Preview

Do You Agree With The View That The Con

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
936 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do You Agree With The View That The Con
Do you agree with the view that the Conservatives were certain to win in 1979?
Thatcher offered different and better ideas for the country and government which many people believed an improvement, gaining her a lot of popularity amongst the public but before the Conservatives were in government with Thatcher, the Labour party had a few difficulties (such as the winter of Discontent) whilst in power, which is possibly why the Conservatives won the General election. However this win could be purely down to the conservatives and their new policies or it could’ve been down to the failure of the Labour party. I believe that it was combination of the two that led to the Conservatives win but the win, as much as it seemed likely wasn’t indefinitely certain.
Some people believed at the time that the “Conservatives were certain to win” [source 7] the election in 1979. A major blow to the Labour party in 1978 was the Winter of Discontent which was seen as one of the most “catastrophic” events of their time in government and a factor that severely weakened the party. “That winter enabled Thatcher to come to grips with Callaghan” [source 7] Young expresses here that the way the Labour party handled that situation showed their weakness as a government giving Thatcher and the Conservative party a chance to observe and analyse what they had to do in order to win the election. Although the Winter of Discontent made out that the Labour party was definitely going to lose the election, “a Labour defeat was not a predestined certainty” [source 9]. Rowe says that “Callaghan might have won if he had gone for an election in 1978” [source 9] as at this time, Thatcher was far from popular and Callaghan was ahead of her in the opinion polls which shows the government had support. In 1978, the Daily Mail did a poll which showed 50% of the population were satisfied by the way Callaghan was running things and only 44% were for Thatcher. But it was the fact that “Callaghan tried to downplay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At the time Labour was a significantly divided party with the Gaitskillites and the Bevanites meaning some support of voters was lost through lack of assurance that the party would lead with strength and could make decisions that were right for the nation and not selfish. The Labour economy policies are also a reason why they lost. Gaitskell promised to increase public spending without increasing taxes. This put his credibility under question. Another reason is that although voters were happy with the nationalisation of electricity, gas, atomic energy and airline industries they thought public ownership of coal and the railways had been a failure when they were last in government and there was little enthusiasm for further nationalisation which Labour was committed to by Clause Four of the Labour Party Constitution.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1978 Labour were met with, what could be, one of the most catastrophic events of their time in government; the Winter of Discontent. Source 7 expresses that “that winter enabled Thatcher to come to grips with Callaghan…Callaghan tried to downplay the crisis”, here Young is expressing that following this winter the conservatives were sure to win. On the 22nd January, around 1.5million workers came out on strike this was to get a pay rise. However, the Wilson and Callaghan governments had failed to meet their expectations and instead had alienated a large section of their supporters and had given encouragement to the opposition. Therefore, the Winter of Discontent may have foreshadowed the outcome of the 1979 general election. However “Callaghan might have won if he had gone for an election in 1978”(Chris Rowe, Source 9) at this time Callaghan was ahead of Thatcher in the opinion polls, this shows his government were gaining support. Although his relaxed attitude did have its attractions previously but this was not ideal when the country were experiencing economic crises; when asked about the crises he declared “Crisis, what Crisis”. This attitude may have impacted on the result of the vote as it may have impacted the voter’s views on Callaghan – perhaps thinking he didn’t care? However, if Callaghan had made the decisive decision in 1978 for a general election,…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thatcher remained victorious after the General Election in 1987 with 42.9% of the popular vote which meant she was up half a point from the General Election in 1983 which shows that she was continuing her success with the electorate and was continuing to be seen to be a strong…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Harold Macmillan said in 1957 that Britain had “never had it so good” it was easy to see why he spoke with such optimism. The period of Conservative dominance brought many benefits to the British people including the end of rationing, full employment and a boom in the economy. However, in labour’s 1964 manifesto they described this period as “thirteen wasted years”. It seems difficult to believe that both could be true and in this essay I will be assessing the successes and failures of the Conservative government during this time.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the 1924 Labour government was undoubtedly one of the most important developments in party politics, there were other factors that contributed to the change from Liberal vs Conservatives in the 1880 to Labour vs conservative with Liberal's downfall by 1951. The 1924 Labour government was arguably a significant development as it was the first time Labour won an election, proving they had progressed from a small independent party to a real opponent of the Conservatives. This was significant as it showed that Labour had finally gotten their foot in the door and how Conservatives had not fully recovered from their decline in the previous 2 decades. The win was a huge shock to the Conservatives, but they won in a weak position and only lasted 10 months.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1906 general election is often referred to as the ‘liberal landslide’, but the success of the liberal party was arguably due more to conservative mistakes than what they offered new politically. A number of key conservative policies (all highly played out in the national press) all played a part in the reversal of almost 20 years of tory rule in the 1906 election.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward Heath was elected leader of the Conservative Party in 1965, being the first “commoner” to take power of the Conservatives. Edward Heath later won the 1970 General Election for the Conservative Party on the 'Selsdon…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miss

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the view that Thatcher’s electoral success was a result of the weakness of the Labour Party…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thatcherites were extremely traditional in their view of the constitution and political system. Modern conservatives now accept that constitutional reform is essential and that the political system needs a good deal of democratic renewal. Although tax cuts are part of the ‘Cameron agenda’ in the long run, the modern party accepts that tax cutting should not be part of a dogmatic ideology, but instead should only be undertaken when the economic conditions are favourable. In general Cameron’s Conservative party is more adaptable and pragmatic, whereas Thatcherism was a more fixed, dogma with fixed principles. There are, however, several points which could be seen as ways in which the modern Conservative Party retains some Thatcherite ideas…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘The Conservatives’ inability to economically modernise Britain was the main reason why Labour won the 1964 election.’ Assess the validity of this statement (45)…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In June of 1970, Thatcher was selected secretary of state for education and science because Conservatives returned to office. Soon after being selected secretary of state for education and science, Thatcher eliminated the universal free school milk scheme and was called “Thatcher, milk snatcher.” Thatcher ended up finding that the position of secretary of state for education and science was very frustrating. Her position was not frustrating because of all the bad press that came from her actions, but because she was having difficulties with getting Prime Minister Edward Heath to even listen to her ideas. Due to everything happening, Thatcher was disappointed on the future of women in politics and on a 1973 television appearance said, “I don’t think there will be a woman prime minister in my lifetime.” Thatcher was soon able to prove herself wrong. Thatcher was able to become a dominant force in her political party even with the Conservative Party losing power in 1974. In 1975, Thatcher beat out Heath for his position and was elected leader of the Conservation Party. Thatcher became the first woman to serve as the opposition leader in the House of Commons with her victory over Heath. Thatcher became a leader at a horrible time because England was in a time of economic and political…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miss

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    ‘The record of Labour governments in the years 1964 and 1979 was one of continuous failure.’ Asses the validity of this view. (45 marks)…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Suez crisis greatly affected the conservative party as a whole. For an example the lack of trust with the party. Eden secretly colluded with the Israelis, even when this want known by the public the war between the Israelis and the Egyptians looked like a convenient excuse to seize the canal. However aside from this inconvenience the conservative’s social policies had changed increasing the party’s popularity. Such as the economic prosperity at the time. Things such as TVs were becoming increasingly common in people homes. White good such as fridges and washing machines were too becoming increasingly common this prosperity ment people didn’t want change because the quality of life was getting better and there was no need for a change in government. And, as a result of perhaps the most distinctive Conservative policy of these years, home ownership rose from some 30 per cent to nearly 50 per cent, as the famous pledge given in 1950 to build 300, 000 new homes a year was redeemed by Macmillan as Housing Minister after 1951 – giving substance to the great Tory ideal of a property-owning democracy popularised by Anthony Eden after the war, as did the increase in personal savings from under £200 million to nearly £2, 000 million. Welfarism was also a policy of the conservative party, it ment that the poor were looked after by the government more than before by being provided council houses and of course the free healthcare provided by the NHS. The post-war „baby boom‟ meant that there was in any case a need for more schools and teachers, but a series of reports arguably both highlighted the…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays