Question 1: a) Explain the main characteristics of a consumer contract. Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SOGA 1979) is amended by Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 and the Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002 The Contract for Sale of Goods A contract for the sale of goods is ‘a contract in which the seller transfers‚ or agrees to transfer‚ the property in goods to a buyer for a money consideration‚ called the price’ This contract contains two conditions‚ Both ‘sale’ and ‘agreement to sell
Premium Contract Tort
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT This Agreement is entered into this 09th of February 2011 by between. New Life Pharmaceuticals Inc. PHILIPPINES‚ a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of the Philippines with office address at the 2667‚ Honduras Street Batangas Cor. Brgy. San Isidro Makati‚ Philippines‚ as represented by its General Manager Sreedhar Nagarajan hereinafter referred to as the “EMPLOYER”; -and- Sandeep Toshkani Indian of legal age‚ currently residing at
Premium Employment
Voidable contract is a contract that has legal effect and force when it is made‚ but is liable to be subsequently annulled or set aside by the courts through the process of recission. Due to the section 10 of the Contracts Act provides‚ all agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of the parties competent to contract. As what i’ve been thought and my understanding‚ there are five causes which lead to the voidable contract. They are : 1. Coercion (S.15) 2. Undue influence (S.16)
Premium Contract Contract law
JUDGMENT V.N. Khare‚ CJI 1. This appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 23-11-2001 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam revolves round the question as to whether an arbitration clause in a contract agreement survives despite purported satisfaction thereof. 2. The parties to this appeal entered into an agreement for a project at Kayamkulam. Upon completion of the work the respondent herein submitted final bill which was allegedly not accepted by the appellant‚ where
Premium Arbitration Contract
Q) What is the original position? What are Rawls two principles of justice? Why does Rawls believe that parties in the original position will chose these principles? During this essay I wish to discuss what is the original position and what its purpose is‚ how the veil of ignorance works and why it’s important for the original position to work. Also‚ what Rawls Two principle of justice are and why Rawls believes that parties in the original position will chose these principles. Created by the American
Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant
Contract Remedies BA265 Business Law II Terrance L. Williams Grantham University December 8‚ 2012 Contract Remedies In our case of National Drilling Company filing suit against Overland Transport‚ Inc. asking compensatory‚ consequential‚ and punitive damages‚ the recovery of National will be based on Quasi Contract. As one reads through the scenario‚ he or she may ask themselves a few questions. What were the exact terms of the contract between National Drilling and Overland Transport
Premium Breach of contract Tort Contract
2.1 Definition of Proposal/Offer Section 2(a) of the Contract Acts 1950 provides that: “when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything‚ with a view to obtain the assent of that other to the act or abstinence‚ he is said to make a proposal”. Eg: Ali advertised in Malay Mails that he will give a reward of RM100 to anyone who finds his pet. He signified his willingness to do an act‚ which is to pay a reward‚ upon certain terms‚ with a view of obtaining
Premium Contract Contract law Hajj
By the case of Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Co the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel was establish and the derivation of modern doctrine of it is to be found in the The doctrine of Promissory Estoppel was first developed but was lost for some time until it was resurrected by Lord Denning in the leading case of Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd. Promissory estoppel There are three exceptions to the rule in Pinnel’s case. They are composite agreement‚ payment of debt
Premium Contract Common law Law
A valid contract consists of all essential components which present and the court will enforce as a legally binding promise . One of the elements contract to create a contract is agreement which included an offer and acceptance. “Acceptance is a final and unqualified assent to the terms of the offer‚ made in the manner specified or indicated by the offeror” . Acceptance may be express orally‚ in writing‚ occasionally‚ or even by implied from the offeree’s conduct. In communication of acceptance‚
Premium Contract Contract law Offer and acceptance
Zidisha Microfinance Member Legal Contract This is a legally binding contract between (Applicant Name) ____________________________________________ of Address ____________________________________________________________________________________ and National Identity Number ___________________________ and Zidisha Inc. (Zidisha)‚ a nonprofit organization located at 21900 Muirfield Circle #302‚ Sterling‚ Virginia 20164 United States. I‚ (Applicant Name) ____________________________________________
Premium Debt Credit Interest