Res judicata literally means that the matter has already been decided and the meaning of a special plea of res judicata is that the matter or question raised by the other side has been finally adjudicated upon in proceedings between the parties and that it therefore cannot be raised again.1 There are requirements that should be satisfied for a special plea of res judicata to be granted which are; the dispute is between the same parties‚ for the same relief and on the same cause of action.2 These
Premium Common law Dispute resolution Lawsuit
Illegal association - Section 11(2) of the companies act 1956 talks about illegal association which states No company‚ association or partnership consisting of more than twenty persons shall be formed for the purpose of carrying on any other business that has for its object the acquisition of gain by the company‚ association or partnership‚ or by the individual members thereof‚ unless it is registered as a company under this Act‚ or is formed in pursuance of some other Indian law. As important
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Company Law
“UST Inc” case study The primary business risks associated with UST are as follows: First‚ legal challenges will cause litigation expenses‚ lawsuits expenses and settlement payments‚ which will decrease the operating income and cash flow and will increase the risks of debt default. From the industry level‚ the smokeless tobacco manufactures have faced less exposure to health related lawsuits than cigarette manufactures because the scientific evidence linking smokeless tobacco to cancer is less
Premium Finance Cigarette Tobacco
Debating can be a daunting prospect for people who have never participated in a debate before. It should not be! In this section‚ the key terms of debating are introduced. As with anything‚ jargon can be off-putting but debating terms are simple and easy to understand. The key terms are listed below. There are also other terms that you may come across from time to time in debating but are not essential when introducing debate to a class. Term Definition House The room in which a debate takes
Premium Debate Parliamentary procedure Argumentation theory
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 John Quincy Jones c/o (street address) city‚ state‚ by [00000] Tele: 000-000-0000 John Quincy Jones‚ Appears as: Sui Juris (FILL IN NAME OF COURT HERE) THE STATE OF (NAME OF STATE)‚ Plaintiff‚ vs. JOHN QUINCY JONES‚ Aggrieved Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: (enter your case number here) WRIT OF PRAECIPE TO THE COURT CLERK Date: (? th) Day of (month)‚ 2005 (time of trial)‚ Traffic Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2. Therefore you are respectfully
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff State
1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts 2 The Trail Court 3 Judgment of Divorce 4 Present: February 20‚ 2011 5 Hon. John Doe Justice 6 Patricia Bean‚ Plaintiff Vs. 7 David Bean‚ Defendant 8 This action was submitted to this court for consideration this 20th day of February‚ 2013. 9 The Defendant was served personally within the State of Massachusetts. 10 Plaintiff presented a verified complaint. 11 The Defendant has filed an answer or amended answer
Premium Plaintiff Pleading Complaint
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL‚ MALAYSIA v CHIOW THIAM GUAN [1983] 1 MLJ 51 FACT: An application made by the attorney general to have the plaintiff’s Statement of Claim struck out under 0.18 r. 19‚ Rules of High Court 1980 on the ground that the Statement of Claim disclosed no cause of action. The plaintiff sought for a declaration that the mandatory sentence of death under section 57(1) of the Internal Security Act was unconstitutional as being unreasonable‚ oppressive and infringing the equality provision
Premium Law Constitution Crime
George sued Jerry under a theory of intentional infliction of emotional distress‚ alleging various grievances. Jerry has moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that even if everything George alleges in the complaint is true‚ George has failed to allege an adequate basis for liability under a theory of intentional infliction of emotional distress. The issue at hand is should the court deny the motion to dismiss. The essential elements of an action for intentional infliction of emotional
Premium North Carolina Pleading Civil procedure
1. What type of act used in reaching the Verdict of this case? Why? * The act that been used in this case are Act‚ 1967 under Section 20. This act was used to analyze the case of Teoh Chye Lyn dismissal order by All staff Outsourcing Sdn. Bhd. . 2. What are the factors which are lacking in this case upon reaching the judgment? * Well to be frank‚ there is no many lacking’s in this case. This case is very short‚ simple and easy to understand whereby we can clearly see that the claimant
Premium Critical thinking Judgment Lawsuit
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC G.R. No. L-6515 October 18‚ 1954 DAGUHOY ENTERPRISES‚ INC.‚ plaintiff-appellee‚ vs. RITA L. PONCE‚ with whom is joined her husband‚ DOMINGO PONCE‚ defendants-appellants. Marcelino Lontok and Marcelino Lontok‚ Jr. for appellants. Zavalla‚ Bautista and Nuevas for appellee. MONTEMAYOR‚ J.: The Daguhoy Enterprises‚ Inc.‚ a local corporation‚ with principal office in the City of Manila filed in the Court of First Instance
Premium Complaint Pleading Mortgage