After reading Aquinas’s “The Five Ways” I found that his second way‚ the argument of causation‚ is the most fitting to Descartes belief about the existence of god. In my opinion‚ this argument holds the most truth because it supports what Descartes speaks upon in is third meditation. Descartes states that he himself could not have invented the idea of god. He then raises the question of what within himself allows him to believe that there is a god. Descartes cannot recall when the idea of a god first
Premium
May 7th‚ 2007 Accounting for Evil: When attempting to prove God’s existence one must account for aspects of the world that appear to be contrary to our understanding of divine presence. One question in particular that deserves attention is the existence of evil throughout the world around us. If‚ in fact‚ a Christian God does exist‚ he/she would then presumably be all good‚ all-knowing‚ and all-powerful‚ and therefore would use his/her powers to stop evil from being a part of our world all
Premium Theodicy Metaphysics Ontology
of the Summa Contra Gentiles‚ Saint Thomas argues that human beings can know about God by utilizing both faith and reason. When explaining the power of reason Aquinas says‚ “The principle of knowledge that reason perceives about something is the understanding of the very substance of that being.”
Premium Meaning of life Religion Human
An argument against Thomas Aquinas’ fifth way Section One (Introduction): In this paper I will be arguing against Thomas Aquinas’ fifth way‚ a teleological argument supporting the existence of God. Aquinas’ philosophical argument rests primarily on a claim about the explanation for processes‚ their origins‚ and ends. I will try to combat his conclusion that there must be an intelligent being that designed and guides all things to their ends. This will be done through referencing the science of
Premium Metaphysics Aristotle Thomas Aquinas
Diego Luna Philosophy 192 Dr. Gallo 22 May‚ 2015 The Problem of Evil The problem of evil may be described as a theory or conclusion that there is no God of the universe. Although the teleological argument can prove the existence of any God‚ the problem of evil simply states that if there was a God who was a “Perfect Being” then there should be no evil in the universe. According to the power point of the problem of evil‚ it says if God was a “Perfect Being‚” that means he would be omniscient‚ omnipotent
Premium Theodicy Universe Problem of evil
Four components of Thomas Aquinas’ cosmological argument for the existence of God are the argument from first motion‚ the argument from first cause‚ the argument from degrees‚ and the argument from the contingent. The argument from first motion is practically the thought that because things move in the universe and something else caused those things to move‚ then there must be an initial mover—that initial mover is God (Vaughn 64-65). Aquinas’ second argument is that from first-cause‚ this is basically
Premium Metaphysics Cosmological argument Existence
Aquina’s five objections and responses have practically the same structure. The difference lies in the fact that in the last two ways‚ that of Aquinas‚ does not mention the impossibility of infinitely infinite series‚ although they are assumed. Certain authors belonging to the Modern Age (epistemological paradigm) have questioned the conclusion about the existence of God undermining the premises of the five Thomistic demonstrations. You have seen how Hume’s critique of the idea of causality renders
Premium Metaphysics Aristotle Existence
Critically expose the problem of evil. Evil is a privation of the good. The problem of evil “arises from the paradox of an omnibenevolent‚ omnipotent deity’s allowing the existence of evil” (Pojman 1987: 151). The Judeo-Christian tradition affirmed that God is omnipotent‚ omniscient and perfectly good. The same tradition also affirmed the existence of evil. The presence of evil‚ this privation of the good‚ is taken to be one of the arguments against the existence of God. The presence of evil has presented
Premium God Omnipotence Evil
analyze the Problem of Evil from Mackie’s standpoint using his objective techniques. In this essay‚ I will choose to elaborate on the Problem of Evil. Furthermore‚ I will explain why I agree with the argument‚ by presenting the two strongest objections based on what seems to be a more persuasive argument‚ then show why those objections do not succeed. The two objections that I select to present are (1) “Good cannot exist without evil” or “Evil is necessary as a counterpart to good” and (2) “Evil is due
Premium Problem of evil Free will Evil
In all of these‚ God is the central truth. Aquinas believes that law was given to us by God’s divine existence‚ and as such is the eternal law. According to Aquinas‚ because God is inherently good‚ any laws and their subsequent punishments that are based on eternal law are considered virtuous and good as they are a means to make man moral and true. Laws
Premium Thomas Aquinas Virtue Natural law