Congress charter a Bank of the United States‚ to serve as a central bank for the country. Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson opposed the notion‚ on the grounds that the Constitution did not specifically give Congress such a power‚ and that under a limited government‚ Congress had no powers other than those explicitly given to it. Hamilton responded by arguing that Congress had all powers except those specifically denied to it in the Constitution‚ and that moreover‚ the "necessary and proper" clause
Premium United States Constitution Thomas Jefferson United States
To compare the financial performance of Café De Coral Limited and Fairwood Holdings Limited By Cheng Ho Lam Ip Ka Yung Kong Chin To Leung Chi Hung Ng Ho Pong Ngai Yiu Lun Presented to Department of Business Administration Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Kwun Tong) For Higher Diploma in Accountancy (21901F/4B) 2013/2014 Abstract Café de Coral Holdings Limited (Café de Coral) and Fairwood Holdings Limited (Fairwood) are two large catering quick service chains in Hong Kong
Premium Financial ratios Balance sheet Hong Kong
Question 1: Explanation of Matt’s parents right regarding the sales of Goods Act (1979) Under Section 12 (1) in The Sale of Goods Act (1979) the seller has the right to sell the goods when he can pass the good’s title to the buyer (rights of ownership)‚ looking at Rowland v Divall [1923] ALL ER REP 270‚ the court of appeal decided that Divall has breached S.12 of SOGA and that Rowland was entitled to a full refund‚ as he had paid £334 for the right of ownership of the car which he had not received
Premium Contract
Law 494 Part 1 Shlensky v. Wrigley Facts: William Shlensky (plaintiff/appellant)‚ minority stock holder for the Chicago Cubs baseball team sued the team directors who deferred the case to Phillip Wrigley (defendant/appellee) stating mismanagement and negligence because of the refusal of the directors in installing lights at Wrigley Field‚ home field for the Chicago Cubs. Procedural History: Plaintiff original case was lost at trial and plaintiff appealed. Issue: The issue
Premium Corporation Limited liability company
for him – he becomes softer and slightly unsure of himself. When he says the line “You mean- you came because of me?” he would need to look sheepish‚ almost childlike- and show a deep contrast to his previous devious and underhanded self. When performing as Nils Krogstad‚ I would make sure that my costume would reflect his personality‚ and give the audience a feel of what he may be like. He would most likely wear a plain black suit and tie‚ with a white shirt and a long black coat and scarf to highlight
Premium Henrik Ibsen A Doll's House Norway
Suman Siva Prof. Jeong Chun Phuoc 012014111647 Assignment 2 – Weekly Case Law Critique WEEK 2 CASE LAW ON DONOGHUE V STEVENSON (1932) Summary On August 26th 1928‚ Donoghue (plaintiff) and a friend were at a case in Glasgow‚ Scotland. Her friend ordered / purchased a bottle of ginger beer for Donoghue. The bottle was in an opaque bottle (dark glass material) as Donoghue was not aware of the contents. After‚ Donoghue drank some and her friend lifted the bottle to pour the remainder of the ginger
Premium Law Duty of care Tort
METHODS EX- CAPT. HARISH UPPAL v. UNION OF INDIA: Exceptions to the Right to Strike Table of Contents TABLE OF CASES 2 TABLE OF STATUTES 2 Introduction: 3 Research methodology: 4 What is the right to strike and why do we need it? 5 Exceptions: 6 Case review 7 Issues: 7 Analysis: 8 Conclusion 11 Bibliography 13 TABLE OF CASES CASES: 1. Communist Party of India (M) v. Bharat Kumar‚ (1998) 1 SCC 201‚ (Supreme Court of India). 2. Ex- Capt. Harish Uppal v. The Union of India‚ (2003)
Premium Strike action Trade union Human rights
V-Guard Industries Ltd From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation‚ search V-Guard Industries Ltd | Traded as | NSE: VGUARD | Founded | 1977 | Founder(s) | Kochouseph Chittilappilly | Headquarters | Kochi‚ India | Products | Electrical Appliances | Subsidiaries | Wonderla‚ Veegaland | Website | vguard.in | V-Guard Industries Ltd is a major electrical appliances manufacturer in India‚ and the largest in the state of Kerala with an annual turnover of 7 billion.[1][2] It manufactures
Premium Financial ratio Kerala Financial ratios
Does Farmer have any claim(s) for damages against Pilot based on intentional tort? Discuss. Rule of Law : The essential requirements of intentional torts are the elements of intent‚ injury‚ damages and causation. The concept of ’intention’ does not require that Defendant (D) know that his/her act will cause harm to the Plaintiff (P)‚ but must know with substantial certainty that their act will result in certain outcomes (landing of the plane on the P’s land). To successfully make a claim against
Premium Tort law Law Tort
Right To Privacy Under Article 21 and the Related Conflicts A very fascinating development in the Indian Constitutional jurisprudence is the extended dimension given to Article 21 by the Supreme Court in post-Maneka era. The Supreme Court has asserted that Art. 21 is the heart of the Fundamental Rights. Article 21 has proved to be multi-dimensional. The extension in the dimensions of Art.21 has been made possible by giving a extended meaning to the word ‘life’ and ‘liberty’ in Article 21. These
Premium Privacy Human rights Universal Declaration of Human Rights