Bonita and purchased brand new black NIKE basketball shoes from Finish Line. The shoes were kept in the box after the purchase for one week‚ and after the first use‚ they began to tear apart. The first time I used them was in a basketball game. After that‚ I was devastated about the results of the shoes because I did not expect
Premium Athletic shoe Nike, Inc. 1916
NIKE Social Responsibilities in Southeast Asia Contents Introduction 1 Thesis 1 Key Topics 2 Topic 1 2 Topic 2 4 Topic 3 6 Conclusion 8 Reference Page 9 Figure 1: From NIKE’s FY1999 through FY2013 their Gross Profit has more than tripled‚ from $3.51B to $11.55B. 2 Figure 2: The original prototype Nike running shoe with the waffle tread pattern. This was the first of many innovations for the company. 3 Figure 3: Nike manufacturing facility in Vietnam. The employees work 10 hrs a day 6 days a
Premium Bill Bowerman Nike, Inc. Social responsibility
Survey‚ Nike and Li Ning (shoes) We Have done an survey and a questionnaire between Nike Shoes and Li Ning Shoes. We have chosen these two brands because they are big competitors in the Chinese market and also worldwide. Nike has been a strong manufacturer in the sport shoes market for a long time and Li Ning is very new in the Sport shoes market‚ still Li Ning has entered strongly in to the market with a high quality‚ high performance and a very competitive price. Our purpose with this survey
Premium Athletic shoe Nike, Inc. No Logo
Nike Goes Green. Very Quietly By Reena Jana Its eco-friendly products save the company money‚ but the brand’s buyers want looks‚ not sustainability. Nike‚ Inc. is the world’s leading supplier of a major manufacturer of sportswear and equipment. It is very famous on the Air Jordan‚ Nike+‚ Nike Pro‚ Nike Golf and Nike skateboarding. Nike goes green Most of the companies are trying to make it supply chain and products greener‚ which bring observable environmental benefit and financial gain
Premium Environment Nike, Inc. Earth
Forces and Government model analysis 8 2.1.3 Turbulence Model 9 2.2 Internal Analysis 9 3. Strategic directions and strategic objectives 10 3.1 Mission 10 3.2 Strategic objective 11 3.2.1 The financial objective of Nike 11 3.2.2 The non-financial objective of Nike 11 4. Key broad business-level and international strategies 12 4.1 Ansoff’s product and market business level strategies 12 4.2 Miles and Snow’s adaptive strategies 13 4.3 Porter’s competitive business level strategies
Premium Strategic management Nike, Inc. Strategic planning
Nike has been able to outperform any competitor and exert a total domination over their industry: the sports footwear and apparel industry. Nike had a return on Capital Investment of 17% in Fiscal year 2005 that ended in May. To make sense of this performance‚ strategy class has taught me to apply these figures within an industry. By applying the 5 force analysis template‚ I have come to a better grasp of Nike’s fortune in the sports footwear and apparel industry in the US market‚ and why it is
Premium Athletic shoe Nike, Inc. Adidas
11). According to Nike code of conduct‚ the organization uses both internal alignment and external competitiveness. This is because it pays minimum wage to its employees or the popular industrial wage. The organization compares the two rates and pays it employees the higher rate. The same applies to Adidas‚ which comes second to Nike in competition. Adidas has to use the same strategies as Nike so as to maintain its employees and attract others (Nike). Nike Inc. uses the flat organization
Premium Employment Management Minimum wage
Reethink‚Reesport‚Reejoy.Always challenge and lead through creativity. | Price Analyzing the prices of Puma and comparing with its competitor prices was discovered‚ that all of them are more or less on the same price levels – medium to high. Although‚ Nike and Adidas products are mostly expensive‚ while Puma is providing products for affordable prices. Today’s Puma is not only sport clothing and equipment‚ but also
Premium Athletic shoe Adidas Reebok