Title: Theories of Justice Compare and contrast each of the three theories of justice Provide illustrative examples of each theory Write a conclusion identifying your preferred theory of justice along with your rationale for choosing the theory Retribution (Deserts Theory) This theory states that people should be punished only if they have done something to deserve it‚ and only to the extent to which it is deserved. This theory is only concerned with the past‚ which means it supports
Premium Punishment Criminal justice Justice
Angie Z. Tutorial Section: D115 December 6‚ 2010 Compare and contrast the ‘social contract theories’ of Thomas Hobbes and John Rawls. Which theory is more persuasive? Be sure to explain what Rawls means by ‘the original position‚’ and the ‘veil of ignorance‚’ and why those concepts do not figure in Hobbes’ theory. Social Contract Theory holds that the only consideration that makes actions right is that action is in accordance with an agreement made by the rational people for governing their
Premium Social contract Political philosophy John Rawls
good and evil for thousands of years‚ and in those thousands of years many strange ideas have been formed. Of all those ideas on the nature of ethics and what is ultimately most good and bad‚ emerged three major philosophical theories on ethics. The three major theories on ethics are ethical egoism‚ utilitarianism‚ and deontology. In this paper I will compare and contrast all three and show why ethical egoism is strongest argument for basing your ethical code on. The
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
pursuit of self interest‚ or for firms profit maximisation when actions of individuals or firms affect others. There are many notable theories that have been put down trying to form a guideline on how to solve the problem of what is right or wrong good or bad‚ below are three theories I have listed: 1. Utilitarianism Ethical Theory: J. S Mill The view of this theory is among competing alternatives one ought to do that which produces the greatest happiness overall for all concerned. A key aspect in
Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant
values governed by deontological rules. [edit]Divine command theory Main article: Divine command theory This section requires expansion. (June 2008) Although not all deontologists are religious‚ some believe in the ’divine command theory’. The divine command theory is a cluster of related theories that state that an action is right if God has decreed that it is right.[9] William of Ockham‚ René Descartes and eighteenth-century Calvinists all accepted versions of this moral theory‚ according to Ralph
Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant
Contemporary ethical theory begins with G. E. Moore (1873–1958). Moore opened up new issues for consideration and altered the focus of ethical discussion. Moore believed that the task of the ethical philosopher is to conduct a “general inquiry into what is good.”This seems reasonably straightforward‚ down to earth‚ and useful. If you know what good or goodness is‚ and if you know what things are good‚ then you also know what proper conduct is‚ right? This‚ at any rate‚ is what Moore maintained
Premium Management Strategic management Sociology
I can completely relate to your views on how Martin Luther King Jr. used the utilitarian approach for ethical decision making. Your examples for individualism and utilitarian added nicely to your views. Two more ethical decision making approaches that Martin Luther king also used are moral-rights and justice. For moral rights‚ “managers need to avoid interfering with the fundamental rights of others‚ such as the right to privacy‚ the right of free consent‚ or the right to freedom of speech” (Daft
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
It is described as “duty” from the word “deon” from Greek (CVP‚ p.10). The thing that determine what "right" is its settlement with a moral standard based on this theory is the rightness part of the action have to be greater than the good of it. Deontology got its foundations from Immanuel Kant. Kant’s theory is considered deontological for numerous reasons. Starting off‚ Kant states that in order for people to act moral‚ With ulterior motive means its based upon wants ‚ desires and references with
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
Rudiment Principles in The Theory of Tax Dr. Jack Itzhak Barsheshet‚ Ph.D. Table of Contents Chapter One – Introduction 1. Preface 4 2. Jurisdiction to impose Tax 6 The Social Treaty and the Origin of Taxing 6 Historical Development 7 The Purpose of Tax 8 "Normative Tax Structure" and "Tax Expenditures" 8 Taxing and Justice 10 Distribution of Tax Burden 13 Does tax breaches Fundamental Rights? 16 Chapter Two – Postulates 3. Terms 20
Free Tax
Traditional Ethical Theories Consequentialist (teleological) Non- Consequentialist (deontological) - Act in the way that brings about the best consequences - Concentrate on the act being perform Egoism (outcome: desirability) Kant (ethics of duties) Nature: Nature: act accordingly to self-interest based on desires free (Adam Smith) Example: Correct if morals actors think it is correct (rational/logical/reasonable) not depends on situations Categorical imperative- right
Premium Ethics