Preview

1918-1979: A Changing Political And Economic Environment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
787 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1918-1979: A Changing Political And Economic Environment
A changing political and economic environment 1918-1979.
Liberal, Labour and Conservative party in 1918:
Liberal believed in free trade and the government having a limited role. Social reform.
Before WW1 Liberal party had dominated the government however there was growing unrest about Home Rule in Ireland and the women's suffrage movement and the increasing militant trade unions.
Appeal of the Liberal party to its traditional members (middle class, high upper class) began to decline.
The experience of war divided the Liberal party: many opposed the gown in power (especially conscription), war resulted in a coalition, many believed this decreased the Liberal parties principles and they were becoming like the conservative party.
Labour …show more content…
After 1918 a large proportion of Conservative votes came from newly enfranchised property owning women.
Within 4 years of the end of WW1 Liberals suddenly declined, not having a majority ever again.
Decline of the Liberal party:
By 1918 the Liberal party was split.
Liberal-conservatives won a landslide victory in 1918.
Conservatives were becoming a more popular party; 3x more votes than coalition liberals.
Immediate cause of decline were the actions of Lloyd George.
Lloyd George was considered a nation hero however by 1922 this changed. He had been involved in a scandal involving selling knighthoods and peerages.
He sold 1,500 knighthoods and nearly a 100 peerages.
This made the election in 1922 a disaster for the Liberal Party.
The National Labour Party (run by Lloyd George) was reduced to 53 MPS.
Rise of the Labour Party:
First Labour party was run by MacDonald in 1924. It was a minority government.
Committed to parliamentary democracy and demonstrated how moderate it was.
Opponents in Conservative party liked to compare it to the repressive regime in
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain How Successful Was The Liberal Government In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis 1909-11
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How Successful Was The Liberal Government In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis 1909-11

    The government could not fumction without money so the issue was put to the voters to decide. The Conservatives had to win a large number of seats in order to justify their rejection of the budget, however they did not and ithe election was therefore a defeat for the Conservatives. However, the Liberals no longer had an overall majority in the commons so they could only get their bills passed if they got the support of the Labour party and Irish Nationalists. The Irish Nationalists would only give their support in return for granting of Home Rule for Ireland, so the Liberal party had to include Home Rule in their policy. The Liberals were reliant on the Labour Party as Labour would only support them in return for favourable legislation for trade unions, assistance for working class candidates to become MPs. This allowed the Labour Party to develop links with uniona and allowed them to field more candidates at future elections, enabling them to challenge the Liberal Party; weakening the Liberals. After the election the budget was re-introduced into parliament and was passed by both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain why the Cpnservatives won the General Election of 1959
    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain why the Cpnservatives won the General Election of 1959

    At the time Labour was a significantly divided party with the Gaitskillites and the Bevanites meaning some support of voters was lost through lack of assurance that the party would lead with strength and could make decisions that were right for the nation and not selfish. The Labour economy policies are also a reason why they lost. Gaitskell promised to increase public spending without increasing taxes. This put his credibility under question. Another reason is that although voters were happy with the nationalisation of electricity, gas, atomic energy and airline industries they thought public ownership of coal and the railways had been a failure when they were last in government and there was little enthusiasm for further nationalisation which Labour was committed to by Clause Four of the Labour Party Constitution.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Balfour's Leadership Was Responsible for the Decline in the Popularity of the Conservative Party Between the Years 1902-1906. Explain Why You Agree or Disagree with This View.
    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Balfour's Leadership Was Responsible for the Decline in the Popularity of the Conservative Party Between the Years 1902-1906. Explain Why You Agree or Disagree with This View.

    Balfour's leadership along with other key factors, including chamberlain's influence, the Boer war and the liberal party's actions, overall led to the decline in popularity for the conservative party giving the liberals their first taste of power in the 1906 general election.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Is the Liberal Electoral Victory of 1906 Best Explained?
    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Is the Liberal Electoral Victory of 1906 Best Explained?

    The liberal’s victory in the 1906 was a very significant one due to how they won it with such an overwhelming majority; it was the biggest electoral victory since 1832. In the 1890’s the liberals were suffering from a crisis identity and they were lacking in money and morale. In the 1906 election the liberals won 49.4% of the vote and that amounted to 399 seats which was such a large margin compared to in 1900 where 45% of the vote was only 183 seats. There are four main reasons arguably why the Liberals won the1906 election and these are through Conservative faults such as the massacre in the Boer war. The education act in 1902 and Chamberlain’s tariff reform campaign also lost the conservatives a lot of support, which meant people turned to liberals just due to disliking the conservatives. The most important reason was Arthur Balfour getting involved and not making the right decisions for the conservatives and losing a lot of the voters they had before. The liberals also used a very negative campaign in order to get voters to realise the flaws in the conservative’s ideals and make them vote for the liberals just through dislike of the other parties.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Effective Were the Social Reforms of 1906 Essay Example
    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Effective Were the Social Reforms of 1906 Essay Example

    The liberal party led by Henry Campbell Bannerman won a landslide victory over the conservatives in the 1960 general election. They won 377 seats giving then an enormous majority of 84 over all other parities combined. Bannerman retired in 1908 and his successor Herbert Asquith, who brought about an increasing shift towards reform, originating from the initiatives of Lloyd George the Board of Trade and Winston Churchill the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Both of these characters were very influential in the idea of New Liberalism. New Liberalism was completely committed to radical, social reforms. This is exactly what the government tried to enforce between the years 1906-1914 and the ‘lib-labs’ (radical liberals) passed several reforms to try and liberalise Britain from the previous conservative rule.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain why free trade was an issue in the 1906 General Election campaign.
    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain why free trade was an issue in the 1906 General Election campaign.

    This was the first time the Liberals were reunited since the Boer war. This aided them in an attempt to reunite there votes aswell. This meant that they were the second biggest party after the conservatives. All they needed to do was show the weaknesses of Balfour. The final nail in the coffin was having a decisive manifesto over free trede and how they refused to do it in case it harmed the working class. It was most important to appease the working class because they were the majority of the vote but they were also the poorest people able to vote with decisiveness.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Euro Chapter 28 Outline
    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Ap Euro Chapter 28 Outline

    (36) Britain's Labour party, committed to revisionist socialism, replaced the Liberals as the main opposition party to the Conservatives.…

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Bread For All Summary
    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bread For All Summary

    H. Pelling argue that the reforms were actually unwanted by the working class: “the extension of the power of the state at the beginning of this century, which is generally regarded as having laid the foundations of the Welfare State, was by no means welcomed by members of the working class, was indeed undertaken over the critical hostility of many of them, perhaps most of them”. Pat Thane gives further evidence for this theory. The fact that the more far-reaching of the Liberal reforms only begun in 1908, after Campbell-Bannerman’s resignation, also seems to count against any theory which ascribes sole responsibility for the reforms to Labour and the working class: nothing major changed in terms of Labour MPs or working class opinion in these two years; the major change was a “New Liberal” politician taking over from a Gladstonian liberal. The ideology of individual politicians was arguably more important, and this was influenced by Booth, Rowntree, and T.H. Green. It is also important to consider the timing of the reforms – had they been due entirely to working class enfranchisement and pressure, surely they would have occurred immediately after the 1867 Reform Act, rather than in the early twentieth…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain Why the Liberal Government intr
    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Why the Liberal Government intr

    Labour Party growth was a key factor in the Liberal Governments desire to introduce reforms affecting children as the Labour Part was emerging as the party for the working class, a position that the Liberals had previously held. In the 1906 elections the Labour Party had gained 30 seats where previously they had held 2 after the 1900 election, between 1907-09 they also made some gains in by elections. David Lloyd George summarised the position of the Liberal Government in a speech where he said that the only way to guarantee Liberal support was through reform. This meant that through the years’ jop 1906-08 the Liberal government passed reforms that affected children as it was hoped it would guarantee support from the parents of the working class as it would be clear that the Liberal Government was interested in helping the working class. Growth of the Liberal Party also resulted in the development of New Liberalism in the Liberal Party which also contributed to the reforms for children.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Labour Lose The 1924 Election
    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Did Labour Lose The 1924 Election

    While the 1924 Labour government was undoubtedly one of the most important developments in party politics, there were other factors that contributed to the change from Liberal vs Conservatives in the 1880 to Labour vs conservative with Liberal's downfall by 1951. The 1924 Labour government was arguably a significant development as it was the first time Labour won an election, proving they had progressed from a small independent party to a real opponent of the Conservatives. This was significant as it showed that Labour had finally gotten their foot in the door and how Conservatives had not fully recovered from their decline in the previous 2 decades. The win was a huge shock to the Conservatives, but they won in a weak position and only lasted 10 months.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why Did The Republicans Win The 1906 Election
    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Explain Why Did The Republicans Win The 1906 Election

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Lloyd George Fall From Power
    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Lloyd George Fall From Power

    Due to this Lloyd George had to concede to the conservatives at times as he did when they demanded that cuts be made and that Lloyd George agree to the Geddes axe. This was a mistake as it led to him earning a reputation of not fulfilling promises of reconstruction and led to a decline in popularity. The conservatives only needed Lloyd George as long as he was popular with the people and therefore an asset to them, his gradual decline in popularity led to the conservatives questioning his worth. His policies also went against what they stood for the most part and even though they remained loyal to the coalition due to Bonar Law, cracks appeared when Austen Chamberlain replaced him as leader of conservatives. However, it can argued that the conservatives were being pragmatic in letting Lloyd George introduce some social reform, especially since working class had received the vote. This did not deter backbenchers and die hards who grew in number and in criticism of Lloyd George’s policies, which culminated in the formation of the anti-waste league who won two by-elections, evidence that they held influence. As Lloyd George’s unpopularity grew so did the conservative attitude change towards him except in the senior members, which also led to the fear that a split may emerge over loyalty to the coalition.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why The Conservatives Win The Election Of 1906
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Why The Conservatives Win The Election Of 1906

    Homework: Liberal electoral chances In 1906, the Liberal party won a landslide victory against the Tory party. Various factors played into this success: the ideas and concepts introduced by so called New Liberalism, combined with the public’s weariness at the Conservatives, who had been in power continuously from the 1880s. By 1906 the Tories had introduced a series of rather unpopular decisions, laws, and policies; a key example is the Boer War of 1899-1902. The Boer War was expected to be an easy victory for Britain, but turned into a gruelling series of events which was only narrowly won by the Brits.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did the Liberals Introduce Reforms?
    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Did the Liberals Introduce Reforms?

    There are many reasons why the Liberals introduced reforms. My first and in my opinion, most important reason why the Liberals introduced reforms was the politically motivated, political rivalries. Winston Churchill’s former party the Conservatives had already brought in some reforms, which showed the first signals for the Liberals to do so too. However, it was the newly formed Labour party which were the big competitors for the Liberals. They begun to start gaining votes and were an emerging threat. The Liberals wanted to win over ordinary people so that they would vote the Liberals instead of Labour. David Lloyd George realised that he would gain votes from the working class and would be kept in power if he introduced the reforms, as he makes clear in a speech given in 1906, ‘We must eliminate the widespread poverty which scars this land glittering with wealth, otherwise the working men of Britain will vote Labour instead of Liberal’. This quote makes it clear that one of the reasons the Liberals brought in the reforms was because of their concerns and rivalry with Labour.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution: The Marginalization Of Canada
    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The American Revolution: The Marginalization Of Canada

    At this time Liberal meant supporting freer trade (still almost a hundred years until actual free trade) and less government interference in the economy. This made the liberal party very popular during prosperous times because when businesses are booming, the less government management, the longer…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics