cargo insurance introduction types object insured amount insurance premium liability‚compensation risk coverage exclusions Chapter 3 Carrier’s liability insurance general presentation and provisions carrier liability insurance- CMR- Romania types object insured amount insurance premium liability risk coverage exclusions Chapter 4 Vehicle insurance Car Insurance and the Road Traffic Act Compulsory Car Insurance in
Premium Insurance
Aspects of Contract and Negligence for Business Introduction: A contract between two parties is important for making any agreement. But not any agreement is contract. When there is an enforcement of law in an agreement‚ it converts into contract. There are many formalities to make a contract. Everything is not done when a contract is made. There may exist negligence either one party or both. For the negligence occurred one party‚ liability is imposed on another party. The law of tort differs from
Premium Contract
limit the liability or disadvantage the consumer. The consumer protection regulations (2000) would affect this as it states the amount of days allowed for rejection of goods. It is usually 7 days‚ however o2 have allowed 14 days. • Price variation clauses – this is allows a business or a company to sell goods or services at different prices. An example of this would be petrol‚ as the price changes daily. In my contract this is underlined as number 4 in the quick summary page. Within this contract this
Premium Contract Contractual term
1. Definition of Clause According to Legal dictionary‚ clause is referring to a section‚ phrase‚ paragraph‚ or segment of a legal document‚ such as a contract‚ deed‚ will‚ or constitution‚ that relates to a particular point. A document is usually broken into several numbered components so that specific sections can be easily located. The Supremacy Clause‚ for example‚ is part of Article IV of the U.S. Constitution An exclusion clause is a term in a contract that seeks to restrict the rights of
Premium Contract Contract law
Aragones AP GOV Mr. Odom I. Case Title Kelo v. City of New London‚ 545 U.S. 469 (2005) II. Facts * The State Supreme Court of Connecticut held that the use of eminent domain for economic development did not violate the public use clauses of the state and federal constitutions. * The court also ruled constitutional the government delegation of its eminent domain power to a private entity. * The court held that if an economic project creates new jobs‚ increases tax and other
Premium Estados Unidos Marketing Homo sapiens
In this case‚ although the lot was acquired by Galt and leased to the Beach Club Hotel the lot 18 on block 11 is considered as business premises hence the parking is specifically provided for use of customers and employees. Lindeman’s regular hours of work was from 8 to 5 but he is on call 24/7; in addition‚ Lindeman had an office at his new location
Premium Tax Taxation in the United States Income tax
Moeller** Abstract Acquirers and targets allocate interim risk in merger agreements through Material Adverse Change (MAC) clauses and exclusions. While virtually all acquisitions have MAC clauses‚ there is broad cross-sectional variation in the number and type of MAC exclusions. Using comprehensive hand-collected data‚ we find that acquisitions with fewer firm-specific MAC exclusions‚ i.e.‚ stronger abandonment options for the acquirers‚ are associated with higher acquirer announcement returns‚ higher
Premium Mergers and acquisitions Information asymmetry
INSTITUTE CARGO CLAUSES (A) RISKS COVERED 1. This insurance covers all risks of loss of or damage to the subject-matter insured except as provided in Clauses 4‚ 5‚ 6 and 7 below. Risks Clause 2. This insurance covers general average and salvage charges‚ adjusted or determined according to the contract of affreightment and/or the governing law and practice‚ incurred to avoid or in connection with the avoidance of loss from any cause except those excluded in Clauses 4‚ 5‚ 6 and 7 or
Premium Insurance Marine insurance
to explain what happened to them. This was a consideration which proved persuasive in Levison v Patent Steam Carpet Cleaning Ltd (1978). In this case‚ the defendant carpet cleaners lost the plaintiff’s Chinese carpet in unexplained circumstances. A clause in the contract would have exempted them from liability for negligence‚ but not for any fundamental breach of contract. The burden of proof on the latter issue was held by the Court of Appeal to lie on the defendants. They had to show that they
Premium Pleading Pleading Evidence
the theory or doctrine of fundamental breach. Fundamental breach simply means that if one party fails to perform the fundamental obligation for which the contract is formed‚ he will be guilty of a breach of the contract whether or not any exempting clause has been
Premium Contract Contract law Breach of contract