Socrates though that philosophers would make the most ideal ruler in the ideal city. However‚ Adeimantus thought the opposite of Socrates saying that philosophers would make the worst rulers of the ideal city. Adeimantus thought that philosophers who were ignorant in the ways of philosophy‚ such as individuals pretending to be philosophers‚ would lead the ideal city into destruction. Also‚ he thought that the best philosophers‚ like Socrates‚ would only be caught up in philosophy and not the politics
Premium Plato Philosophy Political philosophy
angry with Socrates may have been from a specific sentiment family relationship. In the event that Socrates was as he has been depicted‚ then he would have been an extremely shrewd individual‚ and prevalent regardless of being a dissident. These are qualities I think Nietzsche would have preferred. In any case‚ the bearing Socrates took these things were so in opposition to Nietzsche’s own perspectives‚ that perhaps it might be said it resembled being deceived by a companion. Take Socrates’ demise
Premium Plato Philosophy Aristotle
Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends‚ Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments‚ which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic‚ it will not accept the characteristic that
Premium Socrates Plato Soul
and they are very learned people. Among the most revered philosophers of all time was Socrates. Living around the 5th century B.C.‚ Socrates was among the first philosophers who wasn’t a sophist‚ meaning that he never felt that he was wise for he was always in the pursuit of knowledge. Unfortunately‚ Socrates was put to death late in his life. One of his best students‚ Plato‚
Premium Philosophy Plato Socrates
Socrates‚ in his conviction from the Athenian jury‚ was both innocent and guilty as charged. In Plato’s Five Dialogues‚ accounts of events ranging from just prior to Socrates’ entry into the courthouse up until his mouthful of hemlock‚ both points are represented. Socrates’ in dealing with moral law was not guilty of the crimes he was accused of by Meletus. Socrates was only guilty as charged because his peers had concluded him as such. The laws didn’t find Socrates guilty; Socrates was guilty
Premium Plato Socrates Philosophy
Should fearing death be irrational? Socrates‚ the Greek philosopher‚ offers explanations in the apology as to why we shouldn’t fear death. No one has the ability to explain or warn us of how it feels to die. At this time anyone could accuse you and the majority of votes decided whether you would live or die. Socrates later in the trial was convicted guilty and he had to take a hemlock based liquid. This hemlock based liquid caused him to feel his body numb which slowly killed him. The liquid harmed
Premium Life Plato Reincarnation
What did Socrates mean by ‘the examined life’ In the Apology Socrates opined that the greatest good a man could engage in‚ is continual discussion about virtue and examination of its presence in self and others. Socrates felt that Athenians‚ like a purebred horse that is well fed but seldom exercised‚ had become lazy‚ sluggish and underperforming. He was disturbed by the indulgence which coupled with fixation on wealth was distracting his townsmen from true greatness that would only be achieved
Premium Plato Virtue Euthyphro
Socrates: The Dichotomy between Aristophanes and Plato’s Depictions Ignorance: the condition of being uninformed or uneducated; this basic definition is crucial to understanding one of the most controversial figures in ancient Athenian society: the philosopher Socrates. The man’s entire life was devoted to proving the fact that no one actually knew what they thought they did; that everyone lived in ignorance. This viewpoint earned Socrates many enemies‚ so many that even a renowned playwright
Premium Socrates Plato Apology
#1 Book IV 435d-445e seems to be Socrates’ argument about the three parts of the human soul and how the human soul with its three parts are parallel to the republic and the three different kinds of citizens. What I am interested in is the methods that Socrates implements to come to his conclusions. More specifically‚ I would like to talk about Socrates’ analogies that he uses to come to his conclusions. Very interesting‚ to say the least‚ analogies that Socrates uses is physical actions to explain
Premium Socrates Plato Soul
collections. In this book‚ Socrates‚ Meno‚ a slave boy and Anytus are four main roles. In this specific theme‚ the argument starts from the question asked by Meno‚ “What’s the virtue and whether it is something teachable?” Socrates states that he doesn’t know what exactly virtue is‚ but it must be something good defined as a common essence for human being; it is also defined different to different people‚ but it must be able to satisfy one’s desire. Then Meno presents Socrates his paradox. Basically
Premium Plato Philosophy Socrates