Preview

1974 Sam Ervin And Nixon Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
644 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1974 Sam Ervin And Nixon Analysis
Document Analysis
“Statement on the Impeachment of Richard Nixon” 1974 Sam Ervin

One of the most important figures of the Watergate affair was Sam Ervin. In 1946, the Southern Democrat served a brief term in Congress after the death of his brother. In 1954 he entered Congress again after the death of U.S Senator Clyde R. Hoey, and Ervin remained in the Senate until he retired in 1974. In 1972, Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield appointed Ervin to chair the Select Committee on Watergate.
Mansfield called him, “the only person who could have handled this assignment.” During his twenty years as a Senator, Ervin acquired a reputation as an authority on American Constitutional Law. Throughout his political career, Ervin was known to be very conservative; he opposed many civil rights and desegregation legislation, but he had independent judgment and unyielding dedication to constitutional principles. Ervin’s leadership was necessary for this task because he was visible
…show more content…
“The stage was set for a great constitutional struggle between a President determined not to give up executive documents and materials and a Senate committee and a federal prosecutor who are determined to get them," The White House claimed “Executive Privilege” when they refused to disclose the recorded tapes of President Nixon and his aides. Nixon and his advisors became arrogant with their possession of power. The Executive Branch was disrupting the balance of power and the separation of powers written into the Constitution. No Branch, elected official, governmental worker, or even the President is above the law, but Nixon definitely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Case: US V. Nixon

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A grand jury returned indictments against seven of President Nixon’s White House staff members and political supporters of the President for violation of federal statutes in the Watergate affair,. The President on the other hand was named as an un-indicted co-conspirator. The Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski filed a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure - Rule 17 for a subpoena duces tecum, a court summons ordering the President to appear before the court and produce tapes, documents and other tangible evidence relating to precisely identified conversations and meeting between President Nixon and his aides. The District Court initially treated the subpoena material as presumptively privileged, but then concluded that the Special Prosecutor made sufficient showing to justify a subpoena for production before trial. The District Court then issued an order for an in camera examination of the subpoenaed material, rejecting President Nixon’s contentions that the judiciary lacked authority to review his assertion of absolute executive privileged and the dispute between him and the Special Prosecutor was nonjusticiable as an “intra-executive” conflict.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caning of Charles Sumnner

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On May 22, 1856 the Senate was so empty that the most insignificant sound would have echoed across the whole chamber. Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts’s senator, sat at his senatorial desk by the window after a chamber meeting to write letter and read various documents. Suddenly, the light was blocked out by South Carolina senator, Preston Brooks. Brooks who entered the chamber “well protected by friends at hand” walked up to Sumner holding a Guttarpecha walking cane. As he viciously held his walking cane senator Brooks said, “Mr. Sumner, I have read your speech twice over carefully. It is a libel on South Carolina and Mr. Butler, who is a relative of mine.” 12 The inspiration for this clash came when Charles Sumner, an antislavery Republican, addressed the senate on the explosive issue of whether Kansas should be admitted to the Union as a free state or a slave state. Charles Sumner was an outspoken individual in American history; he devoted an immense amount of energy towards…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Nixon tried to use executive privilege for his defense within his court case. He argued for the use of the privilege by stating that his powers cannot be questioned by other branches. He claimed that he has “absolute immunity” from his decision making to be interfered with by any other branch. He also claimed that his privilege should extend to his colleagues. If he does not have to be questioned, then his constituents should not be either since they hold all of his information. President Reagan’s arguments were extremely similar. He argued that he should be allowed executive privilege to protect the republic from the damaging effects of disclosure of secret, executive branch information.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nixon had a distrust of any of his political opponents, along with the media. He was also fearful of losing any of his political power. He believed his opponents were not only threats to him, but also the country. He was convinced that his Democratic opponents were planning to sabotage his presidential campaign. This led to his support for spying on his opposition.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman Dbq Analysis

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the executive order and executive privilege were introduced with good intentions, many believe that the latter was abused—especially during Richard Nixon’s presidency, however, this argument is and can be solely based off of a biased perspective. While in “Nixon’s Address to the Nation on his Secret Tape Recordings”, from 1974, which is a moderately strong document due to its author being a former president (the validity suffers because Nixon is biased in favor of himself), it can be seen that the president had a reason behind his controversial actions: “Ever since the existence of the White House taping system was first made known last summer, I have tried vigorously to guard the privacy of the tapes. I have been well aware that my effort to protect the confidentiality of Presidential conversations has heightened the sense of mystery about Watergate and, in fact, has…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.” Whether it was the last resource to keep the Union together or he truthfully supported the amendment, the notion that slavery was the deciding factor that triggered the Civil War does not give justice to other significant events that transpired to reach such…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joan Biskupic’s novel In American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, describes Scalia’s success as an influential conservative force in the Supreme Court, which conservative lawyer, Alfred S. Regnery, bolsters, expanding on William Rehnquist’s role in establishing the groundwork allowed for a major a shift towards right in courts, in The American Spectator article, “The Good Old Days”. Regnery begins by establishing he agrees with Biskupic’s assertions that Scalia has been the “most influential member”: “changing the terms of the debate at the Court” and influencing many. Regnery, however, submits that although the degree of Scalia’s achievements hadn’t been accomplished before, Rehnquist, in fact…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution Dbq

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the 1850’s, the supreme and absolute Constitution, which had previously seen no topic it couldn’t resolve or illuminate in the eyes of its interpreters, was faced with its toughest, unrelenting foe; the issue of slavery, and the locations that it existed in or was desired to exist in. Ultimately, this issue led to the demise of the Union that had been created under the watchful and guiding eye of the Constitution. This decade in particular was brimming with the reoccurring argument of whether or not slavery would be allowed to expand into any newly-acquired United States territories. The sectional discord that resulted between the South and the North as a result…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson was a highly respected man of his time. He possessed loyal followers, the Jacksonian democrats, who championed Jackson’s constituency both before and during his presidency. The Jacksonians placed a high value on the common man and his worth to the American government, so they made a large effort to protect him. In the eyes of the Jacksonians, they fully worked towards guarding the constitution; however, although they made many successful progressions, there were certain shortcomings that couldn’t be overlooked.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution politically, by removing restrictions in the government; economically, by the elimination of the National Bank; and liberally, by supposed “individual equality”. Andrew Jackson’s followers of the 1820’s and 1830 have proved overall to protect the economic opportunity and political democracy of the U.S. Constitution; however, it failed to defend all aspects of individual liberty.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clarence Thomas

    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages

    In the annals of American history, this name has risen to the forefront of noted Supreme Court Justices and has become synonymous with the ideals and philosophies of uncompromising conservatives. Undeniably, the same name also congers thoughts of hypocrisy, desertion, and self-denial toward one of America 's most divisive and enigmatic political figures. Since his nomination by President George H. Bush to the United States Supreme Court, Justice Thomas has been inundated with criticism by those who oppose his expressed jurisprudence and with praises by those who follow his hard-nosed, unapologetic style of governance in his role as America 's second African-American Supreme Court Justice.…

    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Privilege

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the past, the power of executive privilege has been used by Presidents to conceal information that has to do with foreign affairs and negotiations, military, national security issues as well as deliberations and policy making that is done between the President and his top aides. This power is only used when Congress asks the President or one of his top aides to produce all of the information pertaining to an event or situation. If the President then feels that parts of this information needs to be kept secret to protect the best interest of the public, or the other issues listed previously, then he will use executive privilege in order to not give that information to Congress. A huge part of executive privilege is to protect the deliberations and advice given by the President’s aides. When the President’s advisors give him advice, they need to be able to give him the best advice possible and if there is a chance that everything they said could be made public. For instance if the President and advisors are discussing what needs to be done in relation to a foreign power and one suggests to nuke them, one suggests a covert attack and one suggests a peaceful resolution. If the final decision is a peaceful resolution, and Congress asks for all of the information on the subject, then the President should use executive privilege to keep those other possible outcomes from going public, both to keep the public from getting out of control or uneasy and to keep the other country from finding out the other options and retaliating. This power ensures that the President’s advisors can be completely honest and say what needs to be said without being worried about their words being taken the wrong way or too harsh or hurt their image.…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    meiji constitution

    • 1921 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As restoration swept the nation, clamors for a constitution became deafening. The intellectual debates of the early 1880’s were…

    • 1921 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The accountability of a leader is felt during the most challenging times of his governance. In a normal setting, the many reprobate violations perpetrated by leaders are enough to remove a person from office. In a political environment however, the situation is not so simple. The arduous process of impeaching a public official accused of crimes has not avoided the upper echelons of power as even presidents are culpable to impeachment. Presidents Clinton and Johnson withstood the worst of legislative action by being successfully inculpated only to be acquitted by the Senate. It is also worth noting that President Nixon also faced the wrath of the legislature, choosing to resign in the wake of the Watergate scandal subtly.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    kidnapping

    • 862 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bibliography: West 's Encyclopedia of American Law. Ed. Shirelle Phelps and Jeffrey Lehman. Vol. 6. 2nd ed. Detroit: Gale, 2005. p136-139. From U.S. History In Context…

    • 862 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays