Preview

12 Angry Men Small Groups

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
805 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
12 Angry Men Small Groups
Small groups refer to interactions among three or more people who are connected through a shared identity, a common purpose, and a mutual influence. A jury is a good example of a small group because it has at least 12 people in it deliberating a verdict. The movie “12 Angry Men” focuses on a jury's reflections in a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is directed to begin discussions in the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old man accused in the stabbing death of his father. How would you describe the following characteristics of groups? Cohesiveness is an amount of the fascination of the group to its members and the willingness of its members to coordinate their efforts. Members of a high cohesive group will be satisfied with the group, use “we” rather than I in discussions. For example, some jurors in the movie use “we” when discussing the trial. A related feature of groups is that they divide the labor in a way that leads to interdependence. Interdependence is when everyone relies on everyone else to do his or her part of the job well. Commitment is the state or quality of being dedicated to a cause, activity, etc. I would describe …show more content…
The reason, why I believe juror #1 is a leader is because he was the foreman of the jury. The foreman of a jury is the head juror who is responsible for maintaining order in the jury room, giving everyone a chance to speak, and communicating with the judge. So I believe you’re a natural leader for being a foreman. The reason, why I believe juror #8 is a leader is because he actively encouraged timid jurors to participate by asking for their opinions. Also, he made an effort to connect on a personal level with the other jurors. The kind of power these jurors exercise is formal power. A leader is said to have formal power when power has been formally allocated by a system or a group. The leadership is transacted by the jury listening to juror
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Physilogy
    • 266 Words
    • 1 Page

    Physilogy

    1. Explain one way in which facilitated diffusion is the same as simple diffusion and one way in which it differs.…

    • 266 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis
    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    In the movie twelve angry man, after the twelve jurors listened to the facts in the trail, the judge gives her instructions to them. The judge told them that the man could face the death penalty if he found guilty. The 12 man gather in a stifling hot room to have a concluding about the case. They start arguing and adding their own experience, culture, and understanding of people's motives as a way of reconsidering the facts. Although all the jurors had listened to the same stated facts and they were in the same situation, each one of them interprets the facts differently. This reflects the differences in people and the different ways that we view the same things.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Henry Fonda's Use Of Groupthink In 12 Angry Men
    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Henry Fonda's Use Of Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    The movie 12 Angry Men depicts a typical scene today: twelve jury members meeting to discuss a case presented to them and determine guilt or innocence of a young man accused of killing his own father. Usually the jury room is a place for discussion and debate, but the evidence has swayed all but one of the jurors into voting guilty. The group in the movie is a jury of 12 men with various backgrounds and age groups. They were placed in a deliberation room where the entire move took place.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    "12 Angry Men" Film Discussion
    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "12 Angry Men" Film Discussion

    Regarding the lack of relevant background information and assumptions, the jurors give in to rationalization. Ignoring any valid argument that is put forth, they justify their way around it to maintain a guilty verdict. This could also be called denial in that the jurors are ignoring good reasoning.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal
    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PSY328 final proposal

    Juries represent the ordinary public and therefore are more likely to judge in line with generally accepted values of the society. Justice and equity are the standards of an eligible jury, and the jury selection is meant to ensure “counterbalancing of biases” or canceling out individual biases (Hastie, Penrod & Pennington, 1983). However, jury trials are often vulnerable to the effects of prejudice and stereotypes of the jury, by geographical or historical factors, and it tend to be harmful to certain groups. For example, juror characteristics, such as gender, religion, education level, socio-economic status (Hastie et al., 1983; Wrighstman, Kassim & Willis, 1987), and racial prejudices (Urszbat, 2005). And attorneys’ intonation, posture, attractiveness, confidence, and credibility also affect juries’ perception and their judgments (Jakubaszek, 2014). Most significant, the characteristics of defendants like gender and age would affect jury decision making (Pazzulo, Dempsey, Meader & Allen, 2010). These prejudices and stereotypes cause in-group-out-group bias during the trial process. In-group bias means in-group favoritism that refers to the fact that under certain conditions people will preference and have an affinity for one’s in-group over the out-group, or anyone viewed as outside the in-group. It is usually expressed in one 's evaluation of others, linking, allocation of resources and many other ways (Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. D., 2009). And out-group bias is the phenomenon in which an out-group is perceived as being threatening to the members of an in-group ( Hewstone, M.; Rubin, M.; Willis, H., 2002) defined as out-group derogation. It is a matter of favoritism towards an in-group and the absence of equivalent favoritism towards an out-group (Brewers, Marilynn B., 1999). Outgroup derogation often…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men: Communication Analysis Paper
    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men: Communication Analysis Paper

    For an in-depth look into the workings of small groups few movies have offered more than the beloved classic, 12 Angry Men. A small group is defined as group of approximately 5 to 12 people who share a common purpose and follow similar organizing rule. 12 Angry Men, as its title suggests, depicts a story of exactly 12 men who form such a group. The movie opens in the first state of Group Development, the opening period. This is the time when people in small groups will small talk, introduce themselves, and begin to learn a little about one another. During this stage in the movie, jurors discuss the view, old buildings, hot weather colds, and some even share what they do for a living. One juror shares about his Beck and Call messenger company with ¡°37 employees.¡±…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Film Analysis: Twelve Angry Men
    • 2021 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Film Analysis: Twelve Angry Men

    The movie "Twelve Angry Men" is about a young man who is accused of stabbing his father to death. The twelve jurors have to decide whether the defendant is guilty or innocent. If the young man is found guilty, there is a mandatory death sentence (the jury needs to be unanimous in their decision). At the preliminary vote, eleven of the twelve jurors vote the young man guilty. Henry Fonda is the only one who voted the accused as not guilty because he doesn't want to send the defendant to the death penalty without discussing it. Throughout the movie, Henry uses various styles of leadership in which I will discuss further in the following section.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Conflict Twelve Angry Men
    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Conflict Twelve Angry Men

    The fact that had he not been there, the boy would have been found guilty…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Constellation of Variables
    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12 Angry Men Constellation of Variables

    In group communications theory, there are labeling terms for each contributing member of the group, and how the group interacts among one another - the result is group communication. These contributing factors of situation, goals, roles, norms, and cohesiveness make up the constellation of variables. The film 12 Angry Men depicts the constellation of variables. In the film, twelve jurors in a hot room, forced to deliberate the fate of a man accused of murder. The group comes together in an uncomfortable environment and when one of twelve jurors stands against the group, voting not-guilty for reasonable doubt, there is immediate hostility. The situation is there has to be a unanimous vote as to whether the accused man is innocent or guilty of murdering his father. The goal becomes at first to convince one juror that the accused man is guilty – to which after hours of deliberation, the goal is then flipped where 11 believe the man is innocent and 1 believes he is guilty.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Analysis 5
    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    12 Angry Men Analysis 5

    The jurors in 12 Angry Men possessed a lot of the same qualities that would typically lead to groupthink. For example, the majority of the jurors had a belief in the moral accuracy of their own decisions, that they were punishing a ‘bad’ person. They also had a stereotypical outlook on those who opposed their views, resulting in a feeling of pressure to conform. When a group like the jurors becomes too confident, it keeps them from being able to deal realistically and clearly about the task at hand. This is when groupthink occurs. Because of this, it takes a longer time to communicate and, more importantly, to reach a consensus. Group agreement can be time consuming and, when groups make speed of verdict a priority, similar to the twelve jurors, they risk accuracy in their decision-making. Due to the fact that not any one individual is fully responsible for the decision, people have a tendency to agree to faster, more intense solutions.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Small Groups
    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Small Groups

    In the essays, “Committees, Juries, and Teams: The Columbia Disaster and How Small Groups Can Be Made to Work,” and “The Hive” shows the ways to properly run a small group and how to get the correct and best results. The two essays also say what to avoid when working in a small group; for example how to avoid group polarization and why that is detrimental to small groups. The essay by James Surowiecki also explains to avoid a type of dictator in the small group, someone who is the main mouthpiece to the group and why that is a negative aspect to have in a small group. The two essays show the pros and cons of working in small groups, both authors show that if the people with in the group do not work properly together the outcome the group is working towards can be deficient. Both authors also show that if the small group works well together and abides by certain rules, the group can have a positive and efficient effect on the problem the group is working towards, like having cognitive diversity in a group. Or another positive thing to have in a small group is equality. The authors touch on the dos and don’ts of a small group environment, when following closely to these suggestions small groups can do the job they were meant to do correctly.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men

    ‘Twelve Angry Men expose the weaknesses of the Jury system as well as its strengths. Discuss.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men: Film Analysis
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    Twelve Angry Men: Film Analysis

    Twelve angry men is a 1957 American Film that originated from a play of Reginald Rose and has been directed to a film by Sidney Lumet. The movie is not just about the outcome of the trial of a Puerto Rican youth who has been accused of murdering his father, but also shows how the beliefs and attitudes of the twelve jurors lead to his acquittal. Aside from that, this movie also shows Leadership traits that can help every individual on developing their leadership capabilities. The story started when the twelve jurors were put together in a sweltering deliberation room somewhere in America where they have been asked for their verdicts whether to put the child on chair or not. Eleven of them unanimously voted that the youth is guilty and must be…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Twelve Angry Men: Summary
    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men: Summary

    Foreman: The representative of the voice of the jurors in this case. Tried to maintain order. Roses’ criticism of such a character is that not all appointed leaders of an event are great leaders. We have to search for them rather than appoint a random person. A coach of a baseball team.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics