process and how we differentiate between what is good or bad‚ and contemplating cause and effect. Machiavelli‚ Locke‚ and Marx all have different conceptions of human nature‚ which has led to a variation of conclusions regarding the political structures of society. Some of their ideas still have resonance today‚ which goes to show how much of an impact their theories have in regard to human nature. Machiavelli is a Christian‚ and his religion shaped a lot of his opinions on civilization. He believes that
Premium Christianity Jesus Political philosophy
The most effective points Marino emphasizes is the distinctions being made in the article. Those distinctions are clarifying everything that Marino is stating about the quotes used and to back up the thesis. The distinctions are the clarification of all of Marino’s points that illustrate the thesis. He describes how the thesis or any points regarding the thesis are how he expects it to be. Marino clarifies his quotes as he adds and explains what his point of view is towards the main topic
Premium Ethics Love Happiness
In Plato’s dialogue‚ Meno‚ Socrates is asked a paradoxical question about what virtue is by Meno. “How will you enquire‚ Socrates‚ into that which you do not know? What will you put forth as the subject of enquiry? And if you find what you want‚ how will you ever know that this is the thing which you did not know?” Socrates retorts that if you already know what you are searching for‚ then you do not have to search. Alternatively‚ if you do not know what you are looking for‚ the search is indeed
Premium
enable it to exercise power to ensure peace and justice that are the objective of this contract social and defend the weakest from the domination of the strongest. From this mode justifies the birth of government the great Leviathan. On the contrary‚ Socrates provides different values such as virtue and introspective analysis as the main philosophical guide to run a government. Hobbes seeks to show that a community as such is a
Premium Political philosophy Plato Social contract
on trial we are judged by a jury of our own peers‚ a right an attorney‚ and that we are innocent until proven guilty. When Socrates was put on trial he was given none of these‚ to be fair he decided not to have a lawyer. Socrates was charged for not believing in the gods that the state believed in and corrupting the youth‚ brought to the court by Meletus and others. Socrates’ starts his defense by stating that all he will do is speak the truth and not waste time telling stories. “So they‚ as I say
Premium Plato Socrates Philosophy
and a few famous battles are referenced within the book’s many chapters. Although it is unclear whether the book was to be taken seriously or it is a work of satire is unclear‚ the excessive and flowery praise of Loronzo De’Medici‚ whose family Machiavelli fought against on more than one occasion‚ leads the reader to the latter mind set. Although there are many historians who believe that The Prince is a “job application of sorts”1 meant to endear himself to the powerful family. “And although I deem
Premium Florence Political philosophy
be sure many men like Socrates made every effort to discover the origin of humans morality‚ even questioning a fellow Athenian Euthyphro. Paying with his life‚ Socrates embarked on a mission to question beliefs‚ and during this time he question Euthyphro about his expertise with "piety" and "impiety." As Euthyphro claimed his morality was something he gained from the god’s definition of piety‚ and was prosecuting his father for accidentally murdering a servant‚ but Socrates argues that even the
Premium
The Prince was written by Niccolo Machiavelli for Lorenzo de Medici so that Machiavelli could get back in his good graces. After his many years in politics‚ he wrote this to explain what would make a prince virtuous and how to rule properly. The book shows the background of politics and to some people it can be seen as immoral. There are two types of principalities: a hereditary prince or a new prince. Machiavelli focuses more on the new princes and uses other princes as references to what should
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence
Reading the works of Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu in succession highlight how truly at opposition the messages are. Though both pieces express the desired way to govern a people‚ the “Tao-te Ching” speaks of peace‚ simplicity‚ and letting the universe work its will‚ while “The Qualities of the Prince” emphasizes the necessity for war‚ and the natural wickedness of men. There are no particular reasons that these two ways of thought should be in harmony‚ one written in the 6th century‚ and the other the
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Ethics
Machiavelli’s views of the citizen-warrior as misogynistic? – Feminists see Machiavelli’s views of a warrior as misogynistic because he believes that for human excellence to be achieved‚ they must constantly strive for power. Tickner states that Machiavelli brought back the ideology of a citizen-warrior in Europe during the sixteenth century. Moving forward‚ Morgenthau reimbursed the idea of a citizen-warrior in the 20th century. This goes to show that throughout history‚ war‚ and warriors‚ are all
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Cesare Borgia