Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Miss

Better Essays
1342 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Miss
‘The record of Labour governments in the years 1964 and 1979 was one of continuous failure.’ Asses the validity of this view. (45 marks)

The Labour governments throughout the years 1964 and 1979 can be considered a period of continuous failure. 1964, Harold Wilson came into power riding a wave of expectation and idealism, fuelled by the ‘the white heat’ of technological change. By 1970 however, Labour was in some difficulty and resulted in its time in power to slowly be ebbed away.
At the time of their election, Wilson’s government seemed well suited to the tasks at hand. Wilson was calm, relaxed and a skilful performer on television. His personality could not be matched as Heath, the leader of the Conservative party, realised. Wilson also seemed to be in tune with modern trends and had a genuine commitment to science and technology and a lot of scientists were employed as government advisors. As a result he strengthened the department of education and science and the 1963 Robbins Report on higher education was implemented. By 1966 seven new universities, Sussex, East Anglia, Kent, York, Essex, Lancaster and Warwick, were set up and running. Several new modernising acts aimed at social issues were created like the home secretary Roy Jenkins promotion of liberalisation, the Parliament voted against capital punishment in 1965 and a new Race Relations Act was passed.
However, for the Wilson government, reorganising the economic policy was less successful. Many Labour ministers’ blamed matters outside the governments control, for example, the difficult balance of payments situation they had inherited from the Conservatives. There were also anti-Labour attitudes from the vast majority of senior civil servants and from the Bank of England. However, other people felt that it was simply Labour that made a mess of their attempts to reconstruct the economy, especially the National Plan introduced by George Brown in 1965. Wilson was worried about his small parliamentary majority from 1964 and showed a lot of anxiety, maybe even paranoia, about what he felt was biased, creating hostile coverage by the BBC and national press. In 1966, Wilson called for a general election. There was a clear-cut election win with Labour winning a majority of 98 seats.
Modernisation of the British economy was one of the key priorities for the Labour government. However, it was evident that that by 1964 Britain was far behind the more advanced economies of West Germany and Japan. As Labour came into power they inherited a serious balance of payments crisis with a deficit of 400 million, the worse since the Second World War. The solutions to the problems were either deflation or devaluation. However, Wilson did not want to do any and was desperate to prove that Labour was not ‘the party of devaluation’. Wilson and Callaghan made a huge effort to avoid devaluation as the Attlee government had been forced to do so in 1949.
The drive for economic expansion resulted n the creation of a new department of economic affairs which was led by George Brown. However, there where problems with the DEA as it overlapped with the Treasury and the role of the Chancellor, Callaghan. This resulted in the Civil Servant finding it difficult to know who they were listening to. However after the 1966 election, George Brown was moved sideways to the foreign office and the DEA faded away. After bringing in a prices and incomes policy to keep down inflation there was another sterling crisis in 1966, which was caused in part by a long bitter strike by the National Union of Seamen. There was also another major docks strike in 1967, affecting London and Merseyside and the sterling crisis threatened to run out of control. The government decided in 1967 to devaluate. The devaluation crisis damaged Labour’s credibility and their second application to join the EEC was rejected. French President de Gaulle still played a defiant role, even though their application to join was on economic grounds. However, having their application rejected hard on the heels if the devaluation crisis made the government’s economic policies look futile. Roy Jenkins, the new Chancellor, used deflation methods and raised taxes and tightened government spending. Although this made the government unpopular, by 1969, Jenkins had achieved a balance of payment surplus.
After losing the 1970 general election to Edward Heath Labour went into opposition but kept Harold Wilson as their leader. However, Heaths government soon ran into trouble with the miners which led to the ‘three-day week’ which was created to conserve energy levels in Britain. However, the 70s proved to be a difficult time for both the Conservative and the Labour Party who struggled with high inflation due to the 1973 oil crisis. In 1974 the Labour Party returned to power, however Wilson seemed to be in a much less promising situation than he was in 1964. The Labour government had to highly rely on other parties to gain legislation through parliament. The economic situation was awful and the Labour Party was less united than ever. Wilson himself was less energetic and less certain in his way of governing and was anxious to call another election. Wilson acted quickly about the inherited economic and industrial relations that caused Heaths fall. The Industrial Relations Act and the pay boards where abolished, the trade unions were sent a clear message that the government was not looking for any confrontation. Denis Healey, Wilsons new chancellor, issued two budgets. They aimed to deal with the economic crisis without annoying the unions.
However, Wilson suddenly resigned in 1976 due to ill health and a promise to his wife that he would retire, leaving James Callaghan as the Labour leader. The Wilson and Callaghan government tried to control inflation by issuing a policy of wage restraint. This was fairly successful, reducing inflation to 7.4% by 1978. However, this led to increasingly strained relations between the government and the trade unions. The nationalist parties demanded devolution to their respective constituent countries in return for their supporting the government. The Welsh Devolution in 1979 was rejected outright while the Scottish referendum returned with a narrow majority in favour without reaching the required threshold of 40% support. When the Labour government refused to push with setting up the proposed Scottish Assembly the SNP withdrew their support, this finally brought down the government through a vote of confidence the Callaghan’s government lost by a single vote on necessitating a general election.
It was widely expected that Callaghan would call a general election in the autumn of 1978 when the opinion polls showed that Labour had a narrow lead over the Conservatives. However he decided to extend his wage restraint policy for another year hoping that the economy would be better shape for a 1979 election. However during the winter of 1978 there were widespread strikes among lorry drivers, railway workers, car workers and local government and hospital workers in favour of higher pay-rises that caused significant disruption to everyday life. The events of the ‘Winter of Discontent’ caused Labour to suffer electoral defeat by the Conservatives, now led by Margaret Thatcher. However, the number of people voting Labour hardly changed between 1974 and 1979 but in 1979 the Conservative Party achieved big increases in support in the Midlands and the South of England.
In conclusion, throughout the years 1964 to 1979 the Labour government where not a continuous failure. The Wilson government introduced many positive and successful policies such as the opening of new universities, a new Race Relations Act and laws involving abortion and homosexuality. However, Wilson’s government regarding the reorganising of economic policies failed, although it could be argued that these where not entirely Labours fault but that they inherited problems from previous governments or the actual mismanagement by the Labour Government themselves. However, Callaghan failed to maintain the government in 1978 during the ‘Winter of Discontent’ by miss judging the timing of a general election while he still had a chance to succeed. Instead they lost to Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At the time Labour was a significantly divided party with the Gaitskillites and the Bevanites meaning some support of voters was lost through lack of assurance that the party would lead with strength and could make decisions that were right for the nation and not selfish. The Labour economy policies are also a reason why they lost. Gaitskell promised to increase public spending without increasing taxes. This put his credibility under question. Another reason is that although voters were happy with the nationalisation of electricity, gas, atomic energy and airline industries they thought public ownership of coal and the railways had been a failure when they were last in government and there was little enthusiasm for further nationalisation which Labour was committed to by Clause Four of the Labour Party Constitution.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1978 Labour were met with, what could be, one of the most catastrophic events of their time in government; the Winter of Discontent. Source 7 expresses that “that winter enabled Thatcher to come to grips with Callaghan…Callaghan tried to downplay the crisis”, here Young is expressing that following this winter the conservatives were sure to win. On the 22nd January, around 1.5million workers came out on strike this was to get a pay rise. However, the Wilson and Callaghan governments had failed to meet their expectations and instead had alienated a large section of their supporters and had given encouragement to the opposition. Therefore, the Winter of Discontent may have foreshadowed the outcome of the 1979 general election. However “Callaghan might have won if he had gone for an election in 1978”(Chris Rowe, Source 9) at this time Callaghan was ahead of Thatcher in the opinion polls, this shows his government were gaining support. Although his relaxed attitude did have its attractions previously but this was not ideal when the country were experiencing economic crises; when asked about the crises he declared “Crisis, what Crisis”. This attitude may have impacted on the result of the vote as it may have impacted the voter’s views on Callaghan – perhaps thinking he didn’t care? However, if Callaghan had made the decisive decision in 1978 for a general election,…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Heath government was not a total failure as when he came into office in 1970, he marked changed throughout Britain, mainly because Heath himself came in with a ‘bustle of no-nonsense efficiency’ and many saw that it was what Britain needed. One of Heath’s first successes was the establishment of a New Relations Court, made by legislation, similar to that of Barbara Castle. This was a success for Heath as it would see fair play for workers and employers, and end industrial anarchy that had bedevilled the country. This showed that Heath knew what he wanted and had the determination to get what he wanted, an important characteristic that made the public have hope that Heath could get them out of the situation they had lived in for years. Therefore, you could argue that the Heath government made legislations based on the public needs, which shows a successful government that was not a total failure.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Harold Macmillan said in 1957 that Britain had “never had it so good” it was easy to see why he spoke with such optimism. The period of Conservative dominance brought many benefits to the British people including the end of rationing, full employment and a boom in the economy. However, in labour’s 1964 manifesto they described this period as “thirteen wasted years”. It seems difficult to believe that both could be true and in this essay I will be assessing the successes and failures of the Conservative government during this time.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This lack of progress was also due to a general downturn in the economy: caused by WW1 and the growth of competition abroad. A policy of retrenchment was introduced after a short boom. Retrenchment did not allow the kind of reform people wanted. Lloyd George earned the anger of workers wanting reforms by refusing to nationalize mines and using heavy-handed tactics dealing with a strike in Glasgow. Had Lloyd George not been part of the coalition would he have adopted this policy and lost the sizeable support of the miners? Or was nationalization not practical and fear of revolution justified? Lloyd George's stance and Liberals in general also were confused on issues such as industrial relations. In the polarization of politics that was happening the Liberal party in the middle didn't seem to have an obvious set of principles that were relevant to the unfolding century…

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liberals created many reforms which impacted the lives of British people differing between aid and attention for well being of all ages and insurance for the unemployed or sick. This essay will investigate whether they were of positive or negative on the British people.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perhaps, the most ‘revolutionary’ reform that Labour introduced was the NHS. Although there was liberal influence and consensus between the parties over welfare, the clear historical fact remains that Atlee’s Labour party introduced this. The public were in dire need of better healthcare – especially those who couldn’t afford it. Unfortunately, the majority of the population after the war were still living on a very small income and not many people in society could afford health services.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    didn 't have much trust in the government, but Wilson changed all that by focusing on one thing.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour Reforms 1945-1951

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When the war ended in 1945, the Labour Government, led by Clement Atlee, were faced with tackling numerous problems that existed in Britain. Their aim was to meet the welfare needs of the British people who, during the war, got used to support provided by the government. In 1942, a Civil Servant and an experienced worker on social welfare named William Beveridge constructed a report which would go on to become the basis for the Labour reforms. By 1951, Labour had introduced many different reforms aiming to tackle the problems that faced Britain. The Beveridge Report identified what is known as the 5 giants; these include disease, want, squalor, idleness and ignorance. Arguably the most important and successful were the acts introduced to tackle disease and want, but some may disagree. Nevertheless, it is clear that the Labour government met most of the needs of the British people between 1945-1951.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, a major reason for Labour’s victory was because Harold Wilson advocated a campaign for economic modernisation of Britain so the nation did not fall behind the excelling economies of European rivals such as West Germany. Economists raise the significant point that economic modernisation looks at the internal dynamics of a nation while referring to social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies. The Conservatives failed in every social and economic aspect of this theory, as shown in 1963, as unemployment reached approximately 800,000 making a mockery of Macmillan’s, ‘never had it so good speech.’ The inability of the Conservative Party to economically modernise Britain led not only to their downfall in the 1964 election, but also to the collapse of Britain’s economy during this era. Economists point out that as a result of Conservative mismanagement of the economic sectors, Britain faced financial hardships, including a huge balance of payments deficit, which undeniably caused higher levels of inflation, causing the cost of living for ordinary British people to rise. Moreover, the economic boom of the late 1950s and the, ‘Age of Affluence,’ had reached its end, with great saturation in the markets for consumer goods. Inevitably, poor…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in office President Wilson managed to successfully bring about great changes…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Woodrow Wilson Dbq

    • 4021 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Although some critics thought that the educational reforms that Wilson supported were too extreme, his social and political outlook remained largely conservative. For the most part, Wilson avoided controversies and stressed such non-controversial ideals as the need for a vital church, the spirit of learning, and other inspirational topics. Wilson was specific only on the issue of tariffs, or import taxes, which he viewed as restricting…

    • 4021 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the analysis of Wilson’s impact on the United States economy, society and politics, it is important to briefly depict Wilson’s…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays