In the reading of Jane English‚ English argues that" grown children have no filial obligations towards their parents." In her professional philosophical theory‚ she agrees‚ "that whatever duties children are willing to perform for their parents should not be one that is established out of repayment but from the result of a friendship that molded from the love between them." I do agree with English’s theory based on my cultural norms which foresees it as a form of accepted behavior and beliefs that
Premium Family Parent Mother
of Law Interpretation of CISG- Objective and subjective test • Formation of a contract; offer‚ acceptance‚ withdrawal‚ acceptance with modification. Overview • Buyer’s and seller’s obligations • Buyer’s and seller’s remedies GENERAL STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE • Both buyer and seller have to perform their obligations under the contract. • A party that fails to perform is in breach. • The party that does not breach has remedies. Fundamental Breach • When one party breaches‚ the other party may avoid
Premium Contract law Contract Breach of contract
civil law should be treated as a moral obligation‚ by proving that to ignore the rule of law would be to commit moral wrong. He then qualifies this by illustrating that lawfulness is not always equal to virtuousness‚ and explaining how to remain virtuous without damaging the authority of the law. Further examination of his arguments in regards to civil disobedience reveal inconsistency and the necessity for further development. SOCRATES’ MORAL OBLIGATION TO CIVIL LAW In the Crito‚ Socrates
Premium
Title How is one to determine one’s moral obligation? What is one ought to do in a given situation and how exactly should we go about calculating and determining which actions we should do? The first principle that we will examine is the Simple Principle‚ which is a principle that says‚ of the available actions‚ one should do the action that will produce the best outcome. Liam B. Murphy in “The Demands of Beneficence” argue that the Simple Principle‚ requires too much from a person especially
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
National Obligations If someone is hurt and there are others nearby who could be of some help‚ generally they are obligated to do so. Generally‚ at no cost to themselves‚ they can help someone else whenever the need arises. However‚ there are sometimes circumstances in which the helper must do more than just care enough to help. Sometimes‚ they will need to commit more time and effort than it could be worth. Sometimes‚ helping someone else could cost them dearly. In even worse case‚ helping could
Premium English-language films Law Psychology
slurs about the homeless’ way of living‚ the young lady is confused as to why he is not offering the homeless woman help. Unlike the businessman‚ the young woman understands that because he is a part of a unified democracy‚ it should be his moral obligation to donate to those in need whenever possible. A moral engaged citizen is someone who is not only dedicated to the wellbeing of his or her democracy as a whole‚ but actively participates to maintain it. Without active engagement‚ there is a lack
Premium Law Political philosophy Sociology
decision though‚ because their money is rightfully theirs. There is no reason for the wealthy to be obliged to help the poor. The wealthy should only help the poor if they feel compelled to do so. It is not a law that they must do so‚ rather a social obligation and even with that they do not have to. We need to show the poor how to help themselves‚ rather than being dependent on other people in
Premium Working class Interest rate Middle class
BA 161 Obligations and Contracts Midterm Summary: Title I – OBLIGATIONS Chapter 1: General Provisions Definition Article 1156. An obligation is a juridical necessity to give‚ to do‚ or not to do. (n) Sources of obligation Article 1157. Obligations arise from (1) Law; (2) Contracts; (3) Quasi-contracts; (4) Acts or omissions punished by law; and (5) Quasi-delicts. (1089a) Article 1158. Obligations derived from law are not presumed. Only those expressly determined in this
Premium Law
Many philosophers have pondered the immense question surrounding the prima facie moral obligation to obey the law. Do we have a moral obligation to do as the law tells us‚ outside of the fact that the law deems it illegal? There are many opinions on this‚ such as Wolff’s idea that there is in fact no moral obligation for anyone to obey the law because there is no legitimate state with control over people. This is one of the many viewpoints discussed throughout time‚ but there is a more level headed
Premium Prima facie Law Political philosophy
This perspective of Suarez as occupying an intermediate position between voluntarism and naturalism has been questioned by Terrence Irwin. In Obligation‚ rightness and natural law‚ Irwin places Suarez squarely in the voluntarist camp when it comes to moral obligation and moral law. Despite lending a greater degree of coherency to Suarez’s position‚ I believe that Irwin is fundamentally mistaken for characterizing Suarez’s philosophy as voluntarist. Most notably‚ the rhetorical move is mistaken for
Premium Morality Philosophy Ethics