1. What is the total value of RJR Nabisco under (a) the pre-bid operating strategy? (b) the Management Group’s operating strategy? (c) KKR’s operating strategy? Approach We used the APV approach to value the company under each of the three scenarios. To do so‚ we needed to find the free cash flow‚ debt tax shield‚ and the discount rate‚ which is ra. This rate should be applicable across all three scenarios‚ because it is not dependent on the operations of the company. We then needed to value
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Depreciation Fundamental analysis
Harvard Business School 9-290-021 Rev. August 7‚ 1995 RJR Nabisco - 1990 In the spring of 1990‚ the firm of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) was in negotiation with lenders regarding the refinancing of a $1.2 billion bridge loan due to be repaid in full by February‚ 1991. The bridge loan was part of the $24 billion financing of KKR’s leveraged buyout of RJR Nabisco in early 1989. Originally‚ KKR had planned to retire the loan with the proceeds of a $1.25 billion public offering of
Premium Debt Leveraged buyout Balance sheet
Case Study: RJR Nabisco By July 20‚ 2013 One of the most famous leveraged buyouts (LBOs) that have has been studied is the RJR Nabisco LBO. There was also a movie made about this LBO entitled Barbarians at the Gate‚ which you may be interested in watching. Review this case study in Chapter 7 of your text and conduct your own research. In a 3–4-page case study‚ address the following: 1. Discuss the background of the case. Who were the players? What prompted this leveraged buyout (LBO)
Premium Leveraged buyout
9 billion acquisition of Nabisco Brands Inc. To finance the acquisition‚ RJR was proposing the issue of $1.2 billion of 12 year notes and the same amount in preferred stock. It had already funded $1.5 billion of the acquisition leaving $1 billion more to finance. Challenges facing RJR: Of the $1.5 billion that had been funded‚ $500 million came from cash and the remaining was through bank borrowings and commercial paper. These borrowings added to the debt that RJR had issued in 1984 and brought
Premium Finance Forward contract Bond
firms to acquire RJR Nabisco. Finally‚ the private equity takeover firm‚ Kohlberg Kravis and Roberts & Co (commonly referred to as KKR) was responsible for the 1988 leveraged buyout of RJR Nabisco. This was documented in several articles in The Wall Street Journal by Bryan Burrough and John Helyar. These articles were later used as the basis of a bestselling book‚ Barbarians at the Gate: The Fall of RJR Nabisco‚ and then into a made-for-TV film. As a result‚ in February 1989‚ RJR Nabisco paid executive
Premium Leveraged buyout Corporation
Sears Holdings Corporation is a company that came from two very well known organizations‚ Sears and Kmart. Both companies go back even farther than the 1900s and unfortunately both companies experienced financial difficulty at one point. With the merger Sears Holdings Corporation has the experience of both organizations as well as their different style of operating. Along with an improved customer base and a new outlook Sears Holdings Corporation is experiencing financial growth. Richard W. Sears
Premium Sears Holdings Corporation Kmart Sears
Business Summary • Background XFY Holding Corporation (Code: 0968) is a hot pot restaurant management company that offer a healthy‚ delicious and enjoyable hot pot concept. LSXFY Ontario Inc. is the exclusive distributor for Little Sheep Mongolian Hot Pot in Canada. In 2005 Little Sheep Hot pot firstly was opened in Toronto‚ Canada. By right of special soup base and a new hot pot concept of without dipping the sauce‚ Little Sheep Hot Pot quickly was accepted by our customers. Then Little
Premium Penang Malaysia Petroleum
Executive Summary The case‚ Marriott Corporation: The Cost of Capital (Abridged)‚ concentrates on making decisions based on capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) to measure the opportunity cost for investments. Dan Cohrs‚ the Vice President of Finance of Marriott Corporation‚ had to deal with making recommendations for the hurdle rates at Marriott Corporation and its three divisions which are lodging‚ restaurant and contract services. In calculating
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Finance
1. What is the weighted average cost of capital for Marriot Corporation? Briefly outline the key assumptions that you made in computing the WACC. 2. What is the cost of capital for the lodging and restaurant divisions of Marriot Corporation? Briefly outline the key assumptions that you made in computing the cost of capital and outline any limitations that are presented by your analysis. 3. If Marriot uses a single company-wide cost of capital for evaluating investment opportunities in each of its
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Interest Rate of return
Case #3 “Marriott Corporation” The Cost of Capital” What is the weighted average cost of capital for the Marriott Corporation and cost of capital for each of its divisions? – What risk-free rate and risk premium did you use to calculate the cost of equity? – How did you measure the cost of debt? – How did you measure the beta for each division? Solution What risk-free rate and risk premium did you use to calculate the cost of equity? – Risk-free rate proxy The risk-free
Premium Arithmetic mean Weighted average cost of capital Average