Preview

How Did Balfour Lose The 1906 Election

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
380 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Balfour Lose The 1906 Election
The 1906 general election is often referred to as the ‘liberal landslide’, but the success of the liberal party was arguably due more to conservative mistakes than what they offered new politically. A number of key conservative policies (all highly played out in the national press) all played a part in the reversal of almost 20 years of tory rule in the 1906 election.

The conservative leader at the time AJ Balfour was considered a poor public speaker as was considered out-of-touch with many of the issues of the day. He resigned the year before the election, but already the rot had set in with the electorate and the liberal party was becoming re-invigorated and more united than in recent years.

Significant issues that beset the tory


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The government could not fumction without money so the issue was put to the voters to decide. The Conservatives had to win a large number of seats in order to justify their rejection of the budget, however they did not and ithe election was therefore a defeat for the Conservatives. However, the Liberals no longer had an overall majority in the commons so they could only get their bills passed if they got the support of the Labour party and Irish Nationalists. The Irish Nationalists would only give their support in return for granting of Home Rule for Ireland, so the Liberal party had to include Home Rule in their policy. The Liberals were reliant on the Labour Party as Labour would only support them in return for favourable legislation for trade unions, assistance for working class candidates to become MPs. This allowed the Labour Party to develop links with uniona and allowed them to field more candidates at future elections, enabling them to challenge the Liberal Party; weakening the Liberals. After the election the budget was re-introduced into parliament and was passed by both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time Labour was a significantly divided party with the Gaitskillites and the Bevanites meaning some support of voters was lost through lack of assurance that the party would lead with strength and could make decisions that were right for the nation and not selfish. The Labour economy policies are also a reason why they lost. Gaitskell promised to increase public spending without increasing taxes. This put his credibility under question. Another reason is that although voters were happy with the nationalisation of electricity, gas, atomic energy and airline industries they thought public ownership of coal and the railways had been a failure when they were last in government and there was little enthusiasm for further nationalisation which Labour was committed to by Clause Four of the Labour Party Constitution.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) was the winner of the 1935 federal election, but what made the voters choose them over the other parties in the election? To begin, the leader of the party J.S. Woodsworth, was able to persuade voters with motivational speeches, respond to voter questions with confidence, and the party platform was also well written and balanced. To begin, a contributing factor to the success of the CCF were the motivational and persuasive speeches by the leader of the party, J.S. Woodsworth. He appealed to the entire audience and his party was in the center of attention. Additionally, the CCF were able to respond proficiently to questions posed by the voters with detail and clarity which led to voter confidence.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most important factor in the liberal victory in the 1902 election was the involvement of Balfour and miscalculations whilst running the conservatives as Prime Minister. Balfour was not the only cause but was the main reason for the turnaround in electoral fortunes. Salisbury had the conservative party well under control and there were no signs of a turnaround; when Balfour took over everything changed. It is argued that if Arthur Balfour never took over then the electoral turnaround would never of happened. The first major mistake by Balfour was the 1902 education act, Salisbury knew the dangers of the act but Balfour nevertheless carried on with the education bill. The bill was so unpopular with the non-conformist Liberals and due to Balfour supporting the act and having been the one to get the act through…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    B.Thesis: While a number of factors contributed to the demise of the Populist Party, the failed election of 1896 played an integral role in its fall due to the party's inability to find a strong figurehead.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This was the first time the Liberals were reunited since the Boer war. This aided them in an attempt to reunite there votes aswell. This meant that they were the second biggest party after the conservatives. All they needed to do was show the weaknesses of Balfour. The final nail in the coffin was having a decisive manifesto over free trede and how they refused to do it in case it harmed the working class. It was most important to appease the working class because they were the majority of the vote but they were also the poorest people able to vote with decisiveness.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bread For All Summary

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    H. Pelling argue that the reforms were actually unwanted by the working class: “the extension of the power of the state at the beginning of this century, which is generally regarded as having laid the foundations of the Welfare State, was by no means welcomed by members of the working class, was indeed undertaken over the critical hostility of many of them, perhaps most of them”. Pat Thane gives further evidence for this theory. The fact that the more far-reaching of the Liberal reforms only begun in 1908, after Campbell-Bannerman’s resignation, also seems to count against any theory which ascribes sole responsibility for the reforms to Labour and the working class: nothing major changed in terms of Labour MPs or working class opinion in these two years; the major change was a “New Liberal” politician taking over from a Gladstonian liberal. The ideology of individual politicians was arguably more important, and this was influenced by Booth, Rowntree, and T.H. Green. It is also important to consider the timing of the reforms – had they been due entirely to working class enfranchisement and pressure, surely they would have occurred immediately after the 1867 Reform Act, rather than in the early twentieth…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Labour Party growth was a key factor in the Liberal Governments desire to introduce reforms affecting children as the Labour Part was emerging as the party for the working class, a position that the Liberals had previously held. In the 1906 elections the Labour Party had gained 30 seats where previously they had held 2 after the 1900 election, between 1907-09 they also made some gains in by elections. David Lloyd George summarised the position of the Liberal Government in a speech where he said that the only way to guarantee Liberal support was through reform. This meant that through the years’ jop 1906-08 the Liberal government passed reforms that affected children as it was hoped it would guarantee support from the parents of the working class as it would be clear that the Liberal Government was interested in helping the working class. Growth of the Liberal Party also resulted in the development of New Liberalism in the Liberal Party which also contributed to the reforms for children.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The split of the Conservative in 1846 due to the repeal of the Corn Laws and the following death of Bentinck were important factors in allowing Disraeli to become the leader of the Conservative Party. Disraeli was instrumental in the split of the Conservative Party, being the leader of the vicious attacks on the authority and reputation of Sir Robert Peel. Despite being a fantastic showcase of his speaking abilities, these attacks led to many of the more experienced and higher status politicians leaving the Conservatives Party, to join Peel in the Peelites group. The split left the Conservatives with little leadership, and it also opportunely put Disraeli in contact with Lord George Bentinck who status ensured that many of the remaining Conservatives were happy to follow the pair. Coinciding with Disraeli’s seeming reinvention, in 1847, he became ‘Knight of the Shire’ of Bucks and financed by his new patrons the Bentinck’s, he became a true dandy, more of a landed country gentleman. The death of Bentinck in 1848 left Disraeli as the only potential leader of the Conservatives, in the House of Commons. The split of the Conservative Party and Bentinck’s death were important in Disraeli’s emergence, however it was his oratory and political skill which largely caused the split, therefore being an underlying cause of a factor of his own success.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps the most important policy contributing to the Tories’ defeat was the Tariff Reform pushed by Joseph Chamberlain. The reform would have taxed many foods coming from other countries, whilst showing preference to imports from within the British Empire. The intention was the protection and growth of the Empire (Imperial Protectionism), but the idea split the Conservatives and Balfour refused to accept the policy. This caused Chamberlain’s resignation, and made the party look indecisive and caused a divide. The Liberal party would use this to their advantage in the 1906 election and painted the Tories as the party of highly…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liberals created many reforms which impacted the lives of British people differing between aid and attention for well being of all ages and insurance for the unemployed or sick. This essay will investigate whether they were of positive or negative on the British people.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perhaps, the most ‘revolutionary’ reform that Labour introduced was the NHS. Although there was liberal influence and consensus between the parties over welfare, the clear historical fact remains that Atlee’s Labour party introduced this. The public were in dire need of better healthcare – especially those who couldn’t afford it. Unfortunately, the majority of the population after the war were still living on a very small income and not many people in society could afford health services.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1964 election changed the British political landscape forever as a thirteen-year Conservative dominance crumbled at the hands of Harold Wilson and his youthful Labour Party. Historians, such as Rowe, postulate that there are a plethora of reasons to why Labour won the 1964 election, most prominently because of the Conservatives’ inability to economically modernise Britain. Contrastingly, other historians such as Lynch uphold the opinion that there are other factors responsible for Labour’s victory, including Labour’s prominence in areas of politics where the Conservatives lacked…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays