Facts: The Arizona Train Limit Law of 1912 prohibited trains that could carry fourteen passengers or had more than seventy freight cars as a safety measure. Then Southern Pacific Company said that this law violated the Commerce Clause. Statute: Arizona Train Limit Law Constitutional Provision: Commerce Clause Legal Question: Does the Arizona Train Limit Law violate the Commerce Clause? Legal Reasoning (J. Stone): • States don’t have the authority to substantially inhibit the flow of commerce
Premium United States Constitution United States Congress United States
Miranda V. Arizona‚ 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Miranda V. Arizona is case where Mr. Ernesto Miranda who was suspected for kidnapping and rape of 18 years old woman. After Mr. Miranda is arrested and identified by victim‚ police interrogated him for two hours and he confessed the crime. However at time he signed a confession he was not aware of his rights. No one told him his rights to remain silent nor informed him that his statement would be used against him. Although‚ when he put his confession into
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Ernesto Miranda was a poor Mexican immigrant living in Phoenix‚ Arizona‚ during the 1960’s. Miranda was arrested after a crime victim identified him in a police lineup. He was charged with rape and kidnapping and was interrogated for two hours while in police custody. The police officers questioning him did not inform him of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination‚ or of his Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of an attorney. As a result of the interrogation‚ he confessed in writing
Premium
traditions‚ while Thomas our second main character is a deeply rooted traditional storyteller. In the beginning of the story Victor‚ our Native American narrator learns the death of his father. Jobless and penniless‚ his only wish is to go to Phoenix‚ Arizona and bring back his father’s ashes and belongings to the reservation in Spokane. The death of Victor’s father leads him and Thomas to a journey filled with childhood stories and memories that will make them reconsider the state of their friendship
Premium Native Americans in the United States Arizona Friendship
management group‚ group 7‚ was assigned to take over a business as top level management. With the only guideline of creating a drastically more capable and profitable organization within a year‚ we had a lot of work ahead. The business belonged to Old Joe‚ an absolute genius engineer who was lacking in business management skills‚ Fred‚ a failed engineer with underlying personal issues resulting in counterproductive activity‚ and Netty‚ Old Joe’s wife. This division of the business specializes in the
Premium Management Total quality management Cycle count
Arizona v. Rodney Joseph Gant 1. Heading a. Arizona v. R. Joseph Gant‚ Supreme Court of the United States‚ 2009 (April 21‚ 2009) 2. Statement of Facts a. Tucson‚ Arizona police officers acted on an anonymous tip that the residence at 2524 N. Walnut Ave was being used to sell drugs. The door was answered by Rodney Gant‚ who after a records check‚ revealed that Gant’s driver’s license had been suspended and there was an outstanding warrant out for his arrest for driving with a suspended license
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
On June 13th‚ 1966‚ the Supreme Court announced its 5-4 ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case. This ruling established “Miranda Rights‚” a standard police procedure which revolves around the principle that an arresting officer must advise a criminal suspect of his or her rights before being taken into custody and interrogated. The Court’s ruling in this landmark case effectively reinforced the importance of ensuring that the accused are aware of their Fifth Amendment rights. The Fifth Amendment guarantees
Premium Crime Police Miranda v. Arizona
Protective Orders in Arizona Protective Orders in Arizona Suzi Austin CJHS/430 Protective Orders in Arizona In the state of Arizona there are four types of protective orders ("Law.arizona.edu"‚ n.d.). An emergency order can be requested when the life or health of a person is determined to by in immediate danger. The statute that governs this order is A.R.S. § 13-3624(C). It can be requested by a law enforcement officer and it is not required that the plaintiff be present. This type of
Premium Law Human rights Federal Emergency Management Agency
Chapter 11 - The Arizona Driver License Driving is a Privilege‚ Not a Right! Driving is a privilege‚ granted and revocable by the State at any time. Driving is a privilege‚ granted and revocable by the State at any time. It is a common misconception that driving in the State of Arizona is your "right‚" but in reality‚ it is a privilege to drive in this state because you must meet prescribed criteria to be licensed. The Motor Vehicle Division has been empowered by the state to oversee all licensing
Premium United States Automobile Law
The legal issue presented in Arizona v. United States is whether federal immigration laws preclude Arizona’s cooperative law enforcement efforts and implicitly preempt provisions of Arizona’s immigration law (S.B. 1070). My team and I believe that S.B. 1070 violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution‚ which makes federal law the “supreme law of the land.” As such‚ S.B. 1070 unconstitutionally intrudes on the federal government’s authority to regulate immigration law and should therefore
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution