Malaysia in the aftermath of economic crisis Malaysia Airlines had from a surplus to a deficit. The MAS has changed over to state enterprise and inaugurated a new CEO from the government. He started the business turnaround plan was changed MAS system. Since then the business turnaround plan and efforts record a surplus and they cancel small income root in order to make more profit. In addition‚ they were converted from ‘Point to Point’ to ‘Hub and spoke’. The hub and spoke model is almost all of
Premium Airline Low-cost carrier
The Carbonated Soft Drink (CSD) industry is a profitable one despite the “Cola Wars” between the two largest players – Coke and Pepsi. Such profitability can be understood by analyzing the CSD’s industry structure in terms of “Porter’s five forces.” Threat of New Entry The existing players in the soft drink industry have much advantage relative to new entrants. First‚ supply-side economy discourages new entrants by forcing them to enter the market in large scale. CSD’s demand side benefits
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Cola
Mapping the South Asian Telecommunication Industry using Porter’s Five Forces Analysis Telecommunication industry‚ which is an oligopolistic market‚ is growing rapidly almost everywhere in South Asia. Along with the “Voice” Business moving in to a saturated state‚ the operators are focusing on growing revenues through data business. However‚ data being a low margin business many operators are shifting from simply providing data to becoming a life style requirement provider. In terms of access technologies
Premium Telecommunication Telephone Telecommunications
with maximizing profits not the public good. These two factors have resulted in the American television industry as an almost entirely commercial entity. American television is able to operate as a commercial industry because of the culture of consumption in place that is promoted by the American government. This culture started early on with television airwave licenses being
Premium United States Mass media Corporation
1. Competitive rivalry – This is the rivalry with other airlines in your existing markets or future markets. Take for example of Malaysia Airlines‚ it will have to identify and segment its markets first. Probably it will come out with a cross matrix segments of: a. geographical markets b. demography c. Travel purposes. Let view one of the segment‚ geographical .. for Malaysia. Then we can see straight away the prominent competitor which is Air Asia. The competitor will be one of the considerations
Premium Malaysia Airlines Airline Kuala Lumpur
competitive forces model and how information systems may be used to influence a firms competitive position within it’s industry. Provide a defensive and an entrepreneurial example of how information technology/systems could be used to influence each of the forces. Porter’s Five Forces Model Porter’s Five Forces model is often used as a tool for analyzing industries and competitive structures within them. An industry’s profit potential is determined by either one or a combination of five competitive
Premium Strategic management Supply chain management Supply chain
Power Conclusion questions: 1) To what extent do individual buyers have the ability to negotiate low purchase prices with typical firms in this industry? a. Answer- Consumers can’t negotiate prices with fast food restaurants. However‚ there is a large degree of internal rivalry in the industry‚ with a very strong cross-price elasticity present in the industry. This encourages low prices due to a strong degree of substitution and gives consumers back some power. 2) To what extent do purchase prices
Premium Food Fast food Fast food restaurant
relation to the external environment and industry structure currently facing your chosen organization. Description/Focus: You will conduct a ‘five forces analyses’ for an industry of your choice. Based on your analysis‚ you need to indicate how profitable do you think the industry currently is and what are the factors driving that profitability. Also discuss how will these factor change in the future and what will be the effect of these changes on industry profitability. 40% Friday‚ Week 6 10 A4
Premium Thought Strategic management Critical thinking
Porter’s Five Competitive Forces Model Tirso A. Ronquillo‚ Ph.D. Batangas State University‚ Philippines taronquillo@yahoo.com BACKGROUND There are a number of models and frameworks used in the analyses of competitiveness of engineering universities in the context of internationalization and globalization. Although much can be derived from such analyses‚ it is argued that universities that can be harnessed to provide competitive advantage can be best analyzed when regarded as an industry. In
Premium Strategic management Higher education Porter five forces analysis
FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Exhibit III-1 Five Forces Affecting Industry Structure ENTRY BARRIERS Economies of scale Proprietary product differences Brand identity Switching costs Capital requirements Access to distribution Absolute cost advantages Proprietary learning curve Access to necessary inputs Proprietary low-cost product design Government policy and international treaties Expected retaliation RIVALRY DETERMINANTS Industry Growth Fixed (or storage) costs/value-added Intermittent overcapacity
Premium Barriers to entry Brand Substitute good