Divyang.Chandiramani 1st BA.LLB – B Roll no. 1316165 The Government Of India Act of 1919 Ms.Mukta Mane School of Law‚ Christ University Index Serial no | Topic | Page no‚ | 1 | Research Methodology | 3 | 2 | Government of India Act Of 1919 | 4 | 3 | Bibliography | 9 | Research Methodology: Aim To study the Government of India Act of 1919 with regard to the Montague-Chlemsford reforms. Significance These reforms made huge changes in the executive‚ judiciary and the legislature
Premium British Empire India Bihar
there is a remedy’ ubi jus ibi remedium; which provides the fundamental concept that the complainant who has a grievance cognizable by the law may be assured of a remedy through the courts. Ubi jus ibi remedium has been a fundamental concept of our legal system‚ and the complainant who has a grievance cognizable by the law may be assured of a remedy through the courts. The work of the constitutional mandate is that courts must grant ‘appropriate relief’ or ‘appropriate and just’ remedy where there
Premium Law Human rights Habeas corpus
Torts Assignment 2011 Semester 2 Fred v Ivan- Battery Battery is committed when there is an intentional‚ direct‚ and unlawful contact or without consent to another’s person. Ivan intentionally made unlawful contact with Fred when he thrust his hands into Fred’s pocket. It was apparent that although the contact was with his pants’ pocket rather than directly to the body‚ the contact did involve some element of forces and that ‘the least touching of another in anger is battery’. Hence‚ the element
Premium Tort Negligence
TORTS ESSAY ONE Scenario: Pilot‚ Dan and Farmer In order to understand this scenario one must grasp the types of torts. We have intentional torts; negligence; and strict liability. (Torts.uslegal.com‚ 2015‚ Types of Torts - Torts. Retrieved 4 May 2015‚ from http://torts.uslegal.com/types-of-torts). An intentional tort is basically a “civil wrong doing” that happens when the “wrong doer” intentionally causes damages to another. (Torts.uslegal.com‚ 2015‚ Types of Torts - Torts. Retrieved
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
Equitable remedies seek to prevent or redress harm caused by the breach of equitable and legal principles. Unlike the common law remedy of damages‚ they are not punitive in either nature or intent. Equitable remedies refer to specific types of remedies available in court cases that can only be granted by a judge. A judge will grant‚ or not grant‚ a given equitable remedy based on the circumstances of a particular case. As such‚ equitable remedies are different from legal remedies or remedies granted
Premium Common law Contract Judicial remedies
Auditor Liability in Canada A & B Is it reasonable for a potential investor or existing shareholder to rely on audited financial statements that a corporation makes available for public consumption? Should an investor be able to sue a corporation’s auditor if audited financial statements materially misrepresent the financial status of the company audited? a. Should a potential investor only be able to sue the corporation? b. Should there be any limit on the auditor’s liability? Negligent
Premium Financial audit Audit External auditor
CYBER TORTS WITH REFERENCE TO CYBER CRIME INTERFACE BETWEEN TORT AND OTHER AREAS OF LAW CYBER TORT AND CYBER CRIME- AN INTRODUCTION A space without frontiers is known as cyber space and the laws governing it is known as cyber
Premium Law Human rights Common law
INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS LAW The Law of Tort Core Reading: Lucy Jones‚ Introduction to Business Law (Oxford University Press‚ 2011). Chapter 11 on The Tort of Negligence (Refer to pages 340 – 374). Please note that we ARE NOT going through every single areas in relation to negligence. For instance‚ the area on nervous shock. Aims and Objectives: - To enable students to appreciate the general law of tort‚ especially the concept of negligence; To understand how this area applies
Premium Tort Contract Common law
The aim of tort law is to compensate the claimant and to deter defendants’ discuss whether the rules of causation and remoteness of damage fulfil this aim. The rules of causation state that the claimant has to prove that the defendants breach of duty was the factual cause of material damage‚ when considering the facts of Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital Management Committee (CKHMC) where the claimants husband became ill after drinking tea which had arsenic‚ when taken to hospital‚ the doctor
Premium Tort law Tort Law
Common law duties were then set to provide and maintain: Safe place of work‚ safe means of access/egress Safe systems of work Safe appliances‚ equipment and plant Competent and diligent people - selection‚ training and supervision THE TORT OF NEGLIGENCE - breach of common law legal duty of care to exercise reasonable care towards others‚ resulting in loss‚ damage or injury. Key defining case - Donoghue V Stevenson (1932). Three main points to test for negligence: 1. Defendant
Premium Tort Law