will ask someone (cold call) for the lessons learned in the case. You should be able to concisely summarize the key learning objectives derived from the readings‚ the case and/or the class discussion. USE OF EXCEL TEMPLATES Try to develop a valuation excel template that allows you to enter data regarding an asset/cost approach‚ comparable market value approach‚ and discounted cash flow approaches. I have posted a few examples on Blackboard under “Resources”. You can use this template for the
Premium Business Finance Management
Venture Capitalists: Trendsetter Inc. TEACHING ENTREPRENEURIAL THOUGHT & ACTION 20 March 2012 Richard T. Bliss‚ PhD Trendsetter Inc. Learning Objectives 1. The entrepreneur/VC relationship 2. Exposure to deal term sheets 3. Moving beyond valuation 4. VC negotiations 2 The Entrepreneur/VC Relationship Entrepreneur VC 3 The Entrepreneur/VC Relationship • Provisions to address adverse selection − due diligence − staging/milestones − use of convertible preferred shares • Provisions
Premium Negotiation Preference Contract
frequently applied in company’s valuation and investment project valuation each investment is evaluated of future decisions over its useful life based on the expected cash flows. The result is net present value (NPV) and a positive NPV show that investment creates value. It is a notion that EVA approach requires less information than a DCF valuation‚ or that it provides a better estimate of value is false. The EVA approach should yield the same value as a DCF valuation (DAMODARAN)‚ and it requires
Premium Net present value Free cash flow Discounted cash flow
this aspect and as a result don’t even get into the consideration of professional angels or VCs‚ specifically when it involves projecting financials and valuations 3. Seek an outside and ‘professional perspective’. Financials and company valuations are complicated factors with critical ramifications. Take too much money now at a low valuation and you sacrifice a significant percentage of equity ownership of your company. And if you take too little‚ you risk running out of money. Apropos‚ it is
Premium Venture capital Finance Investment
Ratio Analysis Perform traditional comparative and trend analysis as well as multivariate financial statement analysis for 1980 to 1990. Can you analyze the performance of Wheeling Pittsburgh in a manner that reveals if WHX was heading towards distress before 1985? The table below shows calculated financial ratios for the period 1980-1990. Calculation details include: * ROE was calculated using Reported Net Income prior to preferred dividends and Total Common Equity without including
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Fundamental analysis
tradeoffs in using Multiples versus DCF analysis? DCF Valuation 1. Forecast revenue for each year for from the firm’s financial data. 2. Select appropriate discount rate based on WACC 3. Discount each cashflow back to it present value 4. Obtain the terminal value through an application of terminal value multiple 5. You add these values together 6. Using this method‚ Martin calculates the price of Cox’s share to be $54.29 Multiple Valuation: 1. Identify comparable firms that have growth‚ cashflow
Premium Discounted cash flow Option Fundamental analysis
about what assets or products to invest in‚ how to manage cash and how to raise funds for growth. Topics include the role of corporate finance‚ cash flow and financial statement‚ time value of money‚ discounted cash flow valuation‚ interest rate and bond valuation‚ stock valuation‚ net present value‚ and making capital investment decisions. Text Book Stephen A. Ross‚ Randolph W. Westerfield‚ and Bradford D. Jordan‚ Fundamentals of Corporate Finance‚ Seventh edition‚ Irwin McGraw-Hill‚ 2006
Premium Finance Investment Net present value
Q-1 What valuation(s) can we place on the business? What method(s) did you use to arrive at the valuation(s)? Valuation Based on Discounted cash Flow Discounted Cash Flow Paint Pen Value using this model is $8.17M. The WACC used for discounting cash flows was 16%. We had made the following assumptions about revenues projections which were based on our growth strategy: 15% growth rate in FY-1997R 17% growth rate in FY-1998E 20% growth rate in FY-1999E 25% growth rate in FY-2000E
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Fundamental analysis
Executive Summary From our DCF calculations‚ the value of Torrington as a stand-alone entity is $1.181 billion. However‚ the maximum purchase price for Torrington should only be $641 million. The optimum debt amount for this transaction would be $301 million. This amount of debt would result in a total debt to capital ratio for Torrington of 47%‚ within the range for a BBB “investment grade” debt rating. The combined entities‚ Torrington-Timken‚ would produce an interest coverage ratio of 3.2‚
Premium Discounted cash flow Weighted average cost of capital
Courteau et al (2000) analyse whether different valuation models are same when a terminal value calculation based on price is used. They conclude that RI is dominant to CF when terminal price forecasts are not obtainable. Penman and Sougiannis (1998) examine the differences in model estimates by using a portfolio of ex post realizations of financial statement data. They conclude that methods based on projecting GAAP accrual earnings give lower valuation errors than forecasting cash flows. The inconsistent
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Weighted average cost of capital Cash flow