Preview

11th Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
844 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
11th Amendment
11th Amendment
AJ 200 Diaz
04-29-2014

The 11th Amendment
Do you ever wonder why law enforcements are usually the target for law suits? Or why the state can’t be sued? Well, I’ll get into more details on that further on in my essay and the reason why I asked you this question is because most likely you never actually thought about it.
The eleventh amendment states: The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. It has four main interpretation. The first is that it’s just saying that nobody can sue a state in a federal court without the consent of the state concerned, the second explanation is that it allows a state to be sued by a citizen of another state or of a foreign country, but not by a citizen of the state itself, an example would be that a citizen from Oahu can’t sue the state but a citizen from California can, the third explanation is actually the opposite of the second explain, excluding only lawsuits against a state by a citizen of a different state and the fourth explanation is broader. It says that in general, federal courts can’t hear cases against states, but Congress can take away a state’s sovereign immunity. If Congress does that, the state is no longer protected against suits in federal court. Meaning the citizens can then sue the state without having to worry about them being protected by the sovereign immunity. However, there are exceptions to these four definitions of the eleventh amendment. There are more than three exception but I will only be talking about the first three exceptions. The first exception is that a lawsuit can always be brought in federal court against a state’s subdivisions, meaning its countries, cities, or the municipal. The second exception is that a state can always consent to a lawsuit



References: Web Sites http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CONAN-1992/pdf/GPO-CONAN-1992-7.pdf http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/the-us-constitutions-eleventh-amendment.html http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1635&context=faculty_scholarship Book (eBook) http://1285415485.reader.chegg.com/reader/book.php?id=c0831444f0d91b5e0d52a16acf9591bb Online News Article ( Los Angeles Times) ~SCOTT GLOVER and MATT LAIT, October 04, 2000, Hunt for Bodies Will Test Allegations Against Perez, http://articles.latimes.com/2000/oct/04/news/mn-31237

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment Case Study

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As the attorney for Joseph, the inmate in Louisiana, I’m writing to defend his 8th amendment rights. Joseph has committed murder, sentencing him to death. In his situation, he was attempting to kill himself but misfired murdering his roommate in the other room. This accident should not be punished by death as it wasn’t attempting. Joseph’s sad and unusual case mustn’t go to the worst stage of punishment and we plead for a life in prison instead of a lethal injection.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Significance: This case gave the United States government implied powers ontop of those listed in the constitution.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Carr brothers should have been sentenced separately and given two different hearings. The Eighth Amendment may be unclear whether defendants must be given an individualized trial or not but the court’s Eighth Amendment cases have often insisted that defendants must be given “individualized sentencing” in order for the jury to find “an individualized determination” and decide whether the death penalty is appropriate. The issue is that the court has never insisted for defendants to be sentenced by themselves, at their own hearing, without any co-defendants present.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter Four – The Exclusionary Rule Vicente Farias Jose Martinez The Exclusionary Rule  The Exclusionary Rule – Evidence obtained in violation of Fourth Amendment cannot be used at trial – The primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct – What other purpose does the exclusionary rule have? The Exclusionary Rule …

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourteen amendment: Never should any state impede the life, liberty, or property of a person…

    • 4656 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pol 103 Study Guide

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The ICJ ruled in 2004 that U.S. courts must reconsider the cases of 51 Mexican citizens awaiting death sentences in the U.S. because the accused had not been granted all the rights required by an international consular treaty. The U.S. responded by withdrawing its consent for ICJ jurisdiction and found the U.S. was in breech of its violation.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights Outline Contents Introduction 3 42 U.S.C. § 1983 3 Monroe v. Pape & Related Cases 3 11th Amendment 4 Exceptions to 11th Amendment State Sovereign Immunity 5 The 11th Amendment and § 1983 7 Suits Against Officers 8 Bivens 8 Rejecting or Limiting Bivens 8 Official Immunity 9 Absolute Immunity 10 Legislative Immunity 10 Judicial Immunity 10 Witness Immunity 11 Prosecutorial Immunity 11 Qualified Immunity 12 Sequence of Analysis (“The Order of Battle”) 13 Appealability of the Denial of Qualified Immunity 15 “Reasonableness” 15 Qualified Immunity Comparison with Liability Rules 17 Evolution of Qualified Immunity 17 Governmental Liability 19 Official Policy or Custom 20 Four Incoherences in § 1983 Law 22 Remedies for What Wrongs? 23…

    • 29388 Words
    • 118 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most critical topic raised in Who’s Left Standing for State Sovereignty?: Private Party Standing to Raise Tenth Amendment Claims by Katherine Connolly is the Supreme Court and State courts oscillating view of the Tenth Amendment, the contradictory views between circuit court of appeals on the Amendment, and an analysis of private party Tenth Amendment standing. “In the decades since its adoption, American courts have vigorously debated the substantive meaning of this Amendment.” (Connolly 1540) Many of the circuit court of appeals have had a difficult time coming to an agreement on the underlying meaning of the Amendment. “Six circuit courts of appeals now hold the increasingly popular majority position that only states and not private parties may enforce the Tenth Amendment. Two circuit courts of appeals hold the once-majority position that private party standing to assert claims under the Tenth Amendment is permissible.” (Connolly 1541)…

    • 1561 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    13th amendment

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. It was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, by the House on January 31, 1865, and adopted on December 6, 1865. On December 18, 1865, Secretary of State William H. Seward proclaimed its adoption. It was the first of the three Reconstruction Amendments adopted following the American Civil War.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    iii. Enforcement- law officals tend to protect their own and make excuses even when the officer is in the wrong doing.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tenth Amendment –The Tenth Amendment is important because it allows states to hold elections. It also ensures that each state retains its power, sovereignty, independence and freedom. It is similar to the Articles of the Confederation. The Tenth Amendment was written to reassure the states that they would remain largely in charge within their own borders. Until the mid-19th century, the Tenth Amendment was often cited by state governments to prevent Federal regulation of everything from taxation to interstate commerce. Since 1837, however, various rulings…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The decision upheld the ruling of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the decision of the Court. Kennedy argued that the Eleventh Amendment makes it clear that states are immune from being sued by “Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.” This immunity is sometimes referred to as “Eleventh Amendment immunity.” Kennedy suggests, however, that the states’ immunity from private suits is “a fundamental aspect of the sovereignty which the States enjoyed before the ratification of the Constitution, and which they retain today.” The Court also looked to Article I of the Constitution to examine its stance on a state’s sovereign immunity. It found that “in light of history, practice, precedent,…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 13th Amendment

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The 13th Amendment, passed by Congress January 31, 1865, and ratified December 6, 1865, states: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." The passing of this amendment freed slaves and made it illegal to have slaves, but the 13th Amendment did not give African-Americans the equal rights that they longed for. Consequently, slavery was a major setback for African-Americans leaving them deprived of education, which in the long run made it difficult for African-Americans to obtain any type of power in the United States. This shortfall of education hindered African-Americans from…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Right of Habeas Corpus is derived from the Latin meaning “you have the body.” The meaning according to the U.S. Constitution is the right of any person to question their incarceration before a judge. The detainees of war are entitled to habeas corpus because the authorized use of military force does not activate the Suspension Clause, holding them indefinitely is a violation of the Due Process Clause, and it is undetermined whether the detainees are prisoners of war or citizens suspected of treason. As citizens of the United States we must consider if it is legal for the…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    why should I Vote

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    State and is also addressed again in Article 19 stating The right of citizens of the United…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays