Preview

Explain why the Cpnservatives won the General Election of 1959

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
451 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain why the Cpnservatives won the General Election of 1959
02) - Explain why the Conservative Party won the General Election of 1959 – (12 marks)
WW2 made a huge dent in Britain’s economic capability in terms of international trade and the fact that half of our factories had been converted to build military equipment. Not long before the General Election the economy had begun to pick up.
At the time Labour was a significantly divided party with the Gaitskillites and the Bevanites meaning some support of voters was lost through lack of assurance that the party would lead with strength and could make decisions that were right for the nation and not selfish. The Labour economy policies are also a reason why they lost. Gaitskell promised to increase public spending without increasing taxes. This put his credibility under question. Another reason is that although voters were happy with the nationalisation of electricity, gas, atomic energy and airline industries they thought public ownership of coal and the railways had been a failure when they were last in government and there was little enthusiasm for further nationalisation which Labour was committed to by Clause Four of the Labour Party Constitution. One reason why the Conservatives won was there Stop-Go economic policy. Although the policy itself was bad the Conservatives engineered it by making it a go period when the election came round. They did this by ‘electioneering’ the Budget and cut income tax, purchase tax and the duty on beer. This made the public feel like the economy was good.
Another reason why Conservatives won is that in there manifesto they promised to stabilise the cost of living which would close the gap between rich and poor and double everyone’s standard of living. This was helped by Labour being identified with the working class rather than the nation as a whole. This was a problem as 40% of manual workers now considered themselves middle class so the Labour policies for the unemployed and working class no longer appealed to them, instead they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The government could not fumction without money so the issue was put to the voters to decide. The Conservatives had to win a large number of seats in order to justify their rejection of the budget, however they did not and ithe election was therefore a defeat for the Conservatives. However, the Liberals no longer had an overall majority in the commons so they could only get their bills passed if they got the support of the Labour party and Irish Nationalists. The Irish Nationalists would only give their support in return for granting of Home Rule for Ireland, so the Liberal party had to include Home Rule in their policy. The Liberals were reliant on the Labour Party as Labour would only support them in return for favourable legislation for trade unions, assistance for working class candidates to become MPs. This allowed the Labour Party to develop links with uniona and allowed them to field more candidates at future elections, enabling them to challenge the Liberal Party; weakening the Liberals. After the election the budget was re-introduced into parliament and was passed by both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Homework: Liberal electoral chances In 1906, the Liberal party won a landslide victory against the Tory party. Various factors played into this success: the ideas and concepts introduced by so called New Liberalism, combined with the public’s weariness at the Conservatives, who had been in power continuously from the 1880s. By 1906 the Tories had introduced a series of rather unpopular decisions, laws, and policies; a key example is the Boer War of 1899-1902. The Boer War was expected to be an easy victory for Britain, but turned into a gruelling series of events which was only narrowly won by the Brits.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Labour Government came in to power in a ‘Landslide’ election victory. The Government was led by Clement Atlee and introduced reforms. The reforms were in Social Security, Health, Housing, Education and Employment.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Labour government in 1945-1951 achieved a high degree of activity and success, despite working within ‘the aftermath of war’ which inevitably ‘brings enormous difficulties’. The Labour government devoted their power to reconstructing a better nation, one that would be a ‘better place in which to be born, to grow up, and to live and even die’. On the other hand it is possible to criticise Labour due to their ‘irresponsible’ spending.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thatcher offered different and better ideas for the country and government which many people believed an improvement, gaining her a lot of popularity amongst the public but before the Conservatives were in government with Thatcher, the Labour party had a few difficulties (such as the winter of Discontent) whilst in power, which is possibly why the Conservatives won the General election. However this win could be purely down to the conservatives and their new policies or it could’ve been down to the failure of the Labour party. I believe that it was combination of the two that led to the Conservatives win but the win, as much as it seemed likely wasn’t indefinitely certain.…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By the early twentieth century the Liberal Government was concerned that Britain was losing its status as a major industrial and military power. Concern over national security played a considerable part in persuading the government that reform was needed. However, this was only one of a handful of factors that influenced the government. As well as national security, the Government was also concerned over the national efficiency of the country. The new Labour party competed with the Liberals and promised the country social reforms, and in order for the Liberal Government to stay in power they had to offer similar reforms in order not to lose votes. Although, the simple change of attitudes within the Liberal party promoted the idea of municipal socialism and ultimately brought about reform. Lastly, the result of poverty in…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, a major reason for Labour’s victory was because Harold Wilson advocated a campaign for economic modernisation of Britain so the nation did not fall behind the excelling economies of European rivals such as West Germany. Economists raise the significant point that economic modernisation looks at the internal dynamics of a nation while referring to social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies. The Conservatives failed in every social and economic aspect of this theory, as shown in 1963, as unemployment reached approximately 800,000 making a mockery of Macmillan’s, ‘never had it so good speech.’ The inability of the Conservative Party to economically modernise Britain led not only to their downfall in the 1964 election, but also to the collapse of Britain’s economy during this era. Economists point out that as a result of Conservative mismanagement of the economic sectors, Britain faced financial hardships, including a huge balance of payments deficit, which undeniably caused higher levels of inflation, causing the cost of living for ordinary British people to rise. Moreover, the economic boom of the late 1950s and the, ‘Age of Affluence,’ had reached its end, with great saturation in the markets for consumer goods. Inevitably, poor…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 1997 to 2005 conservative party lost three general elections in a row. David Cameron has introduced much reform into the Conservative Party since his ascension into power of the Conservative Party, in December 2005. He has, in many ways, modernised the Party, and has introduced measures that are so wide reaching, that his brand of Conservatism has a name, Social Conservatism. Conservative traditionally believes on less intervention by the government. It means that if any industry and company found itself in financial difficulties then government will not help them. For example if royal mail found itself in financial difficulties then government won’t help them. But Cameron has changed this policy. He said that it is the role of government to help industries if they find. He believes that state has a key role in increasing opportunities and reducing poverty because if any industry finds itself in difficulties then it also affects unemployment. He believes that state has a key role in increasing opportunities and reducing poverty. Conservative traditionally believes on low taxes. They believe that taxes on income and company profits should be kept to minimum. So it is a natural conservative instinct to want to cut taxes. But the David Cameron and his shadow chancellor asserted that the tax cuts cannot be made at the expense of the public services. In other words they see it as most important that health, education, social services and so on should be protected even if public opinion asserts that tax should be reduced. In education it is conservative traditionally policy for the support of selective secondary schools. But Cameron believes…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A sudden demobilisation of around 300,000 soldiers was blow for the already rising unemployment and with so many unable to find work many were angered by the situation. The war had also caused massive debt and to deal with this there was cuts in the civil service, a rise of indirect taxes and the abolition of income tax which lord Liverpool himself was opposed to. These actions however seemed to make the situation worst then better. It took seven years for public finances restore to credibility and the cuts in government spending only exacerbated the depression. This also did not help the already prominent radical threat as they were highly critical of the government’s clear interest in helping the land elite. Having said this it is taken into consideration that there was not much they could do, and in the dire situation it would have been hard to appease everyone. They did take measures to ensure free trade and returning to the gold standard to help the situation. Overall they made the best of a hard situation but the war also had effect on other problems such as the demobilisation having an effect on the…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the 1920s, the Liberal vote greatly diminished and the Labour Party became the Conservatives' main rivals. Conservative prime ministers led governments for 57 years of the 20th century, including Winston Churchill (1940–45, 1951–55) and Margaret Thatcher (1979–90). Thatcher's tenure led to wide-ranging economic liberalisation and saw the Conservatives become the most eurosceptic of the three major parties. The party was returned to government in coalition, having failed to win a majority, in 2010 under the more liberal leadership of David Cameron.[12][13][14]…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Although, the Labour Party were obvious advocates of socialist policies, the Conservative election manifesto ‘had a similar commitment to full employment’6 and promised ‘an all-out housing policy.’7 Therefore, if there truly was a shift to the left in terms of public opinion as a result of a ‘people’s war’, then the resulting consensus would not have necessarily resulted in a Labour win in the election. Addison’s argument that there was a formation of a new political consensus due to a shift to the left in public opinion as a result of a ‘people’s war’ has been increasingly disputed. Although, there is an indication that the proposed implementation of social reform policies gained approval during the war, it does not necessarily reflect a movement towards the left wing in terms of public opinion. Arguably, policies that guaranteed national and social insurance were seen as the best approach in rebuilding a nation that had been crippled by total warfare and the public may have recognised this. Therefore, it could be said that as a result of a ‘people’s war’ there was an increase in support for social reform polices but not socialist ideology in…

    • 2377 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first four years after the war looked promising with the post war boom, but as stated before, that was short lived. Increased overseas competition and two decades of mass unemployment meant that while some growth did occur, the effects of WWI were deep rooted. It would take a lot more for this period to be considered a period of total growth and shake off the legacy of the First World War. Although England’s economy eventually recovered, WWI had far reaching effects on England’s economy especially with foreign trade. During the War England had to sacrifice many of its key industries to focus on the war effort. Many of the suppliers cut off from the supply of English goods either turned to competitor's brands or developed their own industries so when the war finished, many of the industries, particularly the labor intensive industries in the north, found themselves with no…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labours Victory 1945

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Labour's election victory was quite heavily down to the changes in public opinions and their perceptions of the political parties at this time of war and economic decline. In most of the public's eyes it was seen as fashionable to support a more extreme left wing party like the labour party. this would've gained Labour a lot of votes as with fashion comes a lot of numbers as most people join in latest fashions. Many people for the first time experienced the staggering amount of poverty there was in the country especially in areas such as London. It was the evacuation of children which shed light on the bigger picture of how many families were living and what conditions the children were used to. This shocked many people into thinking that they needed a government which help fix this huge amount of poverty and reduce the class barriers between the poor and the not so poor. Labour was a party that seemed able to attempt to fix this overwhelming problem, they offered a fresh faced government unlike the conservatives.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the policies that stood out to me the most was regarding education. The Conservative Party believes in making education mandatory for all individuals under 25. Under the Labour Party’s welfare system it was made possible to leave school and live under life benefits. This situation created what Conservatives refer to as a “something-for-nothing-culture,” where excessive government funds are placed on individuals who are not investing in society in any meaningful way (BBC UK). Under the Conservative Party’s policy, it is necessary to fulfill certain requirements in order to receive benefits. One example of these requirements includes community service, and attending a job center on a daily basis to make sure that one is actually searching for a job (Conservative Party Website). As an individual who works and pays…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Britain, 1951 - 2007

    • 3993 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The Conservative victory of 1979 was won against a background of a decade of recession in which materialistic expectations were disappointed, and in four years out of ten, average real living standards did not rise at all. Labour suffered a massive haemorrhage of working class votes. Labour’s policies were out of tune with the aspiration of a significant section of its natural…

    • 3993 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays