Preview

1852-1856: The Origins Of The Republican Party

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1852-1856: The Origins Of The Republican Party
TIMELINE Date / Name of document | Historian | Summary | 1852-1856 “The Origins of the Republican Party” | William Gienapp | Ethnocultural issues and nativism played key role in ushering in the disintegration of the party system 1850s. “less a product of antislavery fervor than of a sustained competition with the Know-Nothing Party over ethnic and cultural issues”*** Principle reasons for the start of the War = (1) challenge of slavery (2) US land expansion (3) “free labor ideal” | 1860 | Herbert Donalds | Heavily stressed the role of political tensions / Ethnocultural Points out those politicians were incompetent and carried out limited democracyMainly political viewpoint | 1872-1877 “History of the Rise and Fall of the Slave Power” | Henry Wilson | Wilson had the perspective that the South was responsible for causing the Civil War. “A conflict that arose because of the militant immorality of slave society…”Northerners were perceived as saviors of the Union. Labeled the South’s intentions as “aggressive designs”. | …show more content…
“If negro had not been brought to America, the Civil War could not have occurred”Thus, argues that different perspectives on slavery from North and South made the War inevitable | 1927 | Charles and Mary Beard | Did not believe the issue of slavery was in neither the realms of politics nor social. Rather – ECONOMICAnalyzes : North vs. South as Industrialists vs. Planters. Perceived tensions between North and South over slavery… their conflicts = manifestation of their desire to control the fed gov. Why? Economic interests!

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This brutally honest titled book by Thomas J. DiLorenzo strengthens research surrounding the idea that Abraham Lincoln used slavery as an excuse to begin the Civil War. DiLorenzo portrays Lincoln as a man who manipulated his people into a war, ignored the principles of freedom, equality and states’ rights, and destroyed the original union of the Founding Fathers. Therefore it is not impossible to believe that this new image of a man could have influenced the beginning of a war not primarily with the honorable intentions so widely publicized but with other ideas that promoted the North’s own advantage and power over the Union. In fact, this honored president seems to have been painted by history into more of a heroic character of fantasy than…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years of 1830-1860, there were many conflicts on the views of slavery within our country. The North was working to bring an end to slavery with the creation of the routes to free slaves. The South was enthusiastic about the continuation of slavery with the help of the courts. The conflicts were put on hold with many compromises, but were dismantled by future legislation leading to bloodshed in America.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    current President is a Democrat but it is not clear if the Democratic Party will…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    why the war came

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why the War Came: The Sectional Struggle over Slavery in the TerritorieLincoln Reconsidered: Essays on the Civil War Era: David Herbert ...…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Write a thoughtful essay on ONE of the following questions, making sure to use evidence from A Year in the South, 1865 to support your arguments. You should refer only to Ash’s book for this assignment; outside sources are neither needed nor allowed.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a researcher studies the causes of most wars, the causes for nearly any war are usually innumerable. However, there are a select few wars that even in the presence of several different motives, one underlying object or ideal seems to always be the root of the problem. One prime example of this idea is the American Civil War wherein almost every individual soldier had a different reason for being on the battlefront. One nation whose people had grown into a melting pot had slowly been torn down the center for several decades before the inevitable war came. Slavery seemed to affect everything in the United States during the time leading up to, during, and even after the Civil War. Thus, the issue was unavoidable, and whatsoever conflict arose from this issue was not only important to those involved, but the entire country. With the issue of slavery at the national level that it rose to be at, there was absolutely no way the war and the prevailing awkwardness that followed the war could have been avoided.…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If asked, most people would blame as the cause of the civil war the issue of slavery. This is understandable; many people in the U.S. at the time were against slavery, going to far as to help runaway slaves escape to the free north. But, while slavery at face value was a major factor, international politics and economics played a major role. Several factors, including the election of Lincoln, the raid on Harper 's Ferry, the Dred Scott decision, and, most importantly, the fugitive slave law, contributed to the growing rift between the North and South and, eventually, the Civil War.…

    • 888 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Slippery Slope

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As with all great conflicts in history, it was not one factor but rather a multitude of issues that led to the breakdown of compromise during the 19th century and eventually to the Civil War. The government of the period was entirely content to sweep the issue of slavery under the rug, contrasting sharply with the strongly polar feelings of the nation, with the South wanting to expand the ‘peculiar institution’ and the North beginning to see it as a moral dilemma. The combination of these contradictory views set the stage for purely sectional political parties, the development of which precluded any further hope of peacefully settling the issue. As the federal government became increasingly complacent in its handling of slavery and the North became decreasingly tolerant of the institution, the nation split along party lines and eliminated any hope of reconciliation.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1800’s there was much turmoil over the debate of slavery and whether it was inhumane or not. Slavery caused the nation to separate into 2 factions; the north, who believe in abolishing slavery and the south who thought that slavery was a “benign institution” as quoted by Ulrich B. Phillips. There is much debate whether slavery was the prominent cause of the Civil War. Contrary to popular belief, slavery was not the ultimate cause of the Civil War; in fact the economic, cultural, and political differences between the North and South played more prominent roles in the instigation of the Civil War and influenced the beginnings of slavery.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republican Party was formed in Ripon, Wisconsin when members of the Whig party met to establish a new and better party. The Whig party opposed to slavery spreading to the west. The Republican party was also opposed to the “tyranny” of Andrew Jackson. The Whig party successfully introduced the Kanas- Nebraska act of 1854. The Kanas- Nebraska act ultimately dissolved the Missouri Compromise and it also allowed slaves of free status to be decided in territories by popular sovereignty. The Whig Party became the Republican Party on March 20, 1854. In 1856 John C. Fremont was the first Republican presidential candidate. John C. Fremont won 11 out of 16 of the northern states votes. In November 1860, Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected president over a divided Democratic Party, and six weeks later South Carolina formally seceded from the Union. Within the next six weeks, five other Southern states had followed South Carolina’s lead in seceding, and in April 1861 the Civil War began when Confederate shore batteries under General P.G.T. Beauregard opened fire on Fort Sumter in South Carolina’s Charleston Bay.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever thought about the explicit details that went into the creation of America? Slavery and the Making of America, written by James Oliver Horton and Lois E. Horton uses facts and stories to portray the life of slaves, and the evolution of slavery over several decades, and its effect on America today. The title of this book, Slavery and the Making of America is a great leeway into the authors’ main thesis of the book; “Slavery was, and continues to be, a critical factor in shaping the United States and all of its people. As Americans, we must understand slavery’s history if we are ever to be emancipated from its consequences,” (Horton). Throughout the six chapters in this book, the authors’ go into explicit details on what actions from both white Americans and African slaves led to the Civil War, the abolition of slavery and America as it is today.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rise Of Republicanism

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Uncompromising commitment to liberty and equality – A government without monarchy or aristocracy – political authority vested in the people…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Webster defines economics as "the science concerned with the making, selling, and using of goods” or in lame man terms wants and needs fulfilled with limited resources. The north and south had many differences due to diversification within their economies; such as; crop differences to the imposed tariffs on them to economic need for cheap labor i.e. slaves. The framers of the Constitution specifically tried to avoid dealing with slavery because at one time or another it was a critical part of their economic stability. These differences became noticeable and tension between the two started to kindle.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Single Party States Notes

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Jean Kirkpatrick (US ambassador-United Nations) once expressed that authoritarian state was “better than” a totalitarian state- a chance that it would move towards democracy (p.o.v expressed during the Cold War)…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is argued that class conflict gave rise to the two party system. We begin by customarily separating American political history into three periods using changes in party names as the basis of division. According to this scheme, there have been three great party alignments since the formation of the Constitution: Federalist versus Republican/Democrats Whigs against the Democrats 1830-1856, and Republicans against Democrats 1856-present.But because of Hamilton’s financial plan it helped cement the two political party system that is a part of American politics today.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays