11/25/13 SAMSUNG ELECT LTD(F) (SSNLF): Samsung’s New Strategy Is A Worry For Apple - Seeking Alpha Samsung’s New Strategy Is A Worry For Apple Nov 25 2013‚ 00:07 by: Vivek Gupta ‚ Samsung (OTC:SSNLF) and Apple (AAPL) are two leading players of the smartphone industry (see the table below). Apple is the most profitable‚ while Samsung is the largest player (by revenue as well as volumes) in the industry. Samsung is not only the largest but also is the most competitive player in the industry
Premium Mobile operating system Smartphone Mobile phone
INTRODUCTION For Samsung Electronics‚ 2003 was a watershed year. It successfully positioned itself as one of the world’s best mobile phone manufacturers and its products were featured all over the media. Many were calling its mobile phones as “the best gift for Christmas or the Mercedes of mobile phones. Samsung’s achievements were particularly remarkable
Premium Mobile phone
Samsung Galaxy S2 Samsung galaxy S2 is the latest Android smartphone that was announced by Samsung on 13 February 2011 at the Mobile World Congress and is currently the world’s thinnest smartphone. The Galaxy S II is the development of the previous Samsung Galaxy S. It features are: * 1.2 GHz dual-core SoC processor‚ in either Samsung’s own. * It has 1 GB of RAM‚ a 10.9-centimetre (4.3 in) WVGA Super AMOLED plus display * 8 megapixel camera with flash that can record videos in full
Premium Mobile phone Smartphone
APPLE INC. VS SAMSUNG In Australia‚ the electronic industry is dominated by oligopoly. The two companies from the electronic industry‚ Apple Inc. and Samsung‚ control more than 46% of the market share just from smartphones which gives them dominance that has led to increased difficulties for other firms to enter the market‚ decreased prices for consumers and higher profits. The competition between these two industries also has caused uproars in employment issues‚ court cases and copyright controversies
Premium Mobile phone Smartphone Apple Inc.
decreased. Also‚ Samsung has the multiple products to sustain itself and high brand value. Besides‚ Samsung has its own advantages: Lower-cost structure: located main R&D facility and fabs at a single site High investment in R&D to maintain technology lead Multiple product segments(LCD‚ Mobile Phones) Financial stability Created high brand value 3. How much of Samsung’s performance is based on its reputed low-cost advantage? According to Exhibit 7a‚ In 2003 Samsung enjoyed a cost advantage
Premium Mobile phone China Brand
Microsoft and Nokia. This ‘transformation’‚ turning Microsoft into a ‘devices and services’ company‚ is key to the company’s continuing survival‚ and would be impossible without Nokia. Here are four reasons why the acquisition had to happen: Microsoft need to keep its momentum Recent industry figures have shown Microsoft’s Windows Phone 8 posting its highest ever market share allowing the mobile OS to leapfrog BlackBerry and become the third-most popular globally. This means that Windows Phone
Premium Smartphone Windows Mobile Microsoft
Marketing Plan For Samsung Electronics Kent State University East Liverpool BMRT 21050-300 Joseph Gillis Spring 2013 Table of Contents l. Executive Summary ll. Environmental Analysis A. Marketing Environment B. Target Market C. Current Marketing Objectives and Performance lll. SWOT Analysis A. Strengths B. Weaknesses C. Opportunities D. Threats lV. Marketing Objectives V. Marketing Strategies A. Target Market B. Marketing
Premium Marketing
8 9.0 Conclusion…………………………..................................................................8 10.0 References…………………………..................................................................9 Executive Summary This report will discuss whether Samsung Group can establish a company in Malaysia. The report will be divided into two parts: external environment and SWOT analysis of the external
Premium South Korea Korea Samsung Electronics
superiority of Samsung over its competitors exceeded 51 per cent! The cost advantages related to raw materials may be explained by better negotiated agreements with suppliers (perhaps due to the larger volumes of purchases – comp. Fig. 5) and possibly less shipping and distribution costs that stem from the fact that Samsung’s fab facilities are geographically collocated (while competitors’ facilities are spread world-wide). In terms of labour productivity only Chinese SMIC outperformed Samsung‚ but that
Premium Cost Costs China
the five forces; threat of new entrants‚ bargaining power of buyers‚ threat of substitute products or services‚ bargaining power of suppliers and rivalry among existing competitors (Porter‚ 2008). “Industry structure‚ manifested in the competitive forces‚ sets industry profitability in the medium and long run.” (Porter‚ 2008). 1) How well does the experience curve (Kiechel) and Porter’s Five Forces satisfy the ‘strategist’ perspective? The experience curve represents a tool for strategists
Premium Strategic management Management