Republic of the Philippines FOURTH JUDICIAL REGION REGIONAL TRIAL COURT BRANCH 45 San Jose‚ Occidental Mindoro OCCIDENTAL MINDORO ELECTRIC CIVIL CASE NO. R-1681 COOPERATIVE‚ INC. (OMECO) as Represented by its Chairman and President of the Board of Directors SAMUEL VILLAR and its General Manager ALFRED A. DANTIS‚ Plaintiffs‚ -versus- -for- ISLAND POWER CORPORATION RESCISSION AND RESOLUTION (IPC)‚ OF CONTRACT AND DAMAGES Defendant‚ x-------------------------------------------x
Premium Provinces of the Philippines Prime number Oriental Mindoro
Title of issue: ‘Observation of Civil Proceedings’ Name (Student): Arjun Singh Course: BBA.LLB P.R.N. No.: 10010224062 Batch: 2010-15 Name of the Court: DISTRICT & SESSION COURT HISAR Date of Observation: 24/02/2015 Case No. I: CS/183/2015 Title of the Case: KALU SINGH v. RAHUL Stage of the case: Prelimnary Hearing Appearance made by the parties: Sh. Ram Chandar Kakkar the ld. Defendant counsel appeared for the defendant i.e. Sh. Rahul. The plaintiff didn’t appear. Proceedings
Premium Legal terms Civil procedure
Melzer 1 Garrison L. Melzer Professor Gordon Williams American Literature 26 January 2015 Legislation Derailed On the Cannibal Train Mark Twain’s metaphorical satire‚ “Cannibalism in Cars”‚ demonstrates the self-serving nature of government through a bizarre story that follows the actions of the men on a train attempting to save themselves through a parliamentary process. The scenario represents the often misguided collective conscience of the government
Premium Ku Klux Klan Ulysses S. Grant Reconstruction era of the United States
Tenzin Lama Professor Kurland Business Law 30 April 2014 Eaton v. Waldrop Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama‚ __ So. 3d __ (2010). 45 So.3d 371 (2010) Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. James M. EATON‚ Jr. v. Bobby Joe WALDROP. 2081095. -- March 05‚ 2010 Type of Action: Right to a trial by jury to set aside a deed Facts: On December 16‚ 2005‚ James M. Eaton‚ Jr.‚ and Marguerite Eaton filed a complaint against Waldrop alleging that Waldrop had fraudulently induced James to deed certain property situated
Premium Jury Court Appeal
Case Brief example‚ p. 16 text Case Citation Kuehn v. Pub Zone‚ Maria Karkoulas‚ et al‚ 835 A.2d. 692‚ Superior Court of N.J. Appellate Division‚ 2003 Parties Karl Kuehn/Plaintiff/ Appellant. Pub Zone/Defendant/Appellee Original Legal Action PL sues D in negligence for damages from injuries suffered caused by the D’s failure of meeting the duty of exercising reasonable care to protect PL‚ a business patron. Facts Rhino and Backdraft were 2 members of the motorcycle gang by the name of
Premium United States Civil procedure Appeal
Business Law 110 Mr. Blackmun Case Study Problem #1 September 16‚ 2009 Case Study: Arbitration The issue pertaining to this case is whether a court can set aside an arbitration award on the basis that it violates public policy‚ subsequent to Mr. Edson being released from his job after being found intoxicated while on duty and being awarded reinstatement by the arbitrators. Exxon Mobile‚ the employer‚ filed a suit claiming that the award contravenes with public policy‚ which opposes intoxicated
Premium Law Appeal Civil procedure
ARCHER V. WARNER (01-1418) 538 U.S. 314 (2003) 283 F.3d 230‚ reversed and remanded. NATURE OF CASE Leonard and Arlene Warner sold the Warner Manufacturing Company to Elliott and Carol Archer. The Archers sued the Warners in North Carolina state court for fraud in connection to the sale. The settlement was that the Warners would pay the Archers $300‚000. The Warners paid $200‚000 and executed a promissory note for $100‚000. The Warners failed to make payments on the promissory note and the
Premium Appeal United States Jury
Plaintiff AmeriPride services‚ Inc (“Plaintiffs”) initiated action pursuant to CERCLA more than sixteen years ago to recover investigation and remediation costs of about $7.75 million it incurred after a perchloroethelyne (“PCE”) contamination caused by previous owners Valley Industrial Services‚ Inc. (“VIS”) an industrial dry cleaning and laundry business using PCE as a solvent. VIS would eventually merge into Texas Eastern Overseas‚ Inc (“TEO”). After trial‚ appeal‚ and settlement with other parties
Premium Law Civil procedure Legal terms
Chapter 3 – Jurisdiction State Court: Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction: Defendant voluntarily subject themselves by: Forum Selection Clause No challenge of lawsuit OR Defendant is a resident (can be sued at permanent place of residence/business) OR Defendant is served with process while in the state (plaintiff files complaint‚ defendant receives summons = process once received‚ clock starts ticking) OR Defendant did business‚ entered/breached a K or committed a tort in
Premium Jurisdiction Civil procedure Court
JONES VS HALL Legal Environment of Business Team G: Pablo Angell Amanda Hardin Brandon Weber BUSI 3303.03 Professor Leslie E. Lenn‚ JD TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. Executive Summary 3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Statement of the Problem Summary of the Issues Analysis and Solutions Recommended Action 1. Type of case: The type of cases leading up to this case are‚ in order of subject‚ Recording Communications Without Permission‚ Resisting Arrest‚ Violation/ Deprivation of Civil
Premium Law Appeal United States