"Thomas hobbes vs immanuel kant" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 29 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosopher Thomas Hobbes argued that government was best if it was autocratic‚ an all-powerful sovereign. To understand Hobbes’s reasoning‚ it is crucial to first understand his view on man’s conditions in an anarchic environment. In Hobbes’ perspective‚ man’s life in the state of nature was “solid‚ poor‚ brutish‚ and short” because man is selfish and violent. Without institutions to provide security‚ man was always in a constant state of war. These anarchic conditions compel men to look after

    Premium Political philosophy Government Thomas Hobbes

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enlightenment And Kant

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was the most influential thinker of the Enlightenment era and one of the greatest Western philosophers of all times. According to Kant‚ the Enlightenment can be defined as‚ “A person’s emergence from his self-sustained dependency.” ( What is Enlightenment? ). Kant believed that in order to break away from dependency‚ one must be able to think for himself. However‚ the only way to fully exercise freedom was to act morally. In the “Groundwork for the Metaphysics

    Premium Immanuel Kant Age of Enlightenment Philosophy

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    aristole and kant

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    it comes to the wide spectrum that is ethical theories‚ Aristotle and Immanuel Kant are on the far edges of both sides. Where Aristotle believes that happiness is the centerpiece of morality‚ Kant is the direct opposite and believes that happiness is not the focal point of morality. If these two were both living at the same time‚ it would quite the debate to have seen unfold. By illustrating a dialogue between Aristotle and Kant‚ a better understanding of their theories in regards to happiness.

    Premium Ethics Morality

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes argues that the state of nature is a state of perpetual war of all against all and consequently‚ the life of man in the state of nature "solitary‚ poor‚ nasty‚ brutish and short" (xiii‚ 9). In this paper I will explain Hobbes’ arguments that support his claim to the state of nature. I will also assess these arguments and state that they are not valid and‚ therefore‚ not sound. I will then talk about the most controversial premise‚ relative scarcity of goods‚ and how Hobbes would respond

    Premium Political philosophy State of nature Thomas Hobbes

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant and Descartes

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Liz Johnson December 12‚ 2012 Kant and Descartes “Idealism is the assertion there are none but thinking thing beings. All other things‚ which we believe are perceived in intuitions‚ are nothing but presentations in the thinking things‚ to which no object external to them in fact corresponds. Everything we see is just a construction of the mind.” (Prolegomena). Idealism maintains that there are no objects in the world‚ only minds. According to idealism‚ the existence of outer objects is

    Premium Immanuel Kant Perception Metaphysics

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Rationalism

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    will describe philosopher Immanuel Kant’s integration of both philosophical beliefs of rationalism and empiricism‚ and why both “experience and reason” are important for “…constructing our knowledge of the world” (Chaffee‚ 6.5‚ Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)). Kant wanted to bring together both the different thought schools of rationalism and empiricism because he believed people could not have one without the other; we can’t have reason without experience and vice versa. Kant wanted to accomplish this

    Premium Immanuel Kant Empiricism Mind

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction: The philosophies of Thomas Hobbes are inarguably essential foundations in materialistic thought. Idealists during his time believed that there reality is made up of concepts and nonmatter. In response to the challenge of explaining concepts that seemed only explicable through idealist thinking (such as thoughts and emotions)‚ Hobbes used logic and reasoning to develop materialist theories – some impressively similar in nature to neurobiology. His pessimistic views of society are drawn

    Premium Thomas Hobbes Political philosophy Social contract

    • 2692 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    the two political philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Thomas Hobbes was born on April 5‚ 1588 and he was best known for his work on political philosophy. His book Leviathan established the foundation for most of Western political philosophy. In Leviathan‚ Hobbes set out his doctrine of the foundations of states and legitimate governments. Much of the book demonstrates the necessity of a strong central authority to avoid chaos and disorder. Hobbes hypothesizes what life would be

    Free Political philosophy John Locke

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant: Goodness

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant: Goodness The philosopher I used is Immanuel Kant. He was very practical in his thinking of goodness. A quote of his was "I ought‚ therefore I can". His view was good anything is under good will . He believed good will was the primary goodness‚ good in its purest form‚ and that it couldn’t be corrupted. Good feelings and good intentions and actions can be interpreted in different ways; man can corrupt these things into evil...even though it still might be good in that man’s eyes

    Premium Good and evil Philosophy Immanuel Kant

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    thoughts on this. Hobbes believed we are all naturally evil and should be contained. Locke believed humans are reasonable and can rule themselves. I think humans are naturally evil‚ but Locke brings up some valid points as well. Hobbes states that without a government there would be nothing but chaos. Even though there are sizable amounts of good people‚ the bad would find ways to control‚ torture‚ or do other evil things before good could act. A single strong ruler like Hobbes believes is the way

    Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes Human

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 50