Character evidence is generally less useful in a civil case than in a criminal case. True Original copies of documents should be carefully preserved for court. Photocopies should be used during interviews and elsewhere in the investigation. True Character evidence might be admissible in a criminal case if entered to prove motive‚ opportunity‚ or ability. True Statements made by the witnesses about what defendants said are hearsay and therefore not admissible. False Which one of the following
Premium Law Criminal law Jury
Supply Chain Management - Nike & Adidas 1. INTRODUCTION Supply management is a complex function that’s critical to business success‚ responsible for delivering efficient costs‚ high quality‚ fast delivery and continuous innovation throughout companies’ entire supply chains. The strategic contribution of supply management is measured not only in savings made‚ but also in increased shareholder value (Niezen‚ Weller & Deringer‚ 2007). Nike and Adidas are two global companies try to improve their
Premium Adidas Supply chain management Management
management is measured not only in savings made‚ but also in increased shareholder value (Niezen‚ Weller & Deringer‚ 2007). Nike and Adidas are two global companies try to improve their competitive advantage through strategically managing and utilizing their supply chain. The purpose of this report is to compare and evaluate the supply chain management practices of Nike & Adidas. 2. CORPORATE PROFILE 2.1 Nike Corporate Profile Based in Beaverton‚ Oregon‚ and employing approximately 29‚000 people worldwide
Premium Supply chain management
Memorandum To: From: Date: 08/31/2012 Re: Laws of Evidence Assignment #2 Statement of Assignment You have asked me to analyze and determine whether the evidence that prosecution would like to introduce at trial can be admitted based on the Federal Rules of Evidence. Pursuant to your request‚ this memo includes my analysis‚ reasoning‚ and conclusions regarding the admissibility of such evidence. Statement of Facts The defendant was prosecuted for the murder of his wife. The victim’s body
Premium Evidence law Critical thinking Murder
Evidence of accomplice: An Introduction Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act‚ 1872 is the only absolute rule of law dealing with accomplice evidence. However it is the opinion of some that this section is redundant as Section 118 makes all persons competent to testify except those persons which the section specifically bars. Moreover there is no rule which requires that the evidence of an accomplice should be corroborated. But Section 133 might lead persons to suppose that the Legislature desired
Premium Evidence law Law
secondary evidence was tendered and admitted. An objection was taken to its admission; Held: That such evidence was properly admitted and that the provision in the relevant statute “that no statement made by any person in answer to any question put by the Commission shall‚ except in cases of indictment for perjury committed in such answers‚ be admissible in evidence in any proceedings‚ civil or criminal” was not applicable‚ and did not prevent the admissibility of such evidence. In the
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Law
Southside High School Facilitator: Henrietta Jones 2.05 Can This Evidence Be Individualized? Evidence 1: A piece of torn clothing was found at a crime scene. A torn t-shirt was found in one of the suspect’s car. 1. Can the torn clothing from the crime scene be individualized to the t-shirt found in the car? Why or why not? Yes. Because it could be individual evidence small glass fragments large glass fragment Evidence 2: Small pieces of glass were found in a suspect’s shirt pocket
Premium Match Piece Newspaper
1. Hearsay evidence rule in Malaysia The general hearsay rule is that a statement made by a person not called as a witness is inadmissible to prove the truth of the facts stated and extends to oral evidence as to statements in documents.1 Where oral evidence is relied on‚ it must be direct in all cases.2 Section 603 has thus codified the rule against hearsay evidence. “Hearsay” does not mean that no witness can be allowed to depose anything which he has heard said by anyone else.4 It is secondary
Premium Evidence law Common law
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI FACULTY OF LAW TAPE RECORDED LECTURES THE LAW OF EVIDENCE LLB II 2003 LAW OF EVIDENCE Lesson 2 RELEVANCE & ADMISSIBILITY RES GESTAE ‘Res Gestae’‚ it has been said‚ is a phrase adopted to provide a respectable legal cloak for a variety of cases to which no formula of precision can be applied’. The words themselves simply mean a transaction. Under the inclusionary common law doctrine of Res Gestae‚ a fact or opinion which is so closely associated in time‚ place
Premium Evidence law Jury
Evidence is the key element in determining the guilt or innocence of those accused of crimes against society in a criminal court of law. Evidence can come in the form of weapons‚ documents‚ pictures‚ tape recordings and DNA. According to the American Heritage College dictionary‚ evidence is the documentary or oral statements and the material objects admissible as testimony in a court of law (476). It is shown in court as an item of proof‚ to impeach or rehabilitate a witness‚ and to determine a sentence
Premium Murder O. J. Simpson murder case Nicole Brown Simpson