Implement person centred approaches in health and social care 1.1 Define person-centred values. 1.2 Explain why it is important to work in away that embeds person centred values. The underlying purpose of “Person-centred values” is to ensure that the individual needing care is placed at the very centre of the decision making process about their life‚ the services and support they want and need. Therefore‚ under this strict system‚ the person is always placed at the very centre of the planning
Premium Decision making Person Individual
loss to the plaintiff while the damages are foreseeable‚ the defendant will be liable to negligence. The following shows why ABC ltd is negligent and therefore liable to Johnny and Kenneth. Negligence is behavior that falls below the standard of reasonable‚ prudent and competent people. The careless behavior alone of the waiter would not incur liability to ABC ltd. Only when it leads to the damage by negligence‚ which is actionable‚ would incur liability. In Donoghue v Stevenson‚ friends of Mrs. Donoghue
Premium Tort Duty of care Tort law
against TAFE for his injury from the accident‚ he had rights to claim for his cost from TAFE that he did not fix the engine on the wrong way. There are five steps about the law of negligence‚ first is duty of care‚ it is a legal duty owed by one person to another‚ in this case‚ TAFE owed a duty of care to John. Because based on foreseeable test‚ John is a student who graduated form the TAFE‚ he also proved that the instructor of TAFE gives him a wrong instructions about how to fix an engine‚ then
Premium Tort Negligence Duty of care
the following conditions must be satisfied:- 1. Accident‚ an exceptional occurrence The accident which caused the plaintiff’s injury must be such as would not ordinarily happen but for the want of care on the part of somebody. Thus‚ where a person is injured because of the collapsed of the ceiling‚ it is clear that such things could not ordinarily happen unless somebody had been negligent. Examples:- A crane collapsed in a construction site. Swan v Salisbury Contructions [1966]‚
Premium Tort law Tort Duty of care
Things to consider person centred to the individual Things I would like to learn For example writing‚ cooking‚ swimming learning about a chosen subject. Work‚ training‚ day time activities What I would like to do during the day; would I like to go to college if so what course would I be interested in doing‚ interests‚ voluntary work‚ community activities. Having fun Holidays‚ places to go‚ leisure‚ hobbies‚ interests and how would I get there. Communication How should people communicate
Premium Psychology Recreation Leisure
Torts Notes – Negligence Contents 1 Preamble 2 1.1 Concurrent Wrongdoers 2 1.2 Death 2 1.3 Apologists 2 1.4 Vicarious liability/non-delegable duties 3 2 Duty of care 5 2.1 Immunities 5 2.2 Omissions/failure to control third party 6 2.3 Atypical Plaintiffs 6 2.4 Unborn Child 6 2.5 Mental Harm/Nervous Shock 7 2.6 Statutory Authorities 8 2.7 Pure Economic Loss/Negligent Misstatement 11 3 Breach of Duty 12 3.1 Section 5C 12 3.2 Obvious risks 12 4 Causation 13 4.1 Res ipsa loquitur
Premium Tort law Tort Negligence
Promenade’s management breached the standard of care. It was reasonably foreseeable that certain visitors would slip due to the slippery floor. Moreover‚ as Charles‚ the tour leader‚ told Elsie to be careful of slipping‚ it was clear that a reasonable person should have noticed the danger of the slippery floor. However‚ the arcade’s management didn’t do any things to prevent visitors from slipping. They could have organized cleaners to clean the wet floor and put a notice board or a sign to remind
Premium Duty of care Reasonable person Tort
Assignment 1 SHC 34 1.1‚1.2 Definition of “Duty of Care” Duty of care is a legal term and this is a definition from a legal dictionary. Duty of care n: A requirement‚ that a person act toward others and the public with watchfulness‚ attention‚ caution and prudence that a reasonable person in the circumstances would. If a person’s actions do not meet this standard of care‚ then the acts are considered negligent‚ and any damages resulting may be claimed in a lawsuit for negligence
Premium Tort Standard of care Reasonable person
patio. In consequence the appellant required surgery and prevented her from returning to work for six months. In the appeal hearing the appellant argued that the primary judge wrongly estimate that a dog sitting in the house was insignificant for a person who terrified of the dog‚ thus he
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
and occupier’s liability‚ economic loss and psychiatric loss. Negligence is when somebody has a duty of care and that duty is breached. Negligence is split into 3 parts. Duty of Care In certain situations‚ a duty of care is owed to another person. For example‚ a surgeon owes a duty of care to whoever they operate on. The existence of a duty of care is established by the Neighbour Test which was brought in by Lord Aitken after the Donoghue v Stevenson case; In the Donoghue v Stevenson case
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence