Preview

1st Do No Harm

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1773 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1st Do No Harm
The article titled “First Do No Harm” written by Michael Kidd AM is an inspirational article for the students like us who are going to practice in the field of medicine. First Do No Harm reframes the traditional doctors’ rule, demonstrating that it should apply not only to patients, but also to doctors themselves. With the extensive medical, professional and academic experience, Michael Kidd have created a legacy to be shared with medical students, junior doctors and experienced medical practitioners across all medical specialties. This article has provided a newmeaning of creed, as it is not only about protecting our patients, it is also about protecting the wellbeing of our colleagues, our families, our environment and ourselves. It’s our privilege to write a reflection paper on this article.
While reading the article, I remembered a quotation from Diane Frolov and Andrew Schneider that say “Let’s not kid ourselves. Whatever we diagnose, most patients, if they don't die, get well by themselves. Our job is mainly to try to make them feel better; do no harm”. So it should be clear in our mind that, if we cannot treat a patient then we should not harm also and we should not be involved in contribution of making the condition more worse. This statement is also included in the Hippocratic Oath that a doctor must take after his graduation from medicine, which states “I will not be ashamed to say “I know not,” nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient’s recovery”.
The article starts with a quote from Albert Schweitzer “I don’t know what your destiny will be but one thing I know, the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who have sought and found how to serve”. We felt that this is anappropriate time for us to read this article. It’s our privilege to read this article to understand the relevance of the creed of Primum non nocere that is, first do no harm.The article reminded me that this creed is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    First, Do No Harm

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Patrick Dismuke was a young African American boy, at the age of fifteen when the story starts, and a regular patient at Hermann Hospital. Patrick was born with a severe case of Hirschsprung’s disease, a disorder of the digestive tract, and was unable to digest his food. Throughout Patrick’s life, he spent more days in the hospital than out and came to be quite comfortable with the environment and staff at Hermann. Due to his disease his only way of nutrition was through a feeding tube, unfortunately these tubes often got infected. Since Patrick’s immune system was also weak, the infections were almost as bad as the disease itself. The doctors were forced to put the boy through surgery multiple times to replace infected tubes, each time making him weaker and bringing him closer to death. Once the he became too weak for the surgeries, the doctors were faced with a dilemma- to do surgery or not? The surgery to place a new tube directly into his heart would be risky and potentially kill him, but if the surgery did not occur, the infection would slowly destroy his body and block the tube causing him to starve to death. Before any decisions could be made, the doctors needed to consult the patients mother, Oria Dismuke, was a single mother who worked extensive hours at whatever jobs she could find sometimes working as many as three at a time. Oria was a quiet and didn’t have much to say about her opinion, it’s not that she didn’t care; she was just exhausted and wanted her son to be both happy and comfortable. Along with the mother, the doctors also had to meet with a hospital ethics committee before taking action. The committee met many times throughout the book and made many contradictory decisions depending on his progress at the time of the meeting. First, the committee decides to make Patrick DNR but he began to get better, so after consulting him, they ended up doing another risky surgery. The committee seemed…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An analysis of Robert Schwartz “Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine” reveals that physicians are not required to give patients treatment that has been proven to be effective, and they are not morally obligated to provide treatment that is not in-line with practice of medicine. Schwartz explains although our autonomy is respected, there are limitations on our request.…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author convinced me of his position. He provides evidence on the direction of healthcare, spirituality, morality and human behavior. We should not appoint or seek legal authority to have doctors play god. In my opinion, having a doctor perform such a task will eventually break his psyche. He or she might find it easier to convince love ones to pursue death as the final choice. Doctors are supposed to be caretakers and healers, not the Grim Reaper. The question I would ask myself and others would be, “Why must he or she be burdened with the sins of another and answer to god for the choice we make.”…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The health care professionals are often assumed to have a duty to work, even if faced with personal risk. This is particularly for professionals (doctors and nurses). However, the health service also depends on non-professionals, such as porters, cooks and cleaners. The professional can make decision, a specialist can make decision about patient’s situation, but a nurse is a professional who cannot make a decision, but we are all human, even a doctor may make mistake about the dosage of the drugs that is taken by patients so the nurses should be aware of that, and check the patient information almost often, and check the process of their illness. As a health care professional your priority is your patients. Even as a non-professional health care, they have a moral obligation to work.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why do we have a code of ethics in the medical profession? We as health care professionals need to understand our morals and ethical standards. “Ethics are internal to oneself; values, beliefs, and individual interpretation.” Guido (2010). The physician in this study has decided on his own that there has been no wrong doing…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When a doctor makes a decision for a patient in the name of health, the doctor is violating his or her autonomy. By autonomy, I mean the patient’s right to make medical decisions in terms of his or her health. Consider the following case: a patient has an advanced stage cancer that likely leads to death within a month, but the patient has a slim chance to survive through chemotherapy – which on its own is painful. If Collins was the doctor, he may mislead the patient, exaggerate the chances of survival, and convince the patient to opt for chemotherapy in the “best interest” of the patient’s health. But the patient’s “best interest” is subjective based on the perspective of the doctor or the patient.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tuskegee Study Essay

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In medicine, it is viewed as rational for a physician to positively promote the well-being of his or her patients and it is expected that physicians act in the best interest of their patients. This principle is at the very heart of health care implying that a suffering patient can enter into a relationship with one whom society has licensed as competent to provide medical care, trusting that the physician’s chief objective is to help. The goal of providing benefit can be applied both to individual patients, and to the good of society as a whole. For example, the good health of a particular patient is an appropriate goal of medicine, and the prevention of disease through research and the employment of vaccines is the same goal expanded to the population at large. It is sometimes held that non-maleficence is a constant duty, that is, one ought never to harm another individual, whereas beneficence is a limited duty.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have analyzed this situation from the perspective of a Utilitarian and my own viewpoints which go hand in hand. While others may see this as morally wrong and believe it goes against a physician’s ethical code of conduct, I completely disagree. I find the physicians who have the compassion to help these patients to relieve their suffering for once and for all to be truly inspiring even when so many people will pass judgements and disagree with their decision. As I stated before, doctors have very hard jobs and constantly have people judge and disapprove of their methods and treatments and I find it admirable that they still make the best decisions and take the patients best interests into consideration, even if that means assisting their…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctoring is the only profession where one’s career is devoted to another’s well being, and it is the only profession in which I can find academic challenge, honor, and moral fulfillment I seek.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Does Autonomy Mean?

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After all it is their own body. Doctors may be more educated and know what’s best for the patient but if the patient’s decision is autonomous it should be respected. A doctor should not let their own values impact whether…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctors make mistakes in a patient’s medical care. Doctors are not perfect because they’re human and, as a result, they misdiagnose patients. For example, a woman was diagnosed with cancer, then she decided to take a lethal dose of painkillers which led to her death. However, during her autopsy the medical examiner found she never had cancer (St. Clair). In a study by John Hopkins Medicine more than 250,000 Americans die each year due to medical errors (Allen and Pierce). Doctors make mistakes all the time and this results in patients dying without being diagnosed with a terminally ill illness.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autonomy In Nursing

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also, nobody is present from their family to make decision on their behalf. This could give rise the ethical problem and dilemma for a nurse and/or for a paramedic because patient refused treatment. It would result in delay in patient care (Betts, 2013). Although to build effective relationship with a patient, trust is really important and this can only build by maintaining the patient autonomy (Betts, 2013). Autonomy of the patient is admired by ethical code of conduct and regulations as outlined by Australian Medical Association (AMA). It defines that for health care providers, the thought of the good health of patient should be kept at prime precedence (Townsend & Luck,…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Hippocratic oath, “specifically notes that the physician will give no deadly medicine”(Fuller 11). Just like any other document with mandating guidelines, there is room for interpretations. If a physician is following the letter of the ‘law’, they would follow the literal interpretation of the words in the oath but not necessarily the intent of Hippocrates. Following the spirt of the ‘law’ in this case, could be not to cause a patient intentional harm or pain. The over arching idea of the Hippocratic oath is to “do no harm”. Josh Sanburn writes, “Since Hippocrates, doctors have taken their credo to do no harm. But what if a patient believes the treatment to keep them alive is more harmful than death?”(Sanburn 50) In the award winning documentary, “ How to Die in Oregon” Dr. Katherine Morris sheds light on a new outlook on “do not harm”. The documentary follows the last months of a terminal ill patient, Cody Curtis’s, life. Dr. Morris states, “ I think Cody taught me that first do no harm is going to be different for every patient. Harm, for her, would have meant taking away control and saying no, no, no, you’ve got to do this the way your body decides as opposed to the way you as a person decides”(Dir. Peter Richardson). Do no harm is different for every patient and stay alive though continual suffering can cause unnecessary harm to a…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As students works towards their Ph.D., they are often reminded of the things that are expected from them as they enter the workforce. One expectation that the future physicians in the United States of America are to know, is the Principles of Medical Ethics, a list of ethics adopted by the American Medical Association in June of 1957 and most recently revised in June 2001. In addition to the ethics adopted by the American Medical Association, an upcoming physician should also be aware of the World Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics. Combining both codes of ethics results in an honest and moral physician, whereas breaking the law results in serious consequences.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They suggest that it is often difficult to recognise a dying patient in a hospital setting as the culture is mostly focused on curing the patient instead of actually acknowledging a patient who is dying. Treatments and investigations are usually sought at the expense of the patient receiving a good death. In some cases, there is hesitation in making a diagnoses especially in situations whereby the patient has a chance of improvement. Health care professionals should seek to be truthful as this will consequently build trust between the patient and the health professional. Giving patients false hope may result feelings of disappointment. When recovery is uncertain it is better to discuss this rather than giving false hope to the patient and family. This is generally perceived as a strength in the doctor-patient relationship and helps to build trust. In the case of Mrs. Smith, she was made aware of the potential outcome of her situation before she died. Her family were also made aware; doing this would have…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays