Yield of CuCl2.2DMSO Formula weight (Mr) of CuCl2 = 63.55 + (35.45 x 2) =134.45g/mol Formula weight of product CuCl2.2DMSO = 134.45 + 2[16 + 32.06 + (12.01 x 2) + (1.0079 x 6)] = 290.704g/mol Mass of CuCl2= 0.850g Equation for reaction CuCl2 + 2DMSO -> CuCl22DMSO Mole ratio between CuCl2 and CuCl22DMSO = 1:1 Mole of CuCl2 = Mass/ Mr = 0.850/134.45 = 0.00632 moles Since the ratio between CuCl2 and CuCl22DMSO = 1:1‚ mole of CuCl2DMSO is also 0.0063 moles. To find theoretical yield of CuCl2
Premium Stoichiometry Yield Mass
The internal rate of return (IRR) and the net present value (NPV) techniques are 2 investment decision tools that satisfy the 2 major criteria for the correct evaluation of capital projects. This criterion is that the techniques should incorporate the use of cash flows and the use of the time value of money. This makes them viable techniques for evaluating investment proposals. The Net Present Value is one of the techniques that are used by firms when evaluating which investment proposals to take
Premium Net present value
Job evaluation by ranking method Job evaluation by ranking method 1. Overview of ranking The ranking method is simple to understand and practice and it is best suited for a small organization. Jobs are compared to each other based on the overall value of the job to the organization. The ‘worth’ of a job is usually based on judgements of skill‚ effort (physical and mental)‚ responsibility (supervisory and fiscal)‚ and working conditions. 2. Advantages of ranking • Simple. “Alternation” method
Premium Ranking Wage
Yield to Maturity Kindra Hill University of Phoenix MMPBL/503 Wk 5 June 27‚ 2010 Scenario: A coworker of yours was discussing her investments with a broker. Your coworker was confused because she had purchased a 10% bond but the broker kept repeating that it had a 9% yield to maturity. Explain the concept of yield to maturity. This paper will explain the concept of yield to maturity in reference to bonds. It will allow for understanding of the difference in the stated rate of
Premium Bond Finance
MIRR VS. IRR Charles Beale Ashford University Business 650 Managerial Finance Professor Rick Kwan September 17‚ 2012 The Modified Internal Rate of Return is an underused measure for selection of projects that a company can choose because it is more effective at dealing effectively with periodic free cash flows that develop from the time that an asset is purchased through its life to the point where it is sold‚ ranking projects and variable rates of return through
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Rate of return
Harding‚ Coolidge‚ and Hoover were Republicans that believed in pro-business and there was no need to regulate businesses. They wanted to keep taxes down and business profits up and give business more availability credit in order to expand. They had a high tariff on imported goods which helped American manufactures. All though they had many similarities‚ they also had different approaches to their campaign. Warren Harding conservatives‚ affable manner‚ and "make no enemies" campaign strategy
Premium Warren G. Harding Republican Party Herbert Hoover
Stating Emotions Effectively Illogical Fallacies Irrational fallacies lead to illogical conclusions and result in debilitative motions‚ and since we aren’t usually aware of these thoughts‚ they are very powerful. 1. The Fallacy of Perfection – people who accept this fallacy believe that a worthwhile communicator should be able to handle every situation with complete confidence and skill; subscribing to this fallacy can lead to the disapproval of others and it can also diminish self- esteem. 2
Premium Emotion Feeling
appraisals? I would recommend a forced distribution list to organizations that are large in size and are looking to create a process oriented approach. About 20% of Fortune 1‚000 companies and growing are using this approach. “Some say forced ranking is not only the best method‚ but an essential practice to turn a struggling company into a market-dominating one.” (Bates‚ 2003) This approach is the best way to identify your high performing individuals and also the bottom performs who should be
Premium Management Organizational studies and human resource management Performance
holders at serious odds. Equity holders want to take massive risks to try and save firm because they have no skin left in the game. Chapter 17: * Only standard DCF (like from midterm) * will not be tested on Why can IRR be misleading? * Multiple IRRs * Timing problem * Scale problem When do we prefer preferred over common stock? * Bankruptcy * Dividends Agency Costs: * Example: stockholders vs bond-holders during bankruptcy * Agent acts in interest
Premium Inflation Monetary policy Bond
Running head: A COMPARISON OF EVA AND NPV A Comparison of EVA and NPV (discuss the differences and similarity of EVA and NPV; why would companies choose to adopt EVA‚ implementation issues; chronicle the implementation experience of EVA on a real life company). 1 A COMPARISON OF EVA AND NPV 2 A Comparison of EVA and NPV (discuss the differences and similarity of EVA and NPV; why would companies choose to adopt EVA‚ implementation issues; chronicle the implementation
Premium Corporate finance Value added Investment